The Effects of Open Versus Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises on Ankle Joint Function

August 11, 2023 updated by: Waseem Javaid, Sehat Medical Complex

The Effects of Open Versus Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises on Ankle Joint Function in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability

The goal of this Randomized clinical trial is to find the effects of open versus closed kinetic chain exercises on ankle joint function in athletes with chronic ankle instability. The main question it aims to answer is:

• To compare the effects of open versus closed kinetic chain exercises on pain, instability and balance in athletes with chronic ankle instability.

Participants were given consent form and after subjects read and signed the informed consent and completed the self-reported questionnaires designed to identify subjects with CHRONIC ANKLE INSTABILITY, subjects completed baseline measurements that included Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)-Sport Subscale, Reach distance, and SEBT. Participant were divided into two groups (Group A and Group B) through lottery method. Group A received open kinetic exercises 3times a week for 3-4 weeks. Group B received close kinetic exercises 3 times a week for 3-4 weeks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic instability is a common condition in sports and there are many treatment methods and rehabilitation protocols available which are used according to extent of injury. The purpose of this study is to find out the effects of close kinetic chain exercises and open kinetic chain exercises and to find out which technique is more efficient for treating ankle instability, pain, and imbalance in athletes with chronic ankle instability. This study will help physical therapists and medical team to enhance the rehabilitation process.

The study was randomized clinical trial conducted at Pakistan Sports board Lahore in which convenient random sampling technique was used. This study included total 26 participants and for this purpose Open Epi tool would be used as a sample size calculation. Participants falling in this category were recruited into the study after inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Cumberland ankle instability tool was used as a tool for pre and post assessment of athletes. In this study we divided population into two groups. Group A received open chain kinetic exercises and Group B was treated with Closed chain kinetic exercises. Data was analyzed through SPSS 25 version.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
        • Pakistan sports Board Lahore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male
  • Age 18-30years
  • Tennis, Football, Cricketers, volley ball and Hockey players
  • Athletes with balance problems
  • Chronic ankle injuries

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute injuries
  • Non-athletes (minimum once a week sports participation)
  • Athletes with pain related to calf muscles and achillies tendon

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Open chain exercises group
Group A(Open chain exercises group) received open kinetic exercises 3 times a week for 3-4 weeks.
An open chain exercise is one that allows the furthest part of the chain to move freely. For example, picking up a glass of water is an open-chain exercise. The hand affects the elbow and the shoulder as it is not fixed in place. However, it does not effect the rest of your body.
Active Comparator: Closed kinetic chain exercises group
Group B(Closed kinetic chain exercises group) received close kinetic exercises 3 times a week for 3-4 weeks.
Closed Kinetic Chain (CKC) exercises or closed chain exercises are exercises or movements where the distal aspect of the extremity is fixed to an object that is stationary.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric pain rating scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is commonly used to assess pain. Change in the NPRS across time can be interpreted with responsiveness indices.
4 weeks
Star excursion balance test.
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The SEBTs are functional tests that incorporate a single-leg stance on one leg with maximum reach of the opposite leg. The SEBTs are performed with the subject standing at the center of a grid placed on the floor, with 8 lines extending at 45° increments from the center of the grid. The 8 lines positioned on the grid are labeled according to the direction of excursion relative to the stance leg: anterolateral (AL), anterior (A), anteromedial (AM), medial (M), posteromedial (PM), posterior (P), posterolateral (PL), and lateral (L). The grid was constructed in an athletic training facility using a protractor and 3-in (7.62-cm)-wide adhesive tape and was enclosed in a 182.9-cm by 182.9-cm square on the hard tile floor.
4 weeks
Reach distance. (functional reach test)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Functional Reach (standing instructions): The patient is instructed to next to, but not touching, a wall and position the arm that is closer to the wall at 90 degrees of shoulder flexion with a closed fist. The assessor records the starting position at the 3rd metacarpal head on the yardstick. Instruct the patient to "Reach as far as you can forward without taking a step." The location of the 3rd metacarpal is recorded. Scores are determined by assessing the difference between the start and end position is the reach distance, usually measured in inches. Three trials are done and the average of the last two is noted.
4 weeks
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CHRONIC ANKLE INSTABILITYT) and Ankle Instability Instrument (AII)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CHRONIC ANKLE INSTABILITYT) is a PROM that can detect functional ankle instability and provide a measure of the severity of the instability . It does so through nine questions evaluating ankle pain, subjective instability during activities such as running or hopping and the ability of the ankle to cope with episodes of giving way . The answers for the nine questions are added up to a total score, which goes from 0 (indicating an extreme functional instability of the ankle) to 30 points (indicating a stable ankle)
4 weeks
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)-Sport Subscale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a patient-reported questionnaire for patients with muscu loskeletal foot and ankle disorders consisting of two sub scales, ADL and Sports, with a total of 32 questions. The FAAM is an evaluative self-reported instrument to comprehensively assess physical function of individu als with musculoskeletal disorders of the foot and ankle. It consists of an ADL (FAAM-ADL) and Sports (FAAM-Sport) subscale, containing 21 and 9 items, respectively. Standardized answer options are given in five-point Likert boxes, ranging from 0 (no difficulty at all) to 4 (unable to do). The sixth option is 'not applicable, which will not be taken into account when counting the percentage scores. According to Martin et al. we only calculated a total subscale if ≤2 items were missing (or inapplicable) in the FAAM-ADL and if ≤1 item was missing (or inapplicable) in the FAAM-Sport domain. A higher score represents a higher level of function in each subscale
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Muhammad Ahmed sajjad, MS-SPT, Riphah International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 28, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ahmadsajjad0446

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Injuries

Clinical Trials on Open chain exercises

Subscribe