Clinical Feasibility of Brain Radiotherapy Using Synthetic CTs in an MRI-only Workflow

Feasibility Study of an MRI-only Workflow: Use of Synthetic CTs Generated From MRI Data for MRI-based Radiotherapy

The goal of this observational study is to show the feasibility of an MRI-only workflow in brain radiotherapy. The main question it aims to answer is:

  • Is an MRI-only workflow based on deep learning sCTs feasible in clinical routine? Participants will be treated as in clinical routine, but treatment planning will be based on sCTs, that are generated from MRI images. The dosimetrical equivalence to the standard CT based workflow will be tested at several points in the study.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this clinical study is to investigate the clinical feasibility of a deep learning-based MRI-only workflow for brain radiotherapy, that eliminates the registration uncertainty through calculation of a synthetic CT (sCT) from MRI data.

A total of 54 patients with an indication for radiation treatment of the brain and stereotactic mask immobilization will be recruited. All study patients will receive standard therapy and imaging including both CT and MRI. All patients will receive dedicated RT-MRI scans in treatment position. An sCT will be reconstructed from an acquired MRI DIXON-sequence using a commercially available deep learning solution on which subsequent radiotherapy planning will be performed. Through multiple quality assurance (QA) measures and reviews during the course of the study, the feasibility of an MRI-only workflow and comparative parameters between sCT and standard CT workflow will be investigated holistically. These QA measures include feasibility and quality of image guidance (IGRT) at the linear accelerator using sCT derived digitally reconstructed radiographs in addition to potential dosimetric deviations between the CT and sCT plan. The aim of this clinical study is to establish a brain MRI-only workflow as well as to identify risks and QA mechanisms to ensure a safe integration of deep learning-based sCT into radiotherapy planning and delivery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Erlangen, Germany, 91054
        • Erlangen, Universitätsklinikum Strahlenklinik

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • Patient older than 18 years
  • Tumor or metastases in the brain
  • Immobilization with stereotactic mask
  • Treatment on stereotactic linear accelerator (2.5 mm leafs) equipped with 2D/2D X-ray system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metal in the body, metal implants, pacemakers or other patient-specific factors that are a contraindication to an MRI scan
  • Metal implants, pacemakers or other patient-specific factors associated with increased risk from an MRI scan
  • Renal insufficiency (eGFR < 60 ml/min), allergy or other patient-specific factors that constitute a contraindication to contrast administration
  • Renal insufficiency (eGFR < 60 ml/min), allergy or other patient-specific factors associated with an increased risk from contrast administration
  • Patients who are institutionalized in care facilities, prisons or other supervised facilities.
  • Patients under guardianship
  • Non-consenting patients
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: sCT workflow
brain radiotherapy planned on synthetic CTs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients that can successfully be treated in an MRI-only workflow
Time Frame: 12 month

All criteria have to be met for the MRI-only workflow to be classified as successful:

Verification criteria that will be assessed:

  1. Can the sCT be generated and is the sCT clinically utilizable?
  2. Are the three rotations needed for CT-MRI registration each ≤ 3°?
  3. Can a treatment plan be generated and verified using the sCT?
  4. Is the dosimetric difference between sCT and CT based treatment plan in the planning target volume ≤ 3%?
  5. Is the dosimetric difference between the sCT and CT based treatment plan in affected organs at risk (receiving > 10% of prescribed dose) ≤ 3%?
  6. Are the couch correction parameters during patient positioning in the rotational degrees of freedom ≤ 3°?
12 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reasons that lead to unfeasibility of an MRI-only workflow
Time Frame: 12 month
Presence (Yes/No) of individual reasons responsible for the unfeasibility of the MRI-only workflow, as assessed with a predefined checklist.
12 month
Dosimetric differences between MRI-only and standard workflow for radiotherapy treatment planning
Time Frame: 12 month
Paired difference in Dose-volume-histogram parameters (Target coverage, mean, median, near maximum and minimum dose) between MRI-only and standard radiotherapy treatment workflow.
12 month
Measurement of intra-MRI patient positional changes
Time Frame: 12 month
Patient shift (vector magnitude) and rotational errors occuring during the course of MRI acquisition due to patient movement, as assessed by rigid registration of the last acquired MRI sequence in reference to the first sequence.
12 month
Organ at risk contouring accuracy on MRI data
Time Frame: 12 month
Similarity of organ at risk segmentations defined in MRI compared to reference segmentations defined in CT as assessed by the volumetric and surface Dice score, as well as mean surface and Hausdorff distances.
12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christoph Bert, Prof. Dr. rer. nat, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik
  • Principal Investigator: Florian Putz, PD Dr. med., Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Tumor, Primary

Clinical Trials on brain radiotherapy

3
Subscribe