The Effectiveness of Epidermal Growth Factor Serum in Improve Facial Skin Hydration, Elasticity, Pigmentation, and Wrinkles.

July 14, 2025 updated by: Supawee Phanmamuang, MD, Institute of Dermatology, Thailand

The Effectiveness of Epidermal Growth Factor Serum for the Improvement of Facial Skin Hydration, Elasticity, Pigmentation, and Wrinkles at the Institute of Dermatology: a Single-centered Pilot Study With a One-group Before-and-after Design

EGF is a polypeptide that promotes cell differentiation and collagen production while decreasing melanin production. This study is designed to study its effectiveness in improving the texture and appearance of facial skin after daily topical application. We hypothesized that EGF would improve facial skin hydration, elasticity, pigmentation, and wrinkles.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

All patients gave written informed consent for epidermal growth factor serum application on the face. The pilot study enrolls thirty patients compared to pre and post-serum used to evaluate facial skin hydration, transepidermal water loss, elasticity, pigmentation, and wrinkles measured by corneometer, tewameter, cutometer, visioscan, and mexameter respectively on day 0, then 8, 12, and 16 weeks. The study evaluates subject satisfaction and side effects after serum application as secondary outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10400
        • Institute of Dermatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Thai
  • Mild to moderate facial skin condition, as measured by 1-2 points on the hyperpigmentation status scale or 2-3 points on the wrinkle severity grading scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of lotions or skin care products containing ingredients such as vitamin A/C, hydroquinone, or anti-aging agents.
  • Sunbathing
  • Hypersensitivity to serum components
  • Pregnancy and breast-feeding
  • Active skin diseases such as eczema or atopic dermatitis at the application site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Epidermal Growth Factor Serum Application
Participants received Epidermal growth factor serum application on the face daily for two months compared to pre and post-results of skin quality.
Apply facial twice daily.
Other Names:
  • Epidermal Growth Factor Serum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Facial Skin Hydration
Time Frame: 4 months (Baseline, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16)
Facial skin hydration was measured using a Corneometer, which provides readings in arbitrary units (a.u.). Measurements were taken at baseline (Day 0), Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 under standardized environmental and procedural conditions to ensure reliability and accuracy. Higher values indicate better skin hydration, while lower values indicate increased dryness.
4 months (Baseline, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16)
Transepidermal Water Loss
Time Frame: 4 months
measured by tewameter on day 0, then at 8, 12, and 16 weeks.
4 months
Facial Skin Elasticity (R2 Parameter Via Cutometer)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Skin elasticity was assessed using a Cutometer with the R2 parameter (Ua/Uf), which measures gross elasticity. R2 values range from 0 to 1.0, with higher values indicating better skin elasticity. Measurements were collected under standardized conditions at Baseline (Day 0), Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16.
Baseline, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Facial Skin Wrinkles
Time Frame: 4 months
Visioscan measurements were taken at baseline, then at 8, 12, and 16 weeks by using a 4-grade percentage wrinkle improvement scale.
4 months
Facial Melanin Index
Time Frame: 4 months
Facial pigmentation was assessed using the Mexameter, which measures melanin content via light absorption and reflection. The device reports values on a scale from 0 to 999, where higher values represent greater melanin concentration. Measurements were collected at standardized facial sites at Baseline, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16. Higher scores indicate worse pigmentation.
4 months
Overall Facial Skin Appearance (Photo Evaluation Using SGAIS)
Time Frame: 4 months

Facial skin appearance was evaluated using the Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS), a 5-point scale where higher scores indicate greater improvement. Scores were assigned by two board-certified dermatologists who assessed photographs taken by the Visia-CR imaging system at Baseline, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16.

SGAIS scoring definition:

1 = Worse, 2 = Mild improvement (<25%), 3 = Moderate (25-49%), 4 = Much improved (50-74%), 5 = Very much improved (≥75%).

4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject Satisfaction in Improving Skin Hydration, Elasticity, Wrinkles, and Pigmentation
Time Frame: 4 months
Using a quartile grading system, (0 = unsatisfied), (1 = slightly satisfied), (2 = satisfied), and (3 = very satisfied)
4 months
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 4 months
Adverse events were systematically monitored at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks post-treatment initiation.
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chumsaeng Chumsaengsri, Institute of Dermatology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 008/2565

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe