Mepolizumab to CRSwNP Through 12 Months - Randomised to FESS and Non-FESS Within the First 2 Weeks

March 25, 2025 updated by: Vibeke Backer

Optimisation of Treatment in Patients with CRSwNP. an RCT of Mepolizumab and Surgical Treatment with FESS and Mepolizumab Versus Only Mepolizumab Over a 6- and 12-month Follow-up

This clinical trial will compare treatment in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and asthma. The patients will be randomized to treatment with the biologic drug, Mepolizumab, or the biologic drug Mepolizumab combined with Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS).

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of combined treatment with biologic treatment and surgery vs. biologic treatment only.

The hypothesis is that surgical removal of polyps and inflamed tissue from the nasal sinuses will increase the effect of the biologic treatment, leading to a lower disease burden after 6 months of treatment, compared with biologic drugs only. Furthermore, combined biologics and surgery will keep a lower disease burden and better general health after 12 months of treatment than biologics alone.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years old at the time of signed informed consent (no upper limit)
  • Patients who are referred to the outpatient clinic for the following reasons:

    • Doctor's diagnosis of CRS
  • NPS ≥ 2+2 out of a score of 8 (max)
  • Severity measured as an SNOT22 score > 35
  • One FESS in general anaesthesia performed prior to inclusion (no time limitations)
  • No course of systemic steroids within the last 3 months, whereas a daily low dose is allowed
  • Possible doctor's diagnosis of asthma
  • Type 2 inflammation

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients who, because of language barriers, are not able to understand written information and, thus, are not able to answer questionnaires
  • Patients who currently receive biologics for any other disease
  • Patients who have previously or currently received biologics for CRS or asthma
  • Patients who are not able to give informed consent (i.e., patients who are permanently incapable)
  • Patients who meet ≥1 of the following:

    • Malignant lung disease
    • Cardiac disease of clinical importance
    • Current pregnancy and breastfeeding, as well as planning to be pregnant in the near future
    • Unwillingness to have FESS performed
  • Patients needing FESS or systemic steroids (OCS) during the study period will be excluded after an unscheduled visit (last observation carried forward (LOCF))
  • Patients who are not eligible because of the investigator's judgement

The effect of the treatment will be evaluated with objective procedures and questionnaires related to CRSwNP and asthma after 3, 6 and 12 months.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

58

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years old at the time of signed informed consent (no upper limit)
  • Patients who are referred to the outpatient clinic for the following reasons:

    • Doctor's diagnosis of CRS
  • NPS ≥ 2+2 out of a score of 8 (max)
  • Severity measured as an SNOT22 score > 35
  • One FESS surgery in general anaesthesia performed prior to inclusion (no time limitations)
  • No course of systemic steroids within the last 3 months, whereas a daily low dose is allowed
  • Possible doctor's diagnosis of asthma
  • Type 2 inflammation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who, because of language barriers, are not able to understand written information and, thus, are not able to answer questionnaires
  • Patients who currently receive biologics for any other disease
  • Patients who have previously or currently received biologics for CRS or asthma
  • Patients who are not able to give informed consent (i.e., patients who are permanently incapable)
  • Patients who meet ≥1 of the following:

    • Malignant lung disease
    • Cardiac disease of clinical importance
    • Current pregnancy and breastfeeding, as well as planning to be pregnant in the near future
    • Unwillingness to have FESS performed
  • Patients needing FESS or systemic steroids (OCS) during the study period will be excluded after an unscheduled visit (last observation carried forward (LOCF))
  • Patients who are not eligible because of the investigator's judgement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group - FESS
Biologic treatment with Mepolizumab and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS).
All patients in both the intervention group and the control group will be treated with Mepolizumab injections every month.
The Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery will be performed 2 weeks after the first injection of Mepolizumab in the intervention group.
Active Comparator: Control group - No-FESS
Biologic treatment with Mepolizumab
All patients in both the intervention group and the control group will be treated with Mepolizumab injections every month.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOTT22) score
Time Frame: 6 months
The success rate indicated by a significant change in health-related quality of life related to nasal symptoms measured with the questionnaire SNOT22. The outcomes to be evaluated are the differences in success rates between the two treatment arms Minimum score = 0 and maximum score = 110 with high scores indicating a large rhinosinusitis-related health burden.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months follow up
The NPS scale ranges from 0 (no polyp) to 4 (large polyps) for each nostril. The total score ranging from 0-8.
3 and 6 months follow up
Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months follow up
Change in ACQ-score. Minimum score = 0 and maximum score = 6 with high scores indicating a large asthma-related health burden.
3, 6, and 12 months follow up
Change in Forced Expired Volume in the first second (FEV1)
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months follow up
Change in Forced Expired Volume in the first second (FEV1). The value is corrected for age, sex, height and weight.
6 and 12 months follow up
Change in nitric oxide in exhaled air
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months follow up
Change in nitric oxide in exhaled air examined with Exhaled Nitric Oxide Test (FeNO). A value between 0-25 is normal. A value >25 indicates inflammation in the airways.
6 and 12 months follow up
Change in middle ear pressure
Time Frame: 12 months
Change in middle ear pressure examined with a tympanometry. A =normal, B= flat curve, fluid or perfusion, C1= negative pressure down to -150 dPa, C2 = negative pressure below -150 dPA.
12 months
Change in olfactory function
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months follow up

Change in olfactory function measured with Sniffin' Sticks Identification Test 16.

Minimum score = 0. Maximum score = 16. A score between 0-8 indicates anosmia, a score between 8-11 indicates hyposmia, and a score >11 indicates normosmia.

6 and 12 months follow up
Change in visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months follow up
Change in VAS related to nasal symptoms. Minimum score = 0 and maximum score = 10. High score indicates worse nasal symptoms
3, 6, and 12 months follow up
Change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) score
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months follow up
FOSQ-10 consists of 10 questions rated on a scale of 1 to 4 (1=extreme difficulty and 4=no difficulty).
3, 6, and 12 months follow up
Change in Vo2max/kg(Cardiopulmonary exercise test )
Time Frame: 6 and 12 motnhs folow-up
Highest oxygen consumption measured on a stationary ergometer bike divided by body weight. MCID: 1 ml/min/kg
6 and 12 motnhs folow-up
Change in Daily step count
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months follow up
Measured as an average daily step count over 7 days using a smartphone
6 and 12 months follow up
Change in Activity level(questionnaire)
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months follow up
Patient's self-reported amount of exercise, measured using a questionnaire (customised AQUA)
6 and 12 months follow up
Change in forced vital capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months follow up
The value is corrected for age, sex, height and weight.
3, 6, and 12 months follow up
Change in ratio between FEV1/FVC
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months follow up
FEV1 divided by FVC. A ratio <0.70 is considered as obstructive.
3, 6, and 12 months follow up
Change in Epworth Sleepiness score (ESS)
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months follow up
ESS consists of 8 questions rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (3=extreme difficulty and 0=no difficulty)
3, 6, and 12 months follow up
Change in AHI/ODI
Time Frame: 6, and 12 months follow up
Measurement of objective sleep parameters (Apnea hypopnea index and Oxygen desaturation index)
6, and 12 months follow up
Change in Blood Eosinophilic cell count
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months follow up.
Blood Eosinophilic cell count from full blood cell count (109/mL).
3, 6, and 12 months follow up.
Change in Polyp Eosinophilic cell count
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months follow up.
Tissue eosinophilia, classified into four categories: none (0), mild (<10 hpf), moderate (10-100 hpf), and severe (>100 hpf).
6 and 12 months follow up.
Change in Small airway dysfunction
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months follow up.
Measured by the average flow from the point at which 25 percent of the FVC has been exhaled to the point at which 75 percent of the FVC has been exhaled(MFEF75/25) and Impulse oscillometry: Difference in R5Hz and R20Hz , AX and X5Hz.
6 and 12 months follow up.
Change in Bronchial hyperresponsiveness
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months follow up
Assessed through methacholine and mannitol challenge tests. Methacholine inhalation ranged from 0 to 1440 µg, with a positive test defined as a ≥20% decrease in FEV1 (PD20). Mannitol inhalation ranged from 0 to 635 mg, with a positive test defined as a ≥15% decrease in FEV1 (PD15)
6 and 12 months follow up
Change in eosinophilic cell count in sputum
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months follow up
Sputum induced through the inhalation of hypertonic saline at increasing concentrations (3%, 4%, and 5%). Percentual amount of Eosinophilic cells.
6 and 12 months follow up
Change in NasalNO
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months follow up
A value greater then 255-300 is considered normal, whereas values less than 77 nl/min is abnormal.
6 and 12 months follow up
Change in visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months follow up
Change in VAS related to asthma symptoms. Minimum score = 0 and maximum score = 100. High score indicates worse Asthma symptoms
3, 6, and 12 months follow up
Change in visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Change in VAS related to Smell. Minimum score = 0 and maximum score = 100. High score indicates worse Hyposmia Symptoms.
3, 6 and 12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Vibeke B Backer, Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Rigshospitalet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Mepolizumab Injection

Subscribe