Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Splenectomy

December 21, 2022 updated by: Amin Mohammed Alansary Amin Ahmed Helwa, Ain Shams University

Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Perioperative Analgesia, a Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial

There are very few randomized controlled trials in open splenectomy surgery, which compare paravertebral block with ESP block. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block with ESP block for perioperative analgesia in open splenectomy .

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

99

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Ain Shams University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who will be scheduled for indicated open splenectomy surgery in the supine position via left subcostal ,midline or letf subcostal with midline extention incisions
  • physical status American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II or III.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who refuse to participate
  • patients with body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2
  • infection at the site of injection
  • coagulopathy, severe thrombocytopenia <50×103
  • spine deformity
  • history of opioid dependence
  • polytrauma patients with dorsal spine fracture
  • urgent abdominal exploration for splenectomy in heamodynamically unstable patients
  • history of allergy to opioids or local anesthetics
  • history of allergy to opioids, or local anaesthetics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: general anesthesia+ bilateral US guided erector spinae plane block
General anesthesia plus ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.2% at T9
patients will receive combined general anesthesia and ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.2 % at T9 level bilaterally.
Active Comparator: general anesthesia+ bilateral US guided paravertebral block
General anesthesia plus bilateral US guided paravertebral block with 7 ml bupivacaine 0.2% at T8 and T10
patients will receive combined general anesthesia and ultrasound guided paravertebral block with 7 ml of bupivacaine 0.2 % at T8 and T10 bilaterally.
Active Comparator: general anesthesia
general anesthesia plus conventional analgesia
patients will receive combined general anesthesia and conventional analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
First time to analgesic requirement
Time Frame: 1st 24 hour
all patients received an IV -PCA system (Accufuser M8P, 60 mL; Woo Young Meditech Co, S.Korea). PCA was prepared with 60 mL of isotonic saline containing 60 mg morphine, and the selected system was adjusted to infuse a 1 mL bolus dose with a lockout interval of 15 minutes while the basal flow rate was switched off. Breakthrough pain was managed with 2mg morphine.
1st 24 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
total analgesic consumption
Time Frame: 1st 24 hour
The total dose of rescue analgesics(morphine) required in 24 hours will be recorded.
1st 24 hour
Numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 1st 24 hour
All patients will be monitored in the postoperative period for pain by the NRS score at rest and movement at immediate postoperative (0 min), 30 min, 1, 2, 6,12, and 24 hours.
1st 24 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R 97/2022

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on conventional analgesia

Subscribe