Assessment of a Robotic Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation (Exo4UL)

November 7, 2022 updated by: Heba Lakany, University of Liverpool

EXO4UL- Assessment of a Robotic Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation of Spinal Cord Injured Patients

Rehabilitation robotics has the potential to facilitate rehabilitation at home and empower people with spinal injuries to self-manage increasing their independence and improving their quality of life.

The objective of this study is to assess for the first time in the NHS the efficacy of a commercial robotic orthosis for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with spinal cord injury. The device is produced by Myomo (myomo.com) which is an American company. We will be assessing the wearable robotic orthosis also known as robotic exoskeleton in two different neuro-rehabilitation centres: National Spinal injuries Unit in Glasgow (Scotland) and The Robert Jones and Agnus Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital in Oswestry (England). The study will involve nine spinal cord injured tetraplegic inpatients in total.

Patients will follow a twelve-week rehabilitation programme with three to four sessions per week in addition to their usual care and rehabilitation. Each session lasts for approximately 45 minutes. Participants arm function, range of motion, spasticity level will be measured before, half-way and at the end of the programme to assess change in these and other parameters. Training will focus on the dominant arm of the patient and compared to the other arm at every assessment stage.

We shall evaluate therapists' and patients' satisfaction with the commercial device in addition to assessing various clinical measures to evaluate the efficacy of using the robotic orthosis in rehabilitation and recovery of arm function.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

9

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18+ years.
  • The levels of C5 C6 Asia C/D would provide individuals with elbow and hand impairment and potentially functional shoulder movements. C7, C8 individuals could also benefit from the hand component of the device.
  • Some gross shoulder movement at start of the trial to enable changes at the elbow/hand, to have the greatest potential for functional change.
  • Preservation of hand sensation as base for motor restoration.
  • Some sitting balance would give the best opportunity for the arm to be released for functional upper limb activity.
  • EMG (muscle activity) evidence of active finger flexion, extension and elbow flexion extension Grade 1-2.
  • Minimal or No community functional use of upper limb at start of trial.
  • Spasticity MAS 1-3/5.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Device Intervention
The intervention group who will be undergoing rehabilitation using the robotic exoskeleton in addition to the assigned traditional rehabilitation programme on their dominant arm only.
The robotic rehabilitation programme using the MARK from Myomo (myomo.com) for the intervention group will last for 12 weeks with up to four sessions of rehabilitation per week, i.e. total of 48 sessions. Spinal cord injured inpatients in the study will have this intervention on their dominant arm in addition to the traditional rehabilitation programme assigned and standard care.
Other Names:
  • Robotic Rehabilitation
No Intervention: Control
the matched control group will be the same subjects undergoing traditional rehabilitation only on their non-dominant arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III)
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks
assesses performance in activities of daily living and mobility for individuals with spinal cord injury
Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks
Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III)
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) at 12 weeks
assesses performance in activities of daily living and mobility for individuals with spinal cord injury
Change from baseline (week 1) at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation and Prehension (GRASSP).
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
The GRASSP is a clinical impairment measure for the upper limb for use after tetraplegia. The measure includes three domains which are important in describing hand function.
Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
The modified Ashworth scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Ashworth scale is the most universally accepted clinical spasticity assessment tool used to measure the increase of muscle tone.
Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Range of Motion
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
to assess the capability of a joint to go through its complete spectrum of movements
Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
COPM assesses the patient's perceived occupational performance in the areas of selfcare, productivity, and leisure
Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0)
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
The QUEST 2.0 evaluates a patient's satisfaction with various assistive technologies.
Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heba Lakany, PhD, University of Liverpool
  • Study Director: Simon J Pickard, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on Experimental: Device Intervention

3
Subscribe