The Effects of Video-based Yoga Interventions for Patients With Post-corona Virus Disease (Yoga)

May 26, 2022 updated by: Habibe Serap Inal, Istinye University

The Effects of Video-based Yoga Interventions on Musculoskeletal Pain and Quality of Life of Patients' Post-corona Virus Disease: a Semi-randomized Controlled Prospective Study

Aimed to understand if yoga exercises are superior to posture exercises as an alternative exercise therapy for relieving musculoskeletal pain, improving functional status, and improving quality of life during the post- corona virus disease (COVID-19) period?

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Eighty five of 200 post- COVID-19 patients, who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria obtained from the records of the State Hospital. The participants were divided into video-based (VB) yoga (n=40), home-based (HB) posture exercise (n=28), and control (n=17) groups. The socio-demographic characteristics, pain status, walking and balance, and quality of life were evaluated twice, once before and eight weeks after the exercises.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

85

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34010
        • Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istinye University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • recently diagnosed with Covid-19 and discharged from the hospital;
  • being at level 0: neglected functional limitation or level 1: negligible functional limitation on the Post-Covid-19 Functional Status Scale,
  • referred for physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having any type of surgery in the last six months,
  • being pregnant,
  • being level 2 or above on the Post-Covid-19 Functional Status Scale

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Video-based Yoga
video-based yoga (n=40) given for patients in post-covid-19 status for 8 weeks
They were trained face-to-face with social distancing and a maximum of three participants. They were observed while practicing and necessary alerts and corrections were made. Documents related to the videos for yoga exercises and posture exercises specially prepared for this study by the qualified physiotherapist (MD) were provided to the participants
Other Names:
  • Home-based posture exercises
  • Control group without any activity
EXPERIMENTAL: Home-based postur exercises
Home exzercises were given for 8 weeks
They were trained face-to-face with social distancing and a maximum of three participants. They were observed while practicing and necessary alerts and corrections were made. Documents related to the videos for yoga exercises and posture exercises specially prepared for this study by the qualified physiotherapist (MD) were provided to the participants
Other Names:
  • Home-based posture exercises
  • Control group without any activity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Assessment by McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of pain by McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire: The localization (deep-D; superficial-S) of the pain was determined by a question in the first section of the questionnaire. Subsequently, the features (20 words and 2-6 sub words of each) and severity (mild to unbearable pain, Likert scale-5) of the pain were determined by questions in the second and third section of the questionnaire. In the fourth section, the relationship between pain, time, frequency, and the affecting factors was determined. Scores (total 0-112) obtained from the sections of the survey were collected. The pain level of the patients indicated that the higher the pain, the higher the score.
Baseline
Balance and gait assessment
Time Frame: At the beginning of the interventions
Balance and Gait Assessment: The total scores for balance and walking were 0-29 and 0-9, respectively. These scores aimed to reflect the fear of falling. There was no specific cutoff score. As the score increased, the fear of falling decreased.
At the beginning of the interventions
Quality of life assessment by WHOQOL-BREF
Time Frame: Baseline
The WHOQOL-short form consists of 26 questions and measures the physical, mental, social, and environmental well-being of the adult population. The Turkish version has 27 questions. The 27th is termed the Environment-Turkish. Each area refers to the quality of life in a respective field independently. The area scores are calculated between 1 and 100 by The World Health Organization Quality of Life-short form: The higher the score, the higher the quality of life.
Baseline
Muscle Power assessment by handheld dynamometer (MicroFet 2; kgm, Hoggan Scientific, Salt Lake City, UT, USA)
Time Frame: Baseline
The participants performed maximal isometric voluntary contractions (for lower extremity: M. quadriceps femoris, hamstring group muscles, M. tibialis anterior, M. gastrocnemius, and M. soleus; for upper extremity: M. triceps brachii, M. biceps brachii, and M. deltoideus: anterior, middle, and posterior heads) forcefully against the dynamometer. The dynamometer was held stationary by the physical therapist.
Baseline
Pain Assessmentby McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of pain by McGill-Melzack Pain Questinnaire: The localization (deep-D; superficial-S) of the pain was determined by a question in the first section of the questionnaire. Subsequently, the features (20 words and 2-6 sub words of each) and severity (mild to unbearable pain, Likert scale-5) of the pain were determined by questions in the second and third section of the questionnaire. In the fourth section, the relationship between pain, time, frequency, and the affecting factors was determined. Scores (total 0-112) obtained from the sections of the survey were collected. The pain level of the patients indicated that the higher the pain, the higher the score.
Baseline
Balance and gait assessment by TBGA
Time Frame: Balance
Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment: The total scores for balance and walking were 0-29 and 0-9, respectively. These scores aimed to reflect the fear of falling. There was no specific cutoff score. As the score increased, the fear of falling decreased.
Balance
Quality of life assessment of WHOQOL-BREF
Time Frame: Baseline
The WHOQOL-short form consists of 26 questions and measures the physical, mental, social, and environmental well-being of the adult population. The Turkish version has 27 questions. The 27th is termed the Environment-Turkish. Each area refers to the quality of life in a respective field independently. The area scores are calculated between 1 and 100. by The World Health Organization Quality of Life-short form: The higher the score, the higher the quality of life.
Baseline
Muscle Power assessment by handheld dynamometer (MicroFet 2; kgm; Hoggan Scientific, Salt Lake City, USA)
Time Frame: Baseline
The participants performed maximal isometric voluntary contractions (for lower extremity: M. quadriceps femoris, hamstring group muscles, M. tibialis anterior, M. gastrocnemius, and M. soleus; for upper extremity: M. triceps brachii, M. biceps brachii, and M. deltoideus: anterior, middle, and posterior heads) forcefully against the dynamometer. The dynamometer was held stationary by the physical therapist.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 22, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 22, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 24, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Video-based Yoga Exercises

Subscribe