Effectiveness of Endonasal Polymeric Implant for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

July 4, 2022 updated by: Luiz Eduardo Florio Junior, University of Sao Paulo

Effectiveness of Endonasal Polymeric Implant in the Treatment of Chronic Eosinophilic and Central Compartment Rhinosinusitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate a steroid-embedded Terpolymers polymer implant of L-lactide and trimethynele carbonate (TCM) at the level of disease control in patients with eosinophilic and central compartment chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) after placement of the endonasal device, compared to a control group (placebo). The secondary objectives of this study are to assess comfort, perception of improvement and satisfaction, as well as adverse events.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial will be carried out, with a blinded participant, therapist and evaluator. Patients over 18 years of age, with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who have already undergone endoscopic sinus surgery (CENS), but who do not have the disease under control and, therefore, with an indication for a new CENS, will be selected. Participants will come from the otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic of the academic and public service of the University of São Paulo - USP. Eligible patients will receive either the Terpolymers L-lactide and trimethynele carbonate (TCM) polymer implant placement or the placebo polymer. The primary outcome will be the control of the symptoms of chronic uncontrolled rhinosinusitis that will be evaluated through the NOSE Questionnaire, a nasal endoscopic evaluation based on the Lund-Kennedy criteria and the SNOT-22 Questionnaire. The sample size calculation was performed based on a difference between the intervention and placebo groups of 30% for cases that achieved disease control, resulting in a sample of 36 participants (18 in each group). Data will be analyzed using mixed linear models.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

36

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
        • Recruiting
        • Luiz Eduardo Flório Junior
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery, but who do not have the disease under control. The uncontrolled disease and its respective classification regarding the degree of the disease will be carried out through 3 assessments: 1) Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Questionnaire (NOSE) validated version in Portuguese; 2) nasal endoscopic evaluation; and, 3) Sino Nasal Outcome Test Questionnaire (SNOT-22). Through the NOSE questionnaire, the patient's disease will be classified as "Controlled", "Partially Controlled" or "Uncontrolled (Uncontrolled)". Any variation in the endoscopic evaluation score based on the Lund-Kennedy Criteria will be considered an alteration. And for the SNOT-22 Questionnaire, changes will be considered when the total score varies by at least 11 points. Patients who present these 3 alterations will be considered to have the 'uncontrolled disease' and, therefore, will be eligible for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with malformations, trauma and/or tumors in the nasal and paranasal sinuses will be excluded;
  • Patients with a history of recent nasal surgery up to 6 months previously, with glaucoma and cataracts.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: L-lactide and trimethynele carbonate Terpolymers polymer implant
The polymer implant will be placed in the ethmoidal region, at the same time that the nasal endoscopic examination will be performed. The polymer in this study is biocompatible. The polymers will be made in the biomaterials laboratory located at the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC-SP), located in the city of Sorocaba-SP. Polymers will be provided free of charge for the study.
The L-lactide and trimethynele carbonate (TCM) Terpolymers polymer implant will be placed in the ethmoidal region, at the same time that the nasal endoscopic examination will be performed.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo polymer implant
Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nasal Obstruction
Time Frame: Day 15 after intervention

Nasal Obstruction, Sistemic medication and Endoscopy (NOSE) questionnaire. NOSE is a method of evaluating the clinical control of chronic rhinosinusitis and is based on the evaluation of three aspects: nasal obstruction, nasal endoscopy and the need for systemic medication (antibiotics or steroids).

The NOSE questionnaire consists of five questions concerning subjective assessment of the nasal obstruction within the past month. Each question can be answered usinga 5-point Likert scale from"0"(not a problem) up to"4"(severe problems with breathing). After addition of allitem values and multiplying the raw score with 5, severity of the patient's complaints can be scaled to range from 0 to 100. A score of 0 indicates no obstructivenasal problems and a score of 100 implies severe problems.

Day 15 after intervention
Nasal Endoscopic Evaluation
Time Frame: Day 15 after intervention
The nasal endoscopic evaluation will be performed under topical anesthesia, with a rigid endoscope (4mm, 0° and/or 45°; Karl Storz) and its classification will be based on the Lund - Kennedy criteria. For this evaluation, each nostril is examined separately and three possible characteristics may be present, they are: polyps, nasal mucosa edema and/or secretion. For each evaluated characteristic, a score from 0 to 2 is assigned. For the evaluation of polyps, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=restricted to the middle meatus; and, 2=extension to nasal cavity. For the evaluation of nasal mucosa edema, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=mild or moderate edema; and 2= polypoid degeneration. For the evaluation of secretion, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=hyaline secretion; and, 2=mucopurulent or thick secretion.
Day 15 after intervention
Sino Nasal Outcome Test
Time Frame: Day 15 after intervention
Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) The SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a modification of the SNOT-20, with 2 additional items on nasal obstruction and problems with smell and taste. The questionnaire assesses 22 items related to nasal symptoms that can impact the patient's personal and social life. Each item can get a score ranging from 0 (least possible problem) to 5 (greatest possible problem). Thus, this questionnaire has a final score that can range from 0 to 110 points. In this study, a significant clinical improvement will be considered when there is at least a variation of 11 points from one assessment to another.23 The validity and reliability of the SNOT-22 have already been previously tested in Portuguese.
Day 15 after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morning serum level of cortisol, albumin and serum globulin
Time Frame: Day 15 after intervention
blood test
Day 15 after intervention
Morning serum level of cortisol, albumin and serum globulin
Time Frame: Day 60 after intervention
blood test
Day 60 after intervention
ACTH - adrenocorticotropic hormone
Time Frame: Day 15 and 60 aftern intervention
blood test
Day 15 and 60 aftern intervention
ACTH - adrenocorticotropic hormone
Time Frame: Day 15 after intervention
blood test
Day 15 after intervention
Complete blood count
Time Frame: Day 60 after intervention

A complete blood count (CBC) is a blood test used to evaluate your overall health and detect a wide range of disorders, including anemia, infection and leukemia.

A complete blood count test measures several components and features of your blood, including:

Red blood cells, which carry oxygen White blood cells, which fight infection Hemoglobin, the oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells Hematocrit, the proportion of red blood cells to the fluid component, or plasma, in your blood Platelets, which help with blood clotting

Day 60 after intervention
total and serum IgE (blood test)
Time Frame: Day 15 after intervention
blood test
Day 15 after intervention
total and serum IgE (blood test)
Time Frame: Day 60 after intervention
blood test
Day 60 after intervention
Cortisol level in 24-hour urine
Time Frame: Day 15 after intervention
urine test
Day 15 after intervention
Cortisol level in 24-hour urine
Time Frame: Day 60 after intervention
urine test
Day 60 after intervention
Intraocular pressure profile - IOP
Time Frame: Day 15 after intervention
ophthalmologic assessment - fluid overload test and the lens by slit lamp examination
Day 15 after intervention
Intraocular pressure profile - IOP
Time Frame: Day 60 after intervention
ophthalmologic assessment - fluid overload test and the lens by slit lamp examination
Day 60 after intervention
Patient comfort
Time Frame: Day 15 after intervention
self-reported on an analog scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates very uncomfortable and 100 indicates very comfortable
Day 15 after intervention
Patient comfort
Time Frame: Day 60 after intervention
self-reported on an analog scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates very uncomfortable and 100 indicates very comfortable
Day 60 after intervention
Patient self-reported perception of improvement and satisfaction with the implant
Time Frame: Day 15 after intervention
Measured on an analog scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no change in symptoms and dissatisfaction, and 100 indicates resolved symptoms and satisfaction
Day 15 after intervention
Patient self-reported perception of improvement and satisfaction with the implant
Time Frame: Day 60 after intervention
Measured on an analog scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no change in symptoms and dissatisfaction, and 100 indicates resolved symptoms and satisfaction
Day 60 after intervention
Adverse events
Time Frame: Day 15 after intervention
Adverse events will be measured through changes in blood and urine tests and also on a self-reported basis.
Day 15 after intervention
Adverse events
Time Frame: Day 60 after intervention
Adverse events will be measured through changes in blood and urine tests and also on a self-reported basis.
Day 60 after intervention
Nasal Obstruction
Time Frame: Day 45 after intervention

Nasal Obstruction, Sistemic medication and Endoscopy (NOSE) questionnaire. NOSE is a method of evaluating the clinical control of chronic rhinosinusitis and is based on the evaluation of three aspects: nasal obstruction, nasal endoscopy and the need for systemic medication (antibiotics or steroids).

The NOSE questionnaire consists of five questions concerning subjective assessment of the nasal obstruction within the past month. Each question can be answered usinga 5-point Likert scale from"0"(not a problem) up to"4"(severe problems with breathing). After addition of allitem values and multiplying the raw score with 5, severity of the patient's complaints can be scaled to range from 0 to 100. A score of 0 indicates no obstructivenasal problems and a score of 100 implies severe problems.

Day 45 after intervention
Nasal Obstruction
Time Frame: Day 90 after intervention

Nasal Obstruction, Sistemic medication and Endoscopy (NOSE) questionnaire. NOSE is a method of evaluating the clinical control of chronic rhinosinusitis and is based on the evaluation of three aspects: nasal obstruction, nasal endoscopy and the need for systemic medication (antibiotics or steroids).

The NOSE questionnaire consists of five questions concerning subjective assessment of the nasal obstruction within the past month. Each question can be answered usinga 5-point Likert scale from"0"(not a problem) up to"4"(severe problems with breathing). After addition of allitem values and multiplying the raw score with 5, severity of the patient's complaints can be scaled to range from 0 to 100. A score of 0 indicates no obstructivenasal problems and a score of 100 implies severe problems.

Day 90 after intervention
Nasal Endoscopic Evaluation
Time Frame: Day 45 after intervention
The nasal endoscopic evaluation will be performed under topical anesthesia, with a rigid endoscope (4mm, 0° and/or 45°; Karl Storz) and its classification will be based on the Lund - Kennedy criteria. For this evaluation, each nostril is examined separately and three possible characteristics may be present, they are: polyps, nasal mucosa edema and/or secretion. For each evaluated characteristic, a score from 0 to 2 is assigned. For the evaluation of polyps, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=restricted to the middle meatus; and, 2=extension to nasal cavity. For the evaluation of nasal mucosa edema, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=mild or moderate edema; and 2= polypoid degeneration. For the evaluation of secretion, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=hyaline secretion; and, 2=mucopurulent or thick secretion.
Day 45 after intervention
Nasal Endoscopic Evaluation
Time Frame: Day 90 after intervention
The nasal endoscopic evaluation will be performed under topical anesthesia, with a rigid endoscope (4mm, 0° and/or 45°; Karl Storz) and its classification will be based on the Lund - Kennedy criteria. For this evaluation, each nostril is examined separately and three possible characteristics may be present, they are: polyps, nasal mucosa edema and/or secretion. For each evaluated characteristic, a score from 0 to 2 is assigned. For the evaluation of polyps, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=restricted to the middle meatus; and, 2=extension to nasal cavity. For the evaluation of nasal mucosa edema, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=mild or moderate edema; and 2= polypoid degeneration. For the evaluation of secretion, the score is applied as follows: 0=absent; 1=hyaline secretion; and, 2=mucopurulent or thick secretion.
Day 90 after intervention
Sino Nasal Outcome Test
Time Frame: Day 45 after intervention
Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) The SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a modification of the SNOT-20, with 2 additional items on nasal obstruction and problems with smell and taste. The questionnaire assesses 22 items related to nasal symptoms that can impact the patient's personal and social life. Each item can get a score ranging from 0 (least possible problem) to 5 (greatest possible problem). Thus, this questionnaire has a final score that can range from 0 to 110 points. In this study, a significant clinical improvement will be considered when there is at least a variation of 11 points from one assessment to another.23 The validity and reliability of the SNOT-22 have already been previously tested in Portuguese.
Day 45 after intervention
Sino Nasal Outcome Test
Time Frame: Day 90 after intervention
Sino Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) The SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a modification of the SNOT-20, with 2 additional items on nasal obstruction and problems with smell and taste. The questionnaire assesses 22 items related to nasal symptoms that can impact the patient's personal and social life. Each item can get a score ranging from 0 (least possible problem) to 5 (greatest possible problem). Thus, this questionnaire has a final score that can range from 0 to 110 points. In this study, a significant clinical improvement will be considered when there is at least a variation of 11 points from one assessment to another.23 The validity and reliability of the SNOT-22 have already been previously tested in Portuguese.
Day 90 after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 15, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rhinosinusitis Chronic

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe