14022 ATTUNE Cementless RP Clinical Performance Evaluation

April 23, 2024 updated by: DePuy Orthopaedics

Multi-Center Clinical Evaluation of the ATTUNE Cementless Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty

The primary objective of this study is to examine the change from pre-operative baseline to two year postoperative functional performance improvement for the ATTUNE primary, cementless TKA RP system as measured with the KOOS questionnaire (KOOS-ADL sub-score). This will be carried out for two configurations: cruciate retaining rotating platform (ATTUNE Cementless CR RP) and posterior stabilized rotating platform (ATTUNE Cementless PS RP).

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The secondary objectives of this study are:

  • Evaluate change from preoperative baseline in post-operative outcomes using additional patient reported measures at 2 years: PKIP (overall and sub-scores), KOOS (overall and sub-scores), AKS and EQ-5D-3L.
  • Evaluate change from preoperative baseline in pain and satisfaction over time as measured using a modified VAS Pain Score (discrete numbers rather than a continual scale) at 2yr.
  • Evaluate type and frequency of Adverse Events
  • Evaluate survivorship of the ATTUNE Primary Cementless TKA system for the CR RP and PS RP configurations using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 2yr and 5yrs.
  • Evaluate primary, cementless ATTUNE TKA fixation through zonal radiographic analysis of the bone-implant interface at 6wk, 6mo, 1yr, and 2yr after surgery.
  • Evaluate any changes in anatomic tibiofemoral, femoral component and tibial component alignment at 2 years compared to the first postoperative radiographs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

540

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Upper Austria
      • Ried im Innkreis, Upper Austria, Austria, 4910
        • Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Ried im Innkreis
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
        • Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary
      • Salouel, France, 80480
        • Sevice de Chirurgie Orthoedique et Traumatologique
    • Cedex
      • Brest, Cedex, France, 29285
        • CHU de la Cavale Blanche
      • Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, 82467
        • Klinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen GmbH
      • Cork, Ireland, T12 X23H
        • South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital
    • Noord-Brabant
      • Helmond, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands, 5707 HA
        • Elkerliek Ziekenhuis
      • Christchurch, New Zealand, 8083
        • University of Otago
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG5 1PB
        • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    • Lancashire
      • Wigan, Lancashire, United Kingdom, WN6 9EP
        • Wrightington Hospital
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80210
        • Colorado Joint Replacement
    • Florida
      • DeLand, Florida, United States, 32720
        • Florida Research Associates
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
      • New London, New Hampshire, United States, 03257
        • New London Hospital
    • New Jersey
      • Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey, United States, 08234
        • Rothman Institute
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11203
        • SUNY downstate Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • UNC Chapel Hill
    • Tennessee
      • Kingsport, Tennessee, United States, 37660
        • Associated Orthopaedics of Kingsport
    • Texas
      • Lubbock, Texas, United States, 49416
        • Texas Tech University Heath Science Center
    • Virginia
      • Newport News, Virginia, United States, 23606
        • Hampton Roads Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is male or female and between the ages of 22 and 80 years at the time of surgery, inclusive.
  • Subject was diagnosed with NIDJD.
  • Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, is a suitable candidate for cementless primary TKA using the devices described in this CIP with either resurfaced or non-resurfaced patellae.
  • Subject that is willing to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and authorize the transfer of his/her information to the Sponsor
  • Subject is currently not bedridden
  • Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, is able to understand this clinical investigation and is willing and able to perform all study procedures and follow-up visits and co-operate with investigational procedures.
  • Subject is able to read, and comprehend the Informed Consent Document as well as complete the required PROs in either English or one of the available translations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The Subject is a woman who is pregnant or lactating.
  • Contralateral knee has already been enrolled in this study .
  • Subject had a contralateral amputation.
  • Previous partial knee replacement (unicompartmental, bicompartmental or patellofemoral joint replacement), patellectomy, high tibial osteotomy or primary TKA in affected knee.
  • Subject is currently diagnosed with radicular pain from the spine that radiates into the limb to receive TKA.
  • Subject has participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product (drug or device) in the last three (3) months.
  • Subject is currently involved in any personal injury litigation, medical-legal or worker's compensation claims.
  • Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, is a drug or alcohol abuser (in the last 5 years) or has a psychological disorder that could affect their ability to complete patient reported questionnaires or be compliant with follow-up requirements.
  • Subject was diagnosed and is taking prescription medications to treat a muscular disorder that limits mobility due to severe stiffness and pain such as fibromyalgia or polymyalgia.
  • Subject has a significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorder(s) or disease that may adversely affect gait or weight bearing (e.g., muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, Charcot disease).
  • Subject is suffering from inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.).
  • Subject has a medical condition with less than five (5) years life expectancy.
  • Uncontrolled gout

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ATTUNE Cementless RP TKA
Subjects will receive a cementless, rotating platform total knee arthroplasty
Patients will undergo a primary total knee replacement using one of the two configurations of the ATTUNE Cementless knee (CR RP or PS RP)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported Outcome: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (KOOS ADL)
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient self-administered questionnaire that consists of 42 questions and include the WOMAC Osteoarthritis index. The KOOS consists of 5 subscales: pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL), sport and recreational function and knee related quality of life. Each question has 5 Likert-like response options. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported Outcome: Pre-surgical/Post-surgical Patient's Knee Implant Performance (PKIP)
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
The Pre Surgical and/or Post-surgical Patient's Knee Implant Performance (PKIP) questionnaire is a patient self-administered questionnaire that consists of 25 questions relating to the patient's awareness of their knee. Questions include the patient's self-confidence about the current status of their knee performance, stability, and overall satisfaction. Each question has a 5, 6 or 10 Likert- like response option.
Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
Patient-reported Outcome: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient self-administered questionnaire that consists of 42 questions and include the WOMAC Osteoarthritis index. The KOOS consists of 5 subscales: pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL), sport and recreational function and knee related quality of life. Each question has 5 Likert-like response options. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
Combination of Patient-reported and Clinical-reported Outcome: Knee Society 2011
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
The Knee Society Score is a self-administered questionnaire. The subject completes questions regarding: Symptoms (3 questions), Patient Satisfaction (5 questions), Patient Expectations (3 questions), Functional Activities (5 questions), Standard Activities (6 questions), Advanced Activities (5 questions), and Discretionary Knee Activities ( 4 questions). The surgeon completes questions regarding objective knee indicators. Likert responses are used, typically with five response options.
Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
Patient Reported Outcome: EuroQol 5D 3L questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L)
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
EuroQol 5D 3L questionnaire is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that is designed for completion by the subject.
Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
Modified VAS Pain Score: Pain and Satisfaction
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
VAS Pain Score is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of pain and satisfaction that is designed for completion by the subject. This modified version has scores that are discrete numbers rather than a continual scale
Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
Type and Frequency of Adverse Events (AEs) for all enrolled subjects
Time Frame: Pre-op (-90 to -1 days before surgery), 6 weeks (1-90 days after surgery), 6 months (91-303 days after surgery), minimum 1 year (304-669 days after surgery), minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery), minimum 5 years (1764-2190 days after surgery)
All Serious AEs must be reported to Sponsor. All device-related or procedure-related adverse events must be reported to Sponsor.
Pre-op (-90 to -1 days before surgery), 6 weeks (1-90 days after surgery), 6 months (91-303 days after surgery), minimum 1 year (304-669 days after surgery), minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery), minimum 5 years (1764-2190 days after surgery)
Survivorship
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis will be used to calculate the survivorship of all 2 configurations (CR RP, PS RP)
Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
Survivorship
Time Frame: Minimum 5 years (1764-2190 days after surgery)
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis will be used to calculate the survivorship of all 2 configurations (CR RP, PS RP)
Minimum 5 years (1764-2190 days after surgery)
Implant fixation: Radiographic assessment of bone-implant interface performance
Time Frame: 6 weeks (1-90 days after surgery)
Radiographic success is defined as: absence of progressive radiolucent lines greater than or equal to 2mm in any one zone; absence of lytic lesions in any zone; absence of individual component position change >3degrees in any plane.
6 weeks (1-90 days after surgery)
Implant fixation: Radiographic assessment of bone-implant interface performance
Time Frame: 6 months (91-303 days after surgery)
Radiographic success is defined as: absence of progressive radiolucent lines greater than or equal to 2mm in any one zone; absence of lytic lesions in any zone; absence of individual component position change >3degrees in any plane.
6 months (91-303 days after surgery)
Implant fixation: Radiographic assessment of bone-implant interface performance
Time Frame: Minimum 1 year (304-669 days after surgery).
Radiographic success is defined as: absence of progressive radiolucent lines greater than or equal to 2mm in any one zone; absence of lytic lesions in any zone; absence of individual component position change >3degrees in any plane.
Minimum 1 year (304-669 days after surgery).
Implant fixation: Radiographic assessment of bone-implant interface performance
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
Radiographic success is defined as: absence of progressive radiolucent lines greater than or equal to 2mm in any one zone; absence of lytic lesions in any zone; absence of individual component position change >3degrees in any plane.
Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
Evaluate changes in femoral component and tibial component alignment
Time Frame: Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)
Radiographs will be reviewed by an independent radiographic reviewer (IRR) in order to minimize bias of radiographic outcomes. Data from the IRR radiographic evaluations will be used to evaluate femoral and tibial component alignment over time.
Minimum 2 years (670-1033 days after surgery)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sukhjeet Kaur, Sponsor GmbH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

July 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty

3
Subscribe