Continuous Wireless Monitoring of Vital Signs and Automated Alerts in Participants at Home and During Hospitalization

April 8, 2025 updated by: Katja Kjær Grønbæk, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg

WARD Prospective Study - Continuous Wireless Monitoring of Vital Signs and Automated Alerts in Participants at Home and During Hospitalization

The primary aim of this study is to test and assess the implementation and effectiveness of continuous wireless vital signs monitoring with real-time alerts on:

The frequency of patients monitored with adequate data quality as adequate clinical user satisfaction in the initial versus the last part of the trial (primary outcome).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Over the last years, the applicants and research team partners have developed the WARD (Wireless Assessment of Respiratory and circulatory Distress) project, using continuous wireless monitoring of vital signs and artificial intelligence algorithms for data interpretation in high-risk patient admitted to medical and surgical wards. The WARD project combines continuous measurements of 10 different physiological modalities with machine learning to develop the WARD-Clinical Support System (WARD-CSS), based on multiple intelligent algorithms, that automatically monitors, interprets, predicts and alert clinical staff. Through a mobile device with a purpose-built Graphic User Interface (GUI), the WARD-CSS stimulates human-machine interaction to improve the monitoring of high-risk hospitalized patients.

The WARD project has hitherto proven an unmet need for continuous monitoring and the potential for automatic detection and prediction of physiological deterioration events. Specifically, observational pilot studies of both patients with acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD) and postoperative abdominal cancer surgery patients have shown that episodes of desaturation, tachycardia, tachypnea, and bradypnea are much more frequently detected using continuous vital signs monitoring than with existing Early Warning Score (EWS) systems.

Ongoing investigations will determine the efficacy in two very selected populations of high-risk surgical patients and acutely ill medical patients with severe disease. This study will investigate the WARD-systems' implementation, and effectiveness of use and impact in a cohort of patientparticipants admitted

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

3095

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients assessed by the clinical staff as having an acute condition with risk for clinical deterioration and being either at home (with no apparent need for hospitalization), and/or in hospital

OR

Patients at either at home before, in-hospital and/or after hospitalization for elective major surgery, defined as surgery lasting more than one hour under general- or regional anaesthesia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult participants (≥18 years)
  • Patients assessed by the clinical staff as having an acute condition with risk for clinical deterioration and being either at home (with no apparent need for hospitalization), and/or in hospital OR
  • Patients at either at home before, in-hospital and/or after hospitalization for elective major surgery, defined as surgery lasting more than one hour under general- or regional anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The participant expected not to cooperate with study procedures.
  • Allergy to plaster or silicone.
  • Having pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) device.
  • Inability to give informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Data quality
Time Frame: 30 days
The number (frequency) of patients having adequate data quality (defined as at least 60% of the monitoring time with simultaneous recording of SpO2, respiratory rate, heart rate)
30 days
user satisfaction
Time Frame: 30 days
Number of users with adequate clinical user satisfaction (defined as the nurse in charge of the patient at the end of monitoring answers "Agree" or "Strongly agree" to the question "WARD-monitoring was beneficial for monitoring of vital signs in this patientparticipant (response options: Strongly Disagree - Disagree - Neutral - Agree - Strongly Agree)).
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 27, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 22, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2203648

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Will be decided upon reasonable request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infections

Clinical Trials on Vital signs measurements with new app

Subscribe