The BOOSTED (Booster Options Or Switching Tested for Effectiveness and Downsides Study) Trial (COVID-19) (BOOSTED)

October 6, 2022 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Differences Between Mixing or Matching of Moderna and Pfizer Booster Vaccines for Covid-19 Citizen Science (CCS) Participants

While both heterologous (mixing) and homologous (matching) vaccine regimens are now considered standard of care, post-vaccination complications and long-term effects of the different vaccination regimens have not been thoroughly studied. There is a pressing need to investigate the longitudinal effects of the mixing and matching vaccine-booster approaches. This study proposes to utilize the existing digital infrastructure of the COVID-19 Citizen Science (CCS) study on the Eureka Research Platform to perform a systematic and prospective randomized trial comparing mixing versus matching approaches. Eligible CCS participants will have the opportunity to be randomly assigned to a recommendation of receiving either the Pfizer or Moderna booster vaccine. Long-term effects will be monitored through the participants' completion of their regular weekly CCS follow-up surveys on symptoms and infection. This randomized trial aims to mitigate the effect of confounding variables and provide more conclusive evidence on each regiment to guide booster recommendations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The FDA recently approved the use of COVID-19 booster vaccines for both homologous and heterologous vaccine booster regimens, with both regimens considered standard of care. However, there is incomplete research on the long-term effects and immunity offered by each approach. In fact, the FDA has not offered guidance on whether or not to mix or match vaccines because as of yet, there is no evidence indicating that one strategy should be recommended over the other. Studies have shown that vaccine efficacy declines over time, and the Delta and Omicron variants continue to cause breakthrough cases. Additionally, millions of Americans are now becoming eligible for a booster. These factors present both a pressing need and a unique opportunity to investigate the longitudinal effects of the mixing and matching vaccine-booster approaches.

This study proposes to fill this critical gap through a systematic and prospective randomized trial utilizing the existing digital infrastructure of the COVID-19 Citizen Science (CCS) study on the Eureka Research Platform. Eligible CCS participants will have the opportunity to be randomly assigned to be encouraged to receive either the BNT162b2 (Pfizer) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) booster vaccine and will continue to complete their weekly CCS follow up surveys on symptoms and infection. Thus, this study will allow for longitudinal follow up of participants receiving homologous and heterologous vaccine booster regimens. By randomizing participants and analyzing a larger cohort, this study aims to mitigate the effect of confounding variables and provide more conclusive evidence to guide booster recommendations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

301

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • UCSF Parnassus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be enrolled in the COVID19 Citizen Science (CCS) study. The CCS study is a remote, longitudinal, observational registry hosted on the Eureka Research Platform that administers weekly questionnaires to participants regarding COVID-19 symptoms and exposures. CCS is currently open to enrollment for adults aged 18 and older who have a smartphone device to participate on the mobile app, or an email address to participate on the web portal.
  • Must have received either 2 doses of mRNA vaccine such as Moderna and Pfizer, or 1 dose of Johnson and Johnson

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Already received a COVID19 booster
  • Are not planning on receiving a COVID19 booster in the next 3 months
  • Do not have equal access to both the Pfizer and Moderna boosters
  • Have a medical reason to receive either the Pfizer or Moderna booster
  • Have a medical reason to not receive any booster (e.g h/o allergic reaction to an mRNA vaccine or myocarditis or pericarditis after an mRNA vaccine)
  • Are unwilling to be randomized
  • Are unable to commit to filling out the CCS weekly surveys consistently (to the best of their ability)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Moderna Booster Recommendation
Participants assigned to this arm will be recommended to receive the Moderna vaccine for their Covid-19 booster shot.
Participants assigned to this intervention will be given the recommendation to receive the Moderna vaccine for their Covid-19 booster shot. The study team will not be administering vaccines to the participants; participants must have equal access to both the Pfizer and Moderna booster vaccines to be eligible for this study. According to current FDA recommendations, Moderna booster (0.25 mL) may be administered as a heterologous booster dose following completion of primary vaccination with another authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine. The dosing interval for the heterologous booster dose is the same as that authorized for a booster dose of the vaccine used for primary vaccination.
Active Comparator: Pfizer Booster Recommendation
Participants assigned to this arm will be recommended to receive the Pfizer vaccine for their Covid-19 booster shot.
Participants assigned to this intervention will be given the recommendation to receive the Pfizer vaccine for their Covid-19 booster shot. The study team will not be administering vaccines to the participants; participants must have equal access to both the Pfizer and Moderna booster vaccines to be eligible for this study. According to current FDA recommendations, the Pfizer booster (0.30 mL) may be administered as a heterologous booster dose following completion of primary vaccination with another authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine. The dosing interval for the heterologous booster dose is the same as that authorized for a booster dose of the vaccine used for primary vaccination.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-Vaccine Differences in Types of Symptoms between Pfizer and Moderna
Time Frame: 1 year
The study will assess differences in types of symptoms participants experience post-vaccination between the randomization groups (Pfizer vs. Moderna). The types of symptoms will be assessed through a questionnaire post-vaccination asking participants if they have any of the following symptoms: fever, chills, fatigue, sore/scratchy throat, muscle pain, joint pain, headache, other pain, rash, allergic reaction/anaphylaxis.
1 year
Post-Vaccine Differences in Severity of Symptoms between Pfizer and Moderna
Time Frame: 1 year
The study will assess differences in severity participants experience post-vaccination between the randomization groups (Pfizer vs. Moderna). The severity for each symptom will be assessed through a post-vaccination questionnaire asking participants how many days the participant experienced their symptoms, and how severe their symptoms were on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being mild, 5 being very severe).
1 year
Post-Vaccine Differences in Types of Symptoms between Homologous vs Heterologous Regiments
Time Frame: 1 year
The study will assess differences in types of symptoms participants experience post-vaccination between people who receive the same type of booster vaccine as their initial series (homologous) and people who receive a different type of booster vaccine than their initial series (heterologous) regiments. The types of symptoms will be assessed through a questionnaire post-vaccination asking participants if they have any of the following symptoms: fever, chills, fatigue, sore/scratchy throat, muscle pain, joint pain, headache, other pain, rash, allergic reaction/anaphylaxis.
1 year
Post-Vaccine Differences in Severity of Symptoms between Homologous vs Heterologous Regiments
Time Frame: 1 year
The study will assess differences in severity of symptoms participants experience post-vaccination between people who receive the same type of booster vaccine as their initial series (homologous) and people who receive a different type of booster vaccine than their initial series (heterologous) regiments. The severity of each symptom will be assessed through a post-vaccination questionnaire asking participants how many days the participant experienced their symptoms, and how severe their symptoms were on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being mild, 5 being very severe).
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
COVID-19 Infection Rates between Pfizer and Moderna
Time Frame: 1 year
The study will compare COVID-19 infection rates among those who receive the Moderna booster vs. the Pfizer booster
1 year
COVID-19 Infection Rates between Homologous vs Heterologous Regiments
Time Frame: 1 year
The study will compare COVID-19 infection rates among those with homologous vs. heterologous vaccine regimens.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Greg Marcus, MD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Moderna Booster Vaccine

3
Subscribe