Optimizing Acute Ischemic Stroke Diagnostics Using Artificial Intelligence (AI-STROKE)

October 14, 2023 updated by: Anne Hege Aamodt, Oslo University Hospital
Prospective observational multi-center study with the aim to organise and simplify the care pathway through a pragmatic approach to acute stroke imaging powered by cutting edge advances in image processing and artificial intelligence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke is highly effective and cost-effective. As of today, too few patients have access to thrombectomy. There is an urgent need to improve the diagnostics so that all eligible stroke patients have their occlusion detected fast enough and are offered thrombectomy when indicated. Machine learning based imaging techniques have recently been shown to provide improved diagnostic with automated methods for detection of vessel occlusion and ischemic lesions by use of artificial intelligence. We will perform a prospective interventional study in acute ischemic stroke patients with the aim to organize and simplify the care pathway through a pragmatic approach to acute stroke imaging powered by cutting edge advances in image processing and artificial intelligence. By using multiphase CT angiography and software at two primary stroke centres the utility of automatically evaluation of images will be compared to standard care. All images will in parallell be assessed by neuroradiologists at the comprehensive stroke centre.

The main objective is to organize and simplify the care pathway to acute stroke imaging powered by cutting edge advances in image processing and artificial intelligence.

The secondary objectives are to assess: 1) the diagnostic accuracy of mCTA in detection of vessel occlusion in ischemic stroke using AI-based analysis tools compared gold standard of MRI, 2) the percentage of eligible patients who receive EVT using AI-based analysis compared to standard care diagnostics 3) time from onset to recanalization, and 4) functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools compared to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.

Hypotheses: Novel AI-based image analysis tools applied to already available standard CT based imaging techniques can a) improve acute stroke diagnostics and b) increase the number of patients treated by EVT.

The main aim of the project is to organise and simplify the care pathway through a pragmatic approach to acute stroke imaging powered by cutting edge advances in image processing and artificial intelligence.

Secondary aims:

  1. To assess if the use of AI-based image analysis tools in radiological diagnostics in primary stroke centres can reduce the time from onset to recanalization in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT.
  2. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of mCTA in detection of medium and large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke using AI-based analysis tools compared to assessment by the gold standard of MRI (DWI and MR Angiography) assessed by neuroradiologists.
  3. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of mCTA in detection of medium and large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke using AI-based analysis tools compared to assessment by standard care.
  4. To assess if the use of available AI-based analysis tools applied to mCTA can increase the number of stroke patients eligible for and offered EVT.
  5. To compare functional outcome and patient related outcome measures 3 months after EVT in stroke patients who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.

Endpoints:

Primary Endpoints:

- Time from the start of CT scan of patients at the local hospital to radiological diagnosis in acute stroke patients with LVO and MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared to periods with standard care.

Secondary endpoints:

  • Time from the start of CT scan of patients at the local hospital to start of thrombectomy in patients identified with LVO and MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared to periods with standard care.
  • Time from symptom onset to start of thrombectomy in patients identified with LVO and MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO diagnosed by standard care.
  • Proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO diagnosed by standard care.
  • Proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared to assessment by neuroradiologists.
  • Proportion of patients treated with thrombectomy in MeVO in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO diagnosed by standard care.
  • Functional outcome 3 months after EVT in stroke patients who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools compared to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.
  • Patient related outcome measures 3 months after EVT in stroke patients who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools compared to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.

The present study is part of a prospective observational study of the thrombectomy service with collaboration between stroke units and radiological departments at primary and comprehensive stroke centres - the Oslo Acute Revascularization Stroke Study (OSCAR) (REK 2015/1844, EudraCT number 2018-004691-36). Data has already been collected since January 2017 in patients treated with EVT at Oslo University Hospital and by nearly 1100 patients treated with EVT have been included. The database contains detailed information on logistics, transport, clinical, radiological data, and treatment including rehabilitation from baseline to 3-month follow-up is registered prospectively.

The study will start with a 12-month period with registration before the implementation of the AI software. Data from this period and from the OSCAR study will be compared to the data collected after the implementation of the AI software. We will start the study at Drammen Hospital and will consecutively implement it at the other hospitals in Vestre Viken Hospital Trust and Østfold Hospital Trust. Data will be registered for at least 18 months after the implementation of the AI software. The length of the inclusion phase will be adjusted according to the inclusion rate.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Drammen, Norway
        • Recruiting
        • Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
        • Contact:
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Recruiting
        • Oslo University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Anne Hege Aamodt, MD PhD Prof
          • Phone Number: +47 23 07 00 00
          • Email: anhaam@ous-hf.no
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Thor H Skattør, MD PhD
      • Sarpsborg, Norway

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke at participating hospitals

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ischemic stroke.
  • All stroke severities and vascular distributions are eligible.
  • Informed written consent signed by the patient, verbal consent from the patient as witnessed by a non-participating health care person or consent by the signature of the patient's family must be provided before inclusion. Patients for whom no informed consent can be obtained will not be included in the study but will be treated according to standard guidelines.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients not available for follow-up assessments (e.g. non-resident).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from the start of CT scan of patients at the local hospital to radiological diagnosis in acute stroke patients with large and medium vessel occlusion in periods with the use of AI software compared to periods with standard care.
Time Frame: Day 0
Minutes
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from the start of CT scan of patients at the local hospital to start of thrombectomy in patients identified with large and medium vessel occlusion in periods with the use of AI software compared to periods with standard care.
Time Frame: Day 0
Minutes
Day 0
Time from symptom onset to start of thrombectomy in patients identified with LVO large and medium vessel occlusion in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with LVO and MeVO diagnosed by standard care.
Time Frame: Day 0
Minutes
Day 0
Proportion of patients identified with large and medium vessel occlusion in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with large and medium vessel occlusion diagnosed by standard care.
Time Frame: Day 0
Number of patients
Day 0
Proportion of patients treated with thrombectomy in large and medium vessel occlusion in periods with the use of AI software compared with proportion of patients identified with large and medium vessel occlusion diagnosed by standard care.
Time Frame: Day 0
Number of patients
Day 0
Functional outcome at 90 days after EVT in stroke patients who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools compared to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.
Time Frame: 90 days
Number of participants with independent functioning on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS 0 to 6), as defined by a score of 0-2. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a valid and reliable clinician-reported measure of global disability that has been widely applied for evaluating recovery from stroke. It is a scale used to measure functional recovery (the degree of disability or dependence in daily activities) of people who have suffered a stroke. mRS scores range from 0 (best outcome) to 6 (worst outcome), with 0 indicating no residual symptoms; 5 indicating bedbound, requiring constant care; and 6 indicating death.
90 days
Health-related quality of life at 90 days after EVT in stroke patients who had their initial radiological diagnosis using AI-based image analysis tools compared to stroke patients diagnosed by standard care.
Time Frame: 90 days
Health-related quality of life, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L at Day 90. The EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5-Dimensional 5-Level) is a generic instrument for describing and valuing health. It is based on a descriptive system that defines health in terms of five dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has five response categories corresponding to: no problems, slight, moderate, severe and extreme problems. The respondents will also rate their overall health on the day of the interview on a 0-100 visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS, higher scores mean better outcomes).
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Acute

3
Subscribe