Systematic Light Exposure in Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors (SLEPBT)

April 10, 2024 updated by: Kimberly Raghubar, Baylor College of Medicine

Systematic Light Exposure Intervention for Fatigue and Cognitive Efficiency in Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors

Children and adolescents treated for a brain tumor often experience fatigue and cognitive symptoms, such as slowed information processing and inattention. These symptoms may cause difficulty carrying out daily activities at home and at school. There are few well-researched, non-pharmacological interventions aimed at improving symptoms of fatigue and by extension cognitive symptoms. Systematic bright light exposure has been shown to improve symptoms of fatigue in adult survivors of cancer and children treated for some forms of cancer. This is a pilot/feasibility study and the first known study in children treated for a brain tumor. Findings from this study will be used to help plan a larger study to examine the effectiveness of this intervention and mechanisms of action.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  1. To evaluate feasibility and adherence in a study of systematic bright light exposure used to improve fatigue and cognitive efficiency in survivors of pediatric brain tumor, including rates of enrollment, adherence, and acceptability.

    SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  2. To estimate the effect size of change in fatigue associated with bright light exposure.
  3. To estimate the effect size of change in cognitive efficiency associated with bright light exposure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants will be randomized to take part in one of two groups:

  1. The Bright Light Group will be exposed to bright light (1,000 lux at eye level) using light glasses (Luminette Version 3) for a maximum duration of 30 minutes each day from Monday to Friday for a total of 6 weeks. Duration of light exposure will be gradually increased over the first few days until the target of 30 minutes is reached on Day 5. Light duration is for 10 mins on Days 1 & 2, 20 mins on Days 3 & 4, and finally, 30 mins on Day 5.
  2. The Dim Light Group will be exposed to dim light (equivalent intensity of <25 lux) for a maximum duration of 30 minutes. Dim light will be given in the same manner and frequency as described for the Bright Light group.

Participants will undergo the same evaluations and monitoring throughout the intervention and post-intervention follow-up. All participants will receive a pair of light glasses, with a phone app to track usage, and be fitted with an actigraph following consent to participate. Assessments will be completed at baseline (prior to intervention), with additional assessments at Week 4 (of intervention), Week 6 (end of intervention), and 2-weeks post-intervention (Week 8). Participants and their caregivers will complete questionnaires assessing fatigue, sleep, and mood. Psychological testing to measure attention, working memory, executive control, and processing speed will be completed using a computerized, online battery at each time point and in person at baseline and end of intervention. Caregivers will also be asked to complete a questionnaire about the family's general characteristics and medical history.

At baseline and end of intervention (Week 6), saliva will be collected. For each day of the intervention, participants will share their usage data and complete a daily sleep diary that includes time spent in bed, sleep/wake times, estimated amount of natural sunlight exposure, and medication use. A research coordinator will contact families on Days 2 and 5 and weekly thereafter for the duration of the intervention to identify possible light-related side effects and to check on compliance with light exposure (both frequency and duration). A remote app will be installed on the participant's or caregiver's cell phone to share light usage, which is tracked automatically once the device is turned on. At end of intervention (Week 6), participants and their caregivers will be asked to complete a short acceptability questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed and treated for a brain tumor at Texas Children's Hospital
  • Treated with either surgery only or surgery and proton beam radiation therapy
  • Treated for tumors other than high-grade gliomas, brain stem gliomas, or atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors given associated reduced survival rates
  • Currently or previously enrolled in longitudinal studies of neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of pediatric brain tumor (Lisa Kahalley, PI; H-29026, H-35681, H-40804, H-40961, H-49380, H-26785, H-41705
  • Ages 10-18 years
  • At least 1 year post-diagnosis
  • Endorsed mild to moderate symptoms of fatigue on the PROMIS
  • Approval from Long-Term Survivorship provider
  • Adequate vision for computerized tasks
  • English-speaking
  • Intelligence Quotient (IQ) above 70

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis and/or treatment for secondary malignancy in the past 12 months
  • Current or previous (within 12 months) suicidal ideation or severe depression requiring immediate intervention
  • Presence of photophobia or other eye diseases, seizures, and/or migraines
  • Use of photosensitizing medications
  • Current or previous use of light therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bright Light Exposure
Participants are exposed to bright light (1,000 lux at eye level) using light glasses (Luminette Version 3) for a maximum duration of 30 minutes upon awakening each day from Monday to Friday for 6 weeks while wearing an actigraph and periodic completion of questionnaires, cognitive assessments, and lab work.
Research coordinator will follow-up with participant on Days 2 & 5, and weekly thereafter to assess for the presence of potential side effects. If side effects are present with bright light initiation and they do not resolve by Day 5, the intervention will be discontinued.
Cognitive examinations will be completed in-person and remotely via an online platform; caregivers and participants will also be asked to complete questionnaires assessing fatigue, sleep, and mood. These outcomes will be completed at baseline (prior to intervention/placebo), Week 4, Week 6 (end of intervention/placebo), and Week 8 (2-weeks post intervention/placebo).
Other Names:
  • Cognitive tests and questionnaires
Placebo Comparator: Dim Light Exposure
Participants are exposed to exposed to dim light (equivalent intensity of <25 lux) using light glasses (Luminette) for a maximum duration of 30 minutes upon awakening each day from Monday to Friday for 6 weeks while wearing an actigraph and periodic completion of questionnaires, cognitive assessments, and lab work.
Cognitive examinations will be completed in-person and remotely via an online platform; caregivers and participants will also be asked to complete questionnaires assessing fatigue, sleep, and mood. These outcomes will be completed at baseline (prior to intervention/placebo), Week 4, Week 6 (end of intervention/placebo), and Week 8 (2-weeks post intervention/placebo).
Other Names:
  • Cognitive tests and questionnaires
A placebo pair of glasses that is identical in form to the bright light glasses with the exception of light intensity will be used in a manner identical to the bright light glasses.
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of approached participants who consent to study participation
Time Frame: Once, prior to enrollment
The rates of study participation and related 90% Blyth-Still-Casella intervals, as well as their regular 90% confidence interval, will be estimated. Test of one proportion will be performed against an estimated rate of 70%. The rate will be evaluated for the group as a whole as well as separately for the bright light intervention and placebo-control groups.
Once, prior to enrollment
Percent of sessions completed during all 6 weeks of bright or dim light exposure
Time Frame: At completion of bright or dim light exposure (Week 6)
The rates of light intervention adherence and related 90% Blyth-Still-Casella intervals, as well as their regular 90% confidence interval, will be estimated. Test of one proportion will be performed against an estimated rate of 77% of sessions completed on average. The rate will be evaluated for the group as a whole as well as separately for the bright light intervention and placebo-control groups.
At completion of bright or dim light exposure (Week 6)
Percent of participants rating the intervention as acceptable by indicating that they would recommend this intervention to other survivors.
Time Frame: Once, at completion of intervention (Week 6)
The rates of completion of cognitive assessments and related 90% Blyth-Still-Casella intervals, as well as their regular 90% confidence interval, will be estimated. Test of one proportion will be performed against an estimated rate of 75%. The rate will be evaluated for the group as a whole as well as separately for the bright light intervention and placebo-control groups.
Once, at completion of intervention (Week 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fatigue outcome
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to start of intervention) compared to Week 4 (common length of intervention in adult literature)
For the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Scale, the raw score is converted to a standardized T-score (range 34-85) with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, where a higher score represents greater severity of symptoms. The effect size (Cohen's d- the standardized difference between two means) of bright light exposure on fatigue will be estimated by comparing performance at baseline to that at Week 4 (comparison point in adult literature), using the paired difference divided by its estimated standard deviation. In addition, given potential for missing data, a mixed-effect model will be fit to investigate change in outcome from baseline to Week 4.
Baseline (prior to start of intervention) compared to Week 4 (common length of intervention in adult literature)
Change in fatigue outcome
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to start of intervention) compared to Week 6 (end of intervention)
For the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Scale, the raw score is converted to a standardized T-score (range 34-85) with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, where a higher score represents greater severity of symptoms. The effect size (Cohen's d- the standardized difference between two means) of bright light exposure on fatigue will be estimated by comparing performance at baseline to that at Week 6 (end of systematic light exposure), using the paired difference divided by its estimated standard deviation. In addition, given potential for missing data, a mixed-effect model will be fit to investigate change in outcome from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline (prior to start of intervention) compared to Week 6 (end of intervention)
Change in neurobehavioral outcome
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to start of intervention) compared to Week 4 (common length of intervention in adult literature)
Attention serves as the primary neurobehavioral endpoint, and it is measured by Omissions T-score (M = 50, SD = 10) from the Conners Continuous Performance Test, Third Edition (CPT-3), where higher scores indicate worse performance (<45 is low and 70+ is very elevated). The effect size (Cohen's d- the standardized difference between two means) of bright light exposure on attention will be estimated by comparing performance at baseline to that at Week 4 (comparison point in adult literature), using the paired difference divided by its estimated standard deviation. In addition, given potential for missing data, a mixed-effect model will be fit to investigate change in outcome from baseline to Week 4.
Baseline (prior to start of intervention) compared to Week 4 (common length of intervention in adult literature)
Change in neurobehavioral outcome
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to start of intervention) compared to Week 6 (end of intervention)
Attention serves as the primary neurobehavioral endpoint, and it is measured by Omissions T-score (M = 50, SD = 10) from the Conners Continuous Performance Test, Third Edition (CPT-3), where higher scores indicate worse performance (<45 is low and 70+ is very elevated). The effect size (Cohen's d- the standardized difference between two means) of bright light exposure on attention will be estimated by comparing performance at baseline to that at Week 6 (comparison point in adult literature), using the paired difference divided by its estimated standard deviation. In addition, given potential for missing data, a mixed-effect model will be fit to investigate change in outcome from baseline to Week 6.
Baseline (prior to start of intervention) compared to Week 6 (end of intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kimberly P Raghubar, PhD, Baylor College of Medicine - Texas Children's Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Heather M Conklin, PhD, St. Jude Children'S Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The investigators will share de-identified data for all IPD that underlie results in a publication upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Upon request to PI

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Tumor

Clinical Trials on Bright Light Exposure

3
Subscribe