Mechanism of Analgesic Effect on Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation

It has been shown that prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation (pcTBS) , a relatively new repetitive transcranial magnetic simulation (rTMS) protocol, of the primary motor cortex (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) decreases pain in healthy volunteers, in various experimental models. In addition, rTMS of M1 has also been shown to have analgesic effects in various chronic pain conditions, including neuropathic pain.The mechanisms underlying rTMS-induced analgesia remain unclear. Functional neuroimaging studies have shown that rTMS of M1 and DLPFC induces changes in the activity of cortical and subcortical structures involved in pain processing and modulation. Endogenous opioids and e N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor are known to play a major role in these processes. The investigator hypothesized that the endogenous opioids systems (EOS) and NMDA receptor might be involved in the analgesic action of pcTBS. In the first part,the investigator compares the analgesic effects of motor cortex (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation before and after naloxone or placebo treatment, the intensity of pain induced by capsaicin were used to evaluate the analgesic effects of pcTBS. If naloxone does not reverse the analgesic effect of pcTBS,The volunteers will be invited to participant the second part of the study, which the investigator compares the analgesic effects of motor cortex (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation before and after Ketamine treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study comprised 3 parallel arms corresponding to 3 types of stimulation: active stimulation of M1, active stimulation of DLPFC-pcTBS, and sham stimulation (of M1 or DLPFC). Volunteers were randomly assigned to the 3 arms. In the first part, these volunteers participated in 2 experimental sessions 1 weeks apart, in which we compared the effects of naloxone and placebo (saline), administered according to a randomized, double-blind crossover design, on pcTBS-induced analgesia. Each experimental session started with the determination of baseline pain intensity and cortical excitability as well as plasma opioid peptide concentrations. Ten minutes before pcTBS (of M1, DLPFC, or sham), the volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of either placebo (ie, saline) or naloxone, which was continued throughout the rTMS session (2 minutes). The participant was then allowed to rest for 60 minutes. Posttreatment pain intensity, cortical excitability and plasma opioid peptide concentrations will be determined by the same procedure used at baseline.In the second part, ketamine will be delivered the same as the first part.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1)woman or man over 18 and under 85 years old; 2)Clinical diagnosis of physical and mental health people; 3) able to cooperate in completing questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

1)Clinical diagnosis of psychiatric disorder including major depression; 2) History of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs); 3) Past treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); 4) Contraindications to rTMS (previous severe head trauma or neurosurgical intervention, past or current epilepsy, active brain tumor, intracranial hypertension, implanted ferromagnetic devices, e.g., cardiac pacemaker, neurostimulator, or cochlear implants); 5) Any difficulty to fill out questionnaires (due to language or cognitive problems);

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: active stimulation of M1
pcTBS was administered to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline.
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of naloxone, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of placebo (saline), which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of ketamine, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
Prolonged continuous theta-burst stimulation (pcTBS) was administered to the left M1 at 80% RMT, consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline
Experimental: active stimulation of DLPFC
pcTBS was administered to the left DLPFC at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline.
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of naloxone, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of placebo (saline), which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of ketamine, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
Prolonged continuous theta-burst stimulation (pcTBS) was administered to the left DLPFC at 80% RMT, consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline
Sham Comparator: SHAM stimulation
The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same protocol, with the coil being orientated at 90° to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scal
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of naloxone, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of placebo (saline), which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of ketamine, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same pcTBS protocol, with the coil being flipped 90◦to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scalp

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain intensity at baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
pain intensity on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) extending from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain possible) at baseline.
Baseline
pain intensity at the posttreatment of pcTBS
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
pain intensity on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) extending from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain possible) at the posttreatment of pcTBS.
through study completion, an average of 8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor-evoked potential (MEP)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Corticospinal excitability will be measured with MEP at rest of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle, A total of 20 single pulses were consecutively delivered to the hand region of the left M1 at 120% RMT (45° to the midline, handle pointing backward).
through study completion, an average of 8 months
Cortical silent period (CSP)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
Corticospinal excitability will be measured with CSP during a sustained voluntary FDI muscle contraction, A total of 20 single pulses were consecutively delivered to the hand region of the left M1 at 120% RMT (45° to the midline, handle pointing backward).
through study completion, an average of 8 months
Maximum plasma concentration of opioid peptide at baseline
Time Frame: baseline
plasma opioid peptide concentrations will be measured using ELISA at baseline.
baseline
Maximum plasma concentration of opioid peptide at the posttreatment of pcTBS
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months
plasma opioid peptide concentrations will be measured using ELISA at the last posttreatment of pcTBS.
through study completion, an average of 8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: min yan, prof, The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe