Neuropathic Pain and Operant Conditioning of Cutaneous Reflexes After SCI

October 8, 2025 updated by: Aiko Thompson, Medical University of South Carolina

Targeted Spinal Cord Plasticity for Alleviating SCI-related Neuropathic Pain

The purpose of the second part of the study is to examine the effect of reflex training in the leg to decrease neuropathic pain. For this, the researchers are recruiting 15 individuals with neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury to participate in the reflex training procedure. The study involves approximately 50 visits with a total study duration of about 6.5 months (3 months for baseline and training phases followed by 1 month and 3 month follow-up visits).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

As part of the larger study of the relationship between reflexes in the leg and the presence of neuropathic pain, the researchers are also recruiting 30 individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) total, 15 individuals with neuropathic pain due to SCI and 15 individuals without neuropathic pain. For this portion of the study, there are 2 visits. The first visit will examine cutaneous reflexes in the leg. During the second visit, the study team will assess sensation in the leg and administer questionnaires about pain, functioning, and quality of life. This portion of the study does not involve an intervention.

The study will then recruit 15 individuals who will participate in reflex training, as described in the brief summary.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Blair Dellenbach, MSOT
  • Phone Number: 843-792-6313
  • Email: stecb@musc.edu

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of South Carolina
        • Contact:
          • Blair Dellenbach, MSOT
          • Phone Number: 843-792-6313

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. neurologically stable (>1 year post SCI)
  2. medical clearance to participate
  3. ability to stand with or without an assistive device for at least 3 minutes at a time
  4. expectation that current medication will be maintained without change for at least 3 months (stable use of anti-spasticity medication is accepted)
  5. For participants with neuropathic pain, the area of neuropathic pain must include lower leg.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. motoneuron injury
  2. known cardiac condition
  3. medically unstable condition (incl. pregnancy)
  4. cognitive impairment
  5. uncontrolled peripheral neuropathy
  6. frequent use of electrical spinal stimulation (either transcutaneous or epidural) for pain treatment
  7. daily use of electrical stimulation to the leg
  8. complete lack of cutaneous sensation around foot.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Operant Conditioning of Cutaneous Reflexes
Each participant completes 6 baseline sessions and 30 conditioning sessions. In each of the 30 conditioning sessions, while the participant is standing nerves in the lower leg and ankle are stimulated to activate the reflex. The participant attempts to change the reflex activity based on visual feedback. In this way the cutaneous reflex (skin reflex) will be changed to decrease neuropathic pain resulting from spinal cord injury.
This is a training intervention in which people with a spinal cord injury are trained to change (increase or decrease) the activity of a certain spinal reflex. By changing this reflex, it is hypothesized that individuals can reduce pain due to spinal cord injury.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in minimum stimulation intensity required to barely detect the sensation (perceived threshold, perT)
Time Frame: change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol, at 1 month follow up and at 3 months follow up
This is measured by slowly increasing the nerve stimulation and recording the minimum intensity of stimulation at which the participant is barely able to perceive the sensation. A decrease in this threshold would demonstrate improved sensation.
change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol, at 1 month follow up and at 3 months follow up
Change in minimum intensity at which the sensation covers the maximum area of skin (radiating threshold, RT)
Time Frame: change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol, at 1 month follow up and at 3 months follow up
This is measured by slowly increasing the nerve stimulation and recording the minimum intensity of stimulation at which the sensation covers the maximum skin area). A decrease in this threshold indicates improved sensation.
change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol, at 1 month follow up and at 3 months follow up
Change in minimum intensity at which the stimulus become painful (pain threshold, PainT)
Time Frame: change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol, at 1 month follow up and at 3 months follow up
This is measured by slowly increasing the nerve stimulation and recording the intensity of stimulation at which the stimulation first becomes painful. An increase in this threshold indicates an increased tolerance to pain.
change from baseline to immediately after completing the training protocol, at 1 month follow up and at 3 months follow up
Change in pain as measured by the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
Time Frame: Completed at baseline, start of conditioning visits 13, 19, and 25, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up
The MPQ is a self-report questionnaire that assesses quality and intensity of pain. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 78 (severe pain).
Completed at baseline, start of conditioning visits 13, 19, and 25, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up
Change in neuropathic pain as measured by the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
Time Frame: Completed at baseline, start of conditioning visits 13, 19, and 25, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up
The NPSI is a self-report questionnaire that characterizes neuropathic pain symptom severity. Participants rate different symptoms of neuropathic pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (intense pain).
Completed at baseline, start of conditioning visits 13, 19, and 25, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in ability to perceive various types of sensations as indicated by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
Time Frame: Completed at baseline, start of conditioning visits 13, 19, and 25, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up
The QST is a battery of assessments that measure sensory thresholds for pain, touch, vibration, and hot and cold temperature sensations.
Completed at baseline, start of conditioning visits 13, 19, and 25, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up
Change in basic functional independence as measured by the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III)
Time Frame: Completed at baseline, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up
An increase in the the score on the SCIM III indicates increased basic functional independence. This is a self report questionnaire with 19 items in three sub-scales: (1) self-care (6 items, subscore 0-20); (2) respiration and sphincter management (4 items, subscore 0-40); and (3) mobility (9 items, subscore 0-40). The total score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicated increase independence.
Completed at baseline, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up
Change in functional independence as measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: Completed at baseline, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up
An increase in the score on the FIM indicates and increase in functional independence. This 18-item, clinician-reported scale assesses function in 6 areas including self-care, continence, mobility, transfers, communication, and cognition. Each of the 18 items is graded on a scale of 1-7 based on level of independence in that item (1 = total assistance required, 7 = complete independence).
Completed at baseline, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up
Change in quality of life as measured by Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life and Participation Questionnaire (SCI-QOL)
Time Frame: Completed at baseline, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up
An increase in score on the SCI-QOL indicates an increase in quality of life
Completed at baseline, after completing 30 conditioning sessions, 1 month follow up, and 3 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aiko Thompson, PhD, Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe