Comparing Hand-sewn (END-TO-END or Kono-S) to Stapled Anastomosis in Ileocolic Resection for Crohn's Disease (END2END)

December 12, 2023 updated by: Willem A. Bemelman, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Optimising Surgical Anastomosis in Ileocolic Resection for Crohn's Disease to Reduce Recurrent Disease: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Hand-sewn (END-TO-END or Kono-S) to Stapled Anastomosis (END-to-END Study)

The aim of this multicenter randomised controlled trial is to compare the handsewn (end-to-end and Kono-S) to the stapled side-to-side ileocolic anastomosis after ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with respect to 6 months endoscopic recurrence, functional outcome and health care consumption.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Within the surgical IBD society there has been a lot of attention to technical aspects of ileocolic resection aiming to reduce recurrent Crohn's disease after surgery. Despite optimal surgical and medical management, recurrent disease after surgery is common. Different types of anastomoses with respect to configuration and construction can be made after resection e.g., handsewn (end-to-end and Kono-S) and stapled (side-to-side). The various types of anastomoses might affect endoscopic recurrence and its assessment, the functional outcome, and costs. It is hypothesised that patients who had an end to end reconstruction will have less endoscopic recurrence (less overscoring, and less stases), a better function and consequently health care consumption than the stapled side to side anastomosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

165

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Flevoland
      • Almere, Flevoland, Netherlands, 1315 RA
        • Recruiting
        • Flevoziekenhuis
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jarmila van der Bilt, dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females aged >16 years
  • Ileocolic disease or disease of the neoterminal ileum with an indication for resection
  • Concurrent therapies with corticosteroids, 5-ASA drugs, thiopurines, MTX, antibiotics, and anti-TNF therapy are permitted.
  • All patients should have undergone a colonoscopy and a recent update of imaging (e.g. Ultrasound, MR enterography (or CT enterography if MR is contraindicated))- Ability to comply with protocol.
  • Competent and able to provide written informed consent.
  • Patient must have been discussed in the local MDT

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent.
  • Patients less than 16 years of age.
  • Clinically significant medical conditions within the six months before the operation : e.g. myocardial infarction, active angina, congestive heart failure or other conditions that would, in the opinion of the investigators, compromise the safety of the patient.
  • History of cancer < 5 years which might influence patients prognosis
  • Emergent operation.
  • Pregnant or breast feeding.
  • Inability to follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months for postoperative assessment, imaging and endoscopy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: stapled side-to-side anastomosis
Standard procedure for CD, ileocolic resection with side-to-side anastomosis is done according to local practice with a linear stapler either aniso- or isoperistaltic as advised by the ECCO guidelines
Standard procedure for CD
Active Comparator: Handsewn anastomosis: handsewn end-to-end or Kono-s anastomosis
  • Kono-S (anti-mesenteric functionel end-to-end handsewn) anastomosis is done according to the description by Kono
  • End-to-end handsewen anastomosis is fashioned either by enlarging the small bowel diameter by an antimesenteric incision to fit the large bowel lumen or by tailored resection of a part of the staple line of the cross stapled colon
handsewn end-to-end or Kono-s anastomosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative endoscopic recurrence at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
The postoperative endoscopic recurrence at 6 months following ileocolic resection defined as Rutgeerts > i2b by central reading
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Histologic and clinical recurrence rate at 6 months following ileocolic resection
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
6 months after surgery
Post-operative 30 days complications
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
30 days after surgery
Number of patients in need for restarting immunosuppressive medication within the first year postoperatively for endoscopic or clinical recurrence
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
  • Endoscopic recurrence defined as Rutgeerts > i2b
  • Clinical recurrence difned as recurrent CD-related symptoms
1 year after surgery
The 5 year reoperation rate for recurrence of disease at the anastomotic site.
Time Frame: 5 year
5 year
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
Quality of life measured with IBD questionnaire
1 year after surgery
Hospital costs
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
Hospital costs per patients in each group
1 year after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: W.A. Bemelman, Prof. dr., Amsterdam UMC, location AMC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Crohn Disease

Clinical Trials on stapled side-to-side anastomosis

Subscribe