- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05448469
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Splenectomy
December 21, 2022 updated by: Amin Mohammed Alansary Amin Ahmed Helwa, Ain Shams University
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Perioperative Analgesia, a Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial
There are very few randomized controlled trials in open splenectomy surgery, which compare paravertebral block with ESP block.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block with ESP block for perioperative analgesia in open splenectomy .
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
99
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt
- Ain Shams University Hospitals
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients who will be scheduled for indicated open splenectomy surgery in the supine position via left subcostal ,midline or letf subcostal with midline extention incisions
- physical status American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II or III.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who refuse to participate
- patients with body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2
- infection at the site of injection
- coagulopathy, severe thrombocytopenia <50×103
- spine deformity
- history of opioid dependence
- polytrauma patients with dorsal spine fracture
- urgent abdominal exploration for splenectomy in heamodynamically unstable patients
- history of allergy to opioids or local anesthetics
- history of allergy to opioids, or local anaesthetics.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: general anesthesia+ bilateral US guided erector spinae plane block
General anesthesia plus ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.2% at T9
|
patients will receive combined general anesthesia and ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.2 % at T9 level bilaterally.
|
|
Active Comparator: general anesthesia+ bilateral US guided paravertebral block
General anesthesia plus bilateral US guided paravertebral block with 7 ml bupivacaine 0.2% at T8 and T10
|
patients will receive combined general anesthesia and ultrasound guided paravertebral block with 7 ml of bupivacaine 0.2 % at T8 and T10 bilaterally.
|
|
Active Comparator: general anesthesia
general anesthesia plus conventional analgesia
|
patients will receive combined general anesthesia and conventional analgesia
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
First time to analgesic requirement
Time Frame: 1st 24 hour
|
all patients received an IV -PCA system (Accufuser M8P, 60 mL; Woo Young Meditech Co, S.Korea).
PCA was prepared with 60 mL of isotonic saline containing 60 mg morphine, and the selected system was adjusted to infuse a 1 mL bolus dose with a lockout interval of 15 minutes while the basal flow rate was switched off.
Breakthrough pain was managed with 2mg morphine.
|
1st 24 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
total analgesic consumption
Time Frame: 1st 24 hour
|
The total dose of rescue analgesics(morphine) required in 24 hours will be recorded.
|
1st 24 hour
|
|
Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 1st 24 hour
|
All patients will be monitored in the postoperative period for pain by the NRS score at rest and movement at immediate postoperative (0 min), 30 min, 1, 2, 6,12, and 24 hours.
|
1st 24 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 10, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 10, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
December 10, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 2, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
July 7, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
December 23, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 21, 2022
Last Verified
December 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R 97/2022
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Analgesia
-
University Hospital, CaenNot yet recruitingPostoperative Care | Postoperative Analgesia | Analgesia Assessment | PosthectomyFrance
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalEnrolling by invitationEpidural Analgesia | Learning Curve | Epidural Analgesia for Labour and DeliveryUnited States
-
Dr. John A. Thiel Medical Professional CorporationNot yet recruiting
-
Tanta UniversityRecruiting
-
SSM Health Bone and Joint Hospital at St AnthonyRecruitingAnalgesiaUnited States
-
Makassed General HospitalRecruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesCompleted
-
Abd-Elazeem Abd-Elhameed ElbakryActive, not recruiting
Clinical Trials on conventional analgesia
-
Udayana UniversityCompletedInflammation | Chronic Pain | Inflammatory Response | Acute PainIndonesia
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain | Analgesia | SurgeryKorea, Republic of
-
University of PadovaRecruitingLabor Analgesia | Expectations | Postpartum Depression (PPD)Italy
-
Fenerbahce UniversityThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of TurkeyNot yet recruitingChronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Erzurum Technical UniversityAtaturk University; Bangor University; Amasya UniversityEnrolling by invitationNeck Pain | Chronic Neck Pain | Muscle Stiffness | Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve StimulationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
The Chaim Sheba Medical CenterNot yet recruitingFetal Heart Rate Abnormalities | Labor Epidural Analgesia | Maternal Hypotension
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptRecruitingShoulder Pain | Thoracotomy | Interscalene Block | Anterior Suprascapular BlockEgypt
-
Nanjing Medical UniversityHRSA/Maternal and Child Health BureauCompleted
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityCompleted
-
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la RechercheNot yet recruitingGonarthrosis | Total Knee ArthroplastyFrance