- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05284734
Comparison of Caudal Block and Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia
March 9, 2022 updated by: Volkan Ozen, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
Comparison of Caudal Block and Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Circumcision and Lower Abdominal Surgery in Pediatric Patients: A Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
Caudal block (CB), a regional anesthesia technique, is the most commonly used neuraxial block method for postoperative pain control in sub-umbilical surgeries in children.
However, peripheral nerve blocks have been reported to be preferred in recent years in the literature since they provide longer and safer analgesia.
One of these blocks, the erector spina plane (ESP) block, has been shown to provide effective postoperative analgesia when administered from the lumbar level for sacral and lower abdominal surgeries and urogenital surgeries in pediatric patients.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Circumcision and any lower abdominal surgery in the pediatric population result in a very painful postoperative period, even when each procedure is evaluated separately.
Caudal block (CB), a regional anesthesia technique, is the most commonly used neuraxial block method for postoperative pain control in sub-umbilical surgeries in children.
However, peripheral nerve blocks have been reported to be preferred in recent years in the literature since they provide longer and safer analgesia.
One of these blocks, the erector spina plane (ESP) block, has been shown to provide effective postoperative analgesia when administered from the lumbar level for sacral and lower abdominal surgeries and urogenital surgeries in pediatric patients.
As far as we know, there is no previous study in the literature comparing CB and ESP block in pediatric patients.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34384
- Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
1 year to 7 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1-7 years of age
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II group
- Scheduled for circumcision and unilateral lower abdominal surgery at the same session
- Able to communicate in Turkish
- Willing to participate to the study (parents and children)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 1 or more than 7 years of age
- A neurological deficit, bleeding diathesis, or a history of local anesthetic allergy; an infection or redness in the injection area, congenital lumbar anomaly, liver and/or kidney disorder, a psychiatric disorder, mental retardation, or communication problems detected during examination
- Unwilling to to participate to the study ((parents or children)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Caudal block group
A 22 gauge 50 mm echogenic block needle placed through the sacrococcygeal membrane into the sacral canal in the longitudinal position, using the in-plane technique Negative aspiration was then performed 0.125% bupivacaine at a dose of 1 ml/kg was administered
|
Ultrasound-guided caudal and erector spinae blocks were administered
|
Experimental: Erector spinae block group
The erector spinae muscle and the transverse process were identified, and a 22 G, 80 mm echogenic block needle was advanced towards the transverse process until contact.
Following hydrodissection, 1 ml/kg of 0.125% bupivacaine was injected deep into the erector spinae muscle
|
Ultrasound-guided caudal and erector spinae blocks were administered
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Level of Postoperative pain
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours
|
It was assessed seven times after the operation with Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale. The lowest scale score is 0 points and the highest 10 points. Following transfer from the recovery unit to the ward, the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th and 24th hour pain levels were evaluated by the ward nurse. |
Up to 24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time of Postoperative analgesic requirement
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours
|
It was assessed seven times after the operation with Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale.
The lowest scale score is 0 points and the highest 10 points.
Significant pain behavior for the scale has been identified as 4 points or more.
Following transfer from the recovery unit to the ward, the 1st, 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hour pain levels were evaluated by the ward nurse.
Paracetamol was administered IV at a dose of 10 mg/kg if the scale score was 4 or higher.
|
Up to 24 hours
|
Rate of Postoperative complications
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours
|
Urinary retention, hematoma, ecchymosis, motor block were postoperative complications.
They were assessed by an anesthesiologist.
|
Up to 24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Volkan Özen, Asso.Prof., Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu City Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Tulgar S, Selvi O, Senturk O, Serifsoy TE, Thomas DT. Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block: Indications, Complications, and Effects on Acute and Chronic Pain Based on a Single-center Experience. Cureus. 2019 Jan 2;11(1):e3815. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3815.
- Ozen V, Yigit D. A Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block in Circumcision. Urol Int. 2020;104(11-12):871-877. doi: 10.1159/000509173. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
- Ozen V, Yigit D. Caudal epidural block versus ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block for pediatric distal hypospadias surgery: A prospective, observational study. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Aug;16(4):438.e1-438.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 May 20.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 30, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
December 15, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 9, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
March 17, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 17, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 9, 2022
Last Verified
March 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021.42
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Circumcision
-
ProgressusUnknownCircumcision, Male | Circumcision Status: Circumcised, Uncircumcised
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillBill and Melinda Gates Foundation; FHI 360; Impact Research & Development OrganizationCompletedVoluntary Medical Male Circumcision | Circumcision AdultKenya
-
Damanhour Teaching HospitalCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
University of MichiganCompletedCircumcisionUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityBill and Melinda Gates FoundationCompleted
-
King Saud UniversityUnknownCircumcision, MaleSaudi Arabia
-
Simunye Primary Health CareCompleted
Clinical Trials on Regional anesthesia intervention
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. MatteoCompleted
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectGermany
-
University of PennsylvaniaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteActive, not recruitingHip FracturesUnited States, Canada
-
Aretaieion University HospitalCompleted
-
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research...CompletedPostoperative Pain | Children, OnlyTurkey
-
Salmaniya Medical ComplexCompletedPain, Postoperative | Analgesia | Pain, AcuteBahrain
-
Fayoum University HospitalCompletedPost Operative PainEgypt
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityCompletedChronic Pain | Analgesia | Acute PainTurkey
-
American Hospital of ParisNataliya KARASHCHUK; Briana LUI; Thierry GUENOUN; Stephane ROMANORecruitingPain | Regional Anesthesia | Intraoperative MonitoringFrance
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreActive, not recruitingPeripheral Vascular DiseasesBrazil