Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Plus Quadratus Lumborum Block or Retrolaminar Block of Multiple Injections for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

June 8, 2022 updated by: dong zhang, Dong Zhang

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Plus Quadratus Lumborum Block or Retrolaminar Block of Multiple Injections for Postoperative Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial

Our hypothesis was that transversus abdominis plane block plus retrolaminar block would reduce postoperative sufentanil consumption and provide superior analgesia compared with transversus abdominis plane block plus quadratus lumborum block for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II class
  • Colorectal cancer patients
  • 18 and 80 years old
  • Elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • serious complications associated with other systems:
  • severe cardiac insufficiency
  • renal failure
  • hepatic encephalopathy
  • infection in the block injection area
  • coagulopathy
  • a known allergy to local anesthetics
  • a previous history of tranquilizer or opioid abuse,
  • body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2 or less than 18 kg/m2,
  • inability to cooperate with the assessment of visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores
  • refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: TR group
ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with 20 ml mixture 0.20% ropivacaine + dexamethasone 5 mg and retrolaminar block with 30-40 ml mixture 0.20% ropivacaine + dexamethasone 5 mg
After the skin near the puncture site was disinfected, 2ml of 1% lidocaine was injected into the puncture site for local infiltration. The needle was inserted beneath the ultrasound probe using an in-plane orientation to contact the lamina of the T8-T11 vertebra. Then we retracted the tip of needle to the lamina about 1 mm and withdrew to make sure that there was no blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Then, 30-40 mL mixture was injected posterior to the lamina of T8-T11.
After placing the patients in the supine position, the skin was disinfected. A linear probe was placed in the transverse plane at the midaxillary line between the lower costal margin and iliac crest. When the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles were observed, 2ml of 1% lidocaine was injected into the puncture site for local infiltration.Then, a 22-gauge, 80-mm needle was advanced using an in-plane technique in an anteromedial to posterolateral direction toward the TAP (the fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles). After the correct position of the needle tip was verified, 20 ml mixture was injected into the TAP. The ultrasound showed that the local anesthetic separated the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles, confirming the success of the block.
EXPERIMENTAL: TQ group
ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with 20 ml mixture 0.20% ropivacaine + dexamethasone 5 mg and quadratus lumborum block with 30 ml mixture 0.20% ropivacaine + dexamethasone 5 mg
After placing the patients in the supine position, the skin was disinfected. A linear probe was placed in the transverse plane at the midaxillary line between the lower costal margin and iliac crest. When the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles were observed, 2ml of 1% lidocaine was injected into the puncture site for local infiltration.Then, a 22-gauge, 80-mm needle was advanced using an in-plane technique in an anteromedial to posterolateral direction toward the TAP (the fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles). After the correct position of the needle tip was verified, 20 ml mixture was injected into the TAP. The ultrasound showed that the local anesthetic separated the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles, confirming the success of the block.
In our study, we applied a transmuscular approach to the QLB. After the patients were placed in the lateral position, the skin near the puncture site was disinfected, a low-frequency (3-5 MHz), curvilinear probe is used and is located vertical to the iliac crest at the posterior axillary line to find the Shamrock sign. After the local infiltration for puncture site, the 22-G needle is then inserted in plane and directed to the QL muscle. After the proper position of the needle tip between the psoas major muscle and the QL muscle is confirmed, 30 ml mixture is injected into the interfascial plane.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the cumulative consumption of sufentanil
Time Frame: 24 hours after nerves block
the outcome in micrograms
24 hours after nerves block

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the patient's mean arterial pressure (MAP), HR at rest and during movement at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24 after nerves block
Time Frame: the time for completion of nerves block was time 0
MAP in mmHg, HR in rate/one minute.
the time for completion of nerves block was time 0
cumulative sufentanil consumption at predetermined time intervals
Time Frame: within 24 hour after nerves block
the outcome in minutes
within 24 hour after nerves block
time until the earliest single patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) dose of sufentanil
Time Frame: within 24 hour after nerves block
the outcome in minutes
within 24 hour after nerves block
the number of PCA press
Time Frame: within 24 hour after nerves block
the outcome in frequency
within 24 hour after nerves block
time until the earliest rescue analgesia and antiemetic
Time Frame: within 24 hour after nerves block
the outcome in minutes
within 24 hour after nerves block
the total dose of rescue analgesia and antiemetic
Time Frame: within 24 hour after nerves block
the outcome in milligrams
within 24 hour after nerves block
block-related complications
Time Frame: within 24 hour after nerves block
such as hematoma, infection, quadriceps weakness, pneumothorax, deep visceral injury, and evidence of systemic toxicity to the local anesthetic
within 24 hour after nerves block
other side events
Time Frame: within 24 hour after nerves block
such as bradycardia (HR less than 60 beats per min), hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg or more than 20% lower than baseline), hypoxemia (SpO2 less than 90%), respiratory depression (RR less than 10 breaths per min lasting for more than 10 min), pruritus, backache, nausea and vomiting
within 24 hour after nerves block
patient satisfaction with pain management
Time Frame: at 24th hour after nerves block
Patient satisfaction on postoperative analgesia using a 5-point scale (1 = very unsatisfied, 2 = unsatisfied, 3 = fair, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied)
at 24th hour after nerves block
the length of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks
the outcome in days
up to 2 weeks
Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain at rest and during movement at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24 after nerves block
Time Frame: the time for completion of nerves block was time 0
The VAS is an internationally recognized scale for assessment of pain on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10 points, with 0 defined as no pain and 10 defined as the worst pain imaginable (units on a scale)
the time for completion of nerves block was time 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

June 20, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 20, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GanSu Province

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on Retrolaminar block on the operative side

Subscribe