Cemented vs. Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

July 20, 2023 updated by: Kevin B. Fricka, MD, Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute

A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Fixed Bearing Unicondylar Medial Knee Replacement

The primary study objective is to evaluate a cementless partial knee system that has a modular 3-D printed porous metal tibial component and a cemented partial knee system. The hypothesis is that at minimum 2-year follow-up, fixed bearing medial partial knee replacements using cementless and cemented fixation will demonstrate no differences in clinical outcome.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, unblinded clinical trial of 100 patients will be enrolled by invitation of the principal investigator. Inclusion criteria include patients 18-85 years old, patients receiving a medial fixed bearing partial knee replacement and patients deemed suitable for both cemented and cementless fixation after review of the preoperative radiographs. Minimum two-year outcome will be analyzed, and long-term follow-up will continue to 5 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Alexandria, Virginia, United States, 22307
        • Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age18-85 years old
  • medial fixed bearing partial knee replacement
  • bone suitable for both cemented and cementless fixation after review of the preoperative radiographs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speakers
  • current smokers
  • grossly porotic bone
  • advanced other compartment arthritis at the time of surgery necessitating a total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
  • previous high tibial osteotomy with prior hardware
  • patients who are randomized but are deemed unsuitable to receive the assigned implant by the surgeon due to bone quality or bone cuts

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cementless
Cementless fixation partial knee replacement
Three dimensional printed porous metal, a biomaterial with morphological and mechanical properties that resemble those of native trabecular bone, is now being used for fixation of the tibial component in unicondylar knee arthroplasty. This can reliably achieve osseointegration into the tibia and could lead to a lower risk of aseptic loosening which is the leading cause of revision in partial knee replacements.
Active Comparator: Cemented
Cemented fixation partial knee replacement
Three dimensional printed porous metal, a biomaterial with morphological and mechanical properties that resemble those of native trabecular bone, is now being used for fixation of the tibial component in unicondylar knee arthroplasty. This can reliably achieve osseointegration into the tibia and could lead to a lower risk of aseptic loosening which is the leading cause of revision in partial knee replacements.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee Society Score
Time Frame: 2 years postoperative
Clinical score for knee status and function. (0-100 scale, with 0 being the worst score and 100 being the best score.)
2 years postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Robert Hopper, Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

July 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRJ123

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Partial Knee Replacement

Clinical Trials on Cementless fixation

Subscribe