Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Findings in TBM/Spinal Tubercular Arachnoiditis and Correlation With Outcomes

November 23, 2022 updated by: Arunmozhimaran Elavarasi, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Findings in Tubercular Meningitis/Spinal Tubercular Arachnoiditis and Correlation With Outcomes in Patients With Tubercular Meningitis, Spinal Tubercular Arachnoiditis

The goal of this Diagnostic accuracy study is

  • To study sensitivity and specificity of sulcal tuberculomas in the diagnosis of tubercular meningitis and
  • To study the correlation of imaging findings in tubercular meningitis and spinal tubercular arachnoiditis with clinical outcomes after completion of therapy
  • Secondary objectives
  • To study the proportion of patients having clinical or imaging features of spinal tubercular arachnoiditis
  • To study the factors determining outcomes in patients with spinal tubercular arachnoiditis
  • To study the treatment trends in patients with spinal tubercular arachnoiditis

The investigators will include [study Population] Patients with chronic meningitis as per criteria listed below

  • Chronic meningitis : Case definition
  • Headache with or without fever, nuchal stiffness and systemic symptoms AND
  • CSF suggestive of meningitis Pleocytosis (>20 cells per μL) with lymphocyte predominance (>50%) OR Protein concentration greater than age-specific normal value; especially >1•0 g/L OR Glucose concentration less than 60% of concentration in blood OR MRI suggestive of meningeal enhancement on contrast enhanced T1 sequences AND
  • Deemed by the treating physician that the syndrome is consistent with chronic meningitis
  • Patients who are positive for antibodies to HIV and pregnant females will also be included.
  • Willing to undergo periodic assessment clinically and with MRI as per clinical condition demands.

The sensitivity and specificity of the finding of sulcal tuberculomas will be compared to the reference standard diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of TB meningitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Methodology of the study Study design:Ambispective cohort study; Observational study; Diagnostic accuracy study

Sample size: All consecutive patients in the database will be included in the retrospective study and all new patients registered in the neurology OPD and admitted in the Neurology or General Medicine or Geriatric medicine or Medical oncology wards will be included in the prospective arm

Expecting a sensitivity of 70% of sulcal tuberculomas in tubercular meningitis with a range of 60 to 80, the investigators expect (4*70*30) /10*10=84 patients Expecting sulcal tuberculomas to have a specificity of 80%, with a range of 70 to 90%, the investigators expect (4*80*20)/10*10=64 patients Expecting a 70% prevalence of tubercular meningitis amongst patients with chronic meningitis, sample size of atleast 120 patients (70% of 120=84).

Subjects:

  • Study Population: Patients with chronic meningitis as per criteria described
  • Inclusion criteria

    • Patients attending Neurology OPD or are admitted in General Medicine or Geriatric medicine or Medical oncology wards with chronic meningitis diagnosed on the basis of composite clinical criteria, imaging criteria as well as natural history of the illness
    • Atleast 14 years of age of all sexes
    • Chronic meningitis : Case definition above
    • Willing to undergo periodic assessment clinically and with MRI as per clinical condition demands.
  • Diagnostic criteria for Tuberculous meningitis ▪ Described in the diagnostic test section ahead
  • Diagnostic criteria for clinical spinal tubercular arachnoiditis

    ▪ Developed paraparesis/quadriparesis/sphincter dysfunction due to spinal radiculomyelitis OR areflexia OR hyperreflexia with no obvious brain parenchymal lesions (suggestive of spinal meningitis-myelitis) or vision loss due to optico-chiasmatic arachnoiditis with imaging evidence of arachnoiditis

  • Sample Size: All consecutive patients presenting with chronic meningitis as described above will be included

Exclusion criteria for prospective arm

● Not willing to provide consent

Conduct of the study

  • Study protocol

    • Consent: Participants or their legally authorized representatives will be explained about the study and informed written consent will be taken in the language they understand for the prospective study
    • Participants will undergo magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine with contrast using the standardized protocol for chronic meningitis used at AIIMS as the standard of care in the workup of chronic meningitis.
    • The final diagnosis of Tubercular meningitis will be made based on the criteria described above and the sensitivity and specificity of sulcal tuberculomas in the diagnosis of TBM will be determined
    • Other imaging findings of spinal tubercular arachnoiditis will be collected on a structured proforma by the radiologist who will be blinded to the clinical information on the presence or absence of clinical features.
    • Participants will follow treatment for tuberculosis as per the treating physician's discretion in terms of anti-tubercular therapy, anti-seizure medication therapy, duration and dose of corticosteroids and steroid sparing agents.
    • Data collection and analysis will be done as per protocol Follow up and outcomes assessed > Participants of the prospective arm will be carefully assessed with detailed history, clinical examination, necessary laboratory investigations and imaging > Detailed history and clinical and neurologic examination, lab parameters and imaging data will be documented into a database as per protocol > Participants will follow treatment for his/her primary condition as per the treating physician's discretion > Outcomes will be assessed at 3 months, 6 months and at end of therapy > The outcome parameters of interest will be modified Rankin scale, visual acuity at 3 months and end of therapy.

Diagnostic accuracy of imaging parameters in the diagnosis of tubercular meningitis will be assessed by sensitivity and specificity.

The investigators aim to do a descriptive study of the clinical, laboratory and imaging parameters of patients tubercular meningitis and spinal tubercular arachnoiditis and compare with patients with other forms of chronic meningitis.

The treatment strategy, usage of anti-tubercular therapy, usage of corticosteroids, steroid sparing therapy, and surgical interventions offered will be studied.

Outcomes will be assessed and compared those who have sulcal tuberculumas and those who don't. The patients with and without spinal arachnoiditis on imaging also will be compared, and their outcomes assessed. Factors affecting outcomes will be studied and exploratory analysis will be done. Statistical analysis will be performed on the available information. Qualitative data will be presented as the number and the percentage of patients in each treatment group. Quantitative data will be presented as mean and standard deviation, range, median and inter-quartile range by treatment group. The absence of imbalance between groups will be checked on baseline variables. Comparisons of qualitative variables between groups will be performed by a Fisher exact test; comparison of quantitative data will be performed by a t test or a comparison of median when they will not follow a Normal distribution. All statistical tests will be performed with the use of a two-sided type I error rate of 5%.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110029
        • Recruiting
        • All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

▪ Chronic meningitis : Case definition

  • Headache with or without fever, nuchal stiffness and systemic symptoms AND
  • CSF suggestive of meningitis Pleocytosis (>20 cells per μL) with lymphocyte predominance (>50%) OR Protein concentration less greater than age-specific normal value; especially >1•0 g/L OR Glucose concentration than 60% of concentration in blood OR MRI suggestive of meningeal enhancement on contrast enhanced T1 sequences AND
  • Deemed by the treating physician that the syndrome is consistent with chronic meningitis

Description

  • Patients attending Neurology OPD or are admitted in General Medicine or Geriatric medicine or Medical oncologywards with chronic meningitis diagnosed on the basis of composite clinical criteria, imaging criteria as well as natural history of the illness
  • Atleast 14 years of age of all sexes Willing to undergo periodic assessment clinically and with MRI as per clinical condition demands.

Exclusion Criteria:

Not willing to provide consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Chronic Meningitis
  • Chronic meningitis : Case definition

    • Headache with or without fever, nuchal stiffness and systemic symptoms AND
    • CSF suggestive of meningitis Pleocytosis (>20 cells per μL) with lymphocyte predominance (>50%) OR Protein concentration greater than age-specific normal value; especially >1•0 g/L OR Glucose concentration less than 60% of concentration in blood OR MRI suggestive of meningeal enhancement on contrast enhanced T1 sequences AND
    • Deemed by the treating physician that the syndrome is consistent with chronic meningitis
  • Patients who are positive for antibodies to HIV and pregnant females will also be included.
  • MRI Brain
  • Ax T2 TSE
  • 3D Sag T1
  • Ax DWI
  • 3D Sag Flair
  • Ax SWI
  • Post-gad 3D Sag T1
  • 3D TOF Circle-of-Willis
  • MRI Spine
  • Sag T2 whole spine (2 stations)
  • Post-gad Sag T1 whole spine (2 stations)

Diagnostic criteria-TBM

  • Microbiologic evidence of TB in CSF
  • Microbiologic evidence of TB from pulmonary or extrapulmonary sites
  • Reasonable clinical certainty OR allied investigations such as CXR/CECT chest/abdomen/PET CT as per clinical indication suggestive of tuberculosis
  • Other relevant investigations like CSF analysis not suggestive of alternative diagnosis such as neurocysticercosis/cryptococcal/other fungal infections/other causes of chronic meningitis such as brucella/ nocardia/ syphilis/recurrent viral meningitis/ carcinomatous/ lymphomatous meningitis or non infective causes such as sarcoidoisis/sub-arachnoid hemorrhage etc.
  • Reasonable clinical certainty OR allied investigations such as CXR/CECT chest/abdomen/PET CT as per clinical indication ruling out competing diagnoses
  • Patients who develop features or test results suggestive of alternative diagnosis with will be considered to be not due to tubercular meningitis
Other Names:
  • Clinical composite criteria

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of sulcal tuberculomas in the diagnosis of tubercular meningitis
Time Frame: Day 1 of diagnosis or imaging acquisition
Sensitivity and specificity of sulcal tuberculomas compared with reference standard clinical composite criteria
Day 1 of diagnosis or imaging acquisition
Correlation of imaging findings with clinical outcomes
Time Frame: 6 months to 18 months, average 9 months after starting treatment
Correlation of imaging findings in tubercular meningitis and spinal tubercular arachnoiditis with clinical outcomes after completion of therapy The outcome parameters of interest will be modified Rankin scale, visual acuity at 3 months and end of therapy.
6 months to 18 months, average 9 months after starting treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical or imaging features of spinal tubercular arachnoiditis
Time Frame: Day 1 of diagnosis or imaging acquisition
Proportion of patients having clinical or imaging features of spinal tubercular arachnoiditis
Day 1 of diagnosis or imaging acquisition
Factors determining outcomes in patients with spinal tubercular arachnoiditis
Time Frame: 6 months to 18 months, average 9 months after starting treatment
Factors determining outcomes in patients with spinal tubercular arachnoiditis
6 months to 18 months, average 9 months after starting treatment
Treatment trends in patients with spinal tubercular arachnoiditis
Time Frame: 6 months to 18 months, average 9 months after starting treatment
Treatment trends in patients with spinal tubercular arachnoiditis
6 months to 18 months, average 9 months after starting treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 27, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

To be routed through proper channel through the ethics committee

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 3 months of request till five years after publication of results

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tuberculous Meningitis

Clinical Trials on MRI Brain and spine

3
Subscribe