- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05629676
Virtual Reality Intervention for Patients Undergoing BMT
Randomized Controlled Trial of a Virtual Reality Psychosocial Intervention to Promote Coping for Patients Undergoing Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT-VR)
The goal of this research study is to test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of using a virtual reality (VR) psychosocial intervention for improving quality of life and psychological distress in patients hospitalized for bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Participants will be randomly assigned into one of the study groups: the virtual reality psychosocial intervention (BMT-VR) + usual care versus usual care alone.
The BMT-VR intervention has several components:
- Psychoeducation to enhance preparedness, manage expectations, and mobilize social supports.
- Psychosocial skill building to promote effective coping and facilitate acceptance while living with uncertainty of treatment outcomes.
- Self-care to promote effective coping and enhance patient's sense of control as they transition from inpatient to outpatient care
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients undergoing BMT endure substantial physical and psychological symptoms during a prolonged hospitalization with significant risk of complications, which negatively impact their overall quality of life. There is a critical need to develop innovative supportive care interventions to improve the quality of life and care of patients undergoing BMT.
This is a single-center, randomized, controlled research study to test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of BMT-VR for improving quality of life and reducing psychological stress for patients undergoing BMT. BMT-VR is a self-administered virtual reality psychosocial intervention to address the supportive care needs of patients undergoing BMT.
Participants will be recruited and randomized in 1:1 fashion to BMT-VR + usual care versus usual care alone, stratified by transplant type (autologous vs. allogenic BMT)
Participants randomly assigned to BMT-VR group will receive usual transplant care by their BMT team and will also be given a virtual reality headset to engage with BMT-VR during their BMT hospitalization. Participants will complete six sections focused on educating them about BMT and helping them manage the physical and emotional symptoms with the BMT process.
Participants randomly assigned to the usual care group will receive usual transplant care by their BMT team and will not be given access to the BMT-VR intervention.
In both groups, participants are asked to complete questionnaires (in-person, over the computer or telephone, or by mail) at baseline, 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after enrolling in the study.
It is expected about 80 participants will take part in this study.
Rocket VR Health, Inc. is supporting this research study by providing funding.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients (age > 18 years) with hematologic malignancy admitted for autologous or allogeneic BMT
- Ability to comprehend, read, and respond to questions in English as BMT-VR is only available in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing BMT for benign hematologic conditions
- Patients undergoing outpatient BMT
- Patients with acute or unstable psychiatric or cognitive conditions which the treating clinicians believes prohibits informed consent or compliance with study procedures
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: BMT-VR Group
|
BMT-VR is a novel psychosocial intervention that addresses the supportive care needs of patients undergoing BMT.
BMT-VR includes six sections focused on: 1) psychoeducation to help patients increase their awareness to stress and challenges that may accompany the BMT journey; 2) supportive psychotherapy strategies to help patients adjust to the intense BMT hospitalization; 3) psychosocial skill building to promote mindfulness, acceptance and gratitude while living with uncertainty; 4) psychoeducation to manage expectations and enhance preparedness for extended hospitalization; 5) psychosocial skill-building to promote effective coping; and 6) an overview of psychosocial skills grounded in cognitive behavior therapy, mindfulness, and positive psychology
|
|
No Intervention: Usual care
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of BMT-VR based on enrollment and intervention use rates
Time Frame: Baseline to week-24
|
The intervention will be deemed feasible if 60% of eligible patients are enrolled and of those enrolled and randomized to BMT-VR, 60% complete at least 60% of the intervention modules
|
Baseline to week-24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life (QOL) (FACT-BMT)
Time Frame: Baseline to week-24
|
Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) scale, which is 44-item QOL measure that assesses physical, social, emotional, and functional wellbeing, as well as bone marrow transplant-specific symptoms.
Score range 0-164, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
|
Baseline to week-24
|
|
Anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: Up to week-24
|
Assessed by the self-reported Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which is a 14-item measure with subscales to evaluate symptoms of anxiety and depression.
The HADS consists of two subscales assessing depression and anxiety symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 (no distress) to 21 (maximum distress)
|
Up to week-24
|
|
Depression symptoms
Time Frame: Up to week-24
|
Assessed through the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), which is a 9-item measure that assesses major depression symptoms.
The HADS consists of two subscales assessing depression and anxiety symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 (no distress) to 21 (maximum distress)
|
Up to week-24
|
|
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Time Frame: Up to week-24
|
Assessed through the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version, which is a 17-item PTSD Checklist that evaluates severity of PTSD symptoms.
Scores range from 17-85 with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms
|
Up to week-24
|
|
Symptom Burden
Time Frame: Up to week-4
|
Assessed through the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-R), which is a 10-item measure to assess symptoms relevant to patients undergoing BMT.
The ESAS-R score range 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden
|
Up to week-4
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Coping
Time Frame: Up to week-24
|
Assessed through the Measure of Current Status (MOCS), which measures perceived coping skills.
Score ranges from 0-52 with higher scores indicating higher coping skills
|
Up to week-24
|
|
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Up to week-24
|
assessed through the Cancer Self-Efficacy Scale-Transplant (CASE-t).
The scale ranges from 0 to 170 with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy
|
Up to week-24
|
|
Positive affect
Time Frame: Up to week-24
|
Assessed via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), a 10-item measure with a score range of 10-50, with higher scores indicating more positive affect
|
Up to week-24
|
|
Gratitude
Time Frame: Up to week-24
|
Assessed via the Gratitude questionnaire, a 6-item measure, with score range 6-42, with higher scores indicating more gratitude
|
Up to week-24
|
|
Usability of BMT-VR (only those randomized to BMT-VR)
Time Frame: Week-4
|
Assessed via the System Usability Scale, which ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better usability
|
Week-4
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Areej El-Jawahri, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 22-486
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.