EfFect of Ablation of Persistent AtriaL Fibrillation on COgNitive Function in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment

May 25, 2023 updated by: Poitiers University Hospital

EfFect of Ablation of Persistent AtriaL Fibrillation on COgNitive Function in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment : - The FALCON Study-

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Participants will be randomized into antiarrhythmic drugs alone or atrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Brest, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jacques MANSOURATI
      • Caen, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Pierre OLLITRAULT
      • Dijon, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Charles Guenancia
      • Paris, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
        • Contact:
          • Eloi Marijon
      • Poitiers, France
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Rodrigue Garcia
      • Saint-Denis, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Cardiologique du Nord
        • Contact:
          • Olivier Piot

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 60 to 85 years
  • Persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Patients with an indication for cardiac rhythm control.
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment score between 18 and 25 points corresponding to mild cognitive impairment
  • Free subject, not under temporary or permanent guardianship and not subject to subordination
  • Subject understanding and accepting the constraints of the study
  • Patient covered by French national health insurance or benefiting from it through a third party
  • Subject has given written consent to the study after having received clear and complete information

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Impossibility to perform the neuropsychological evaluation (communication problems such as hearing loss or aphasia, language barrier)
  • History of clinical stroke
  • Presence of a bruit at carotid auscultation or history of severe carotid stenosis
  • History or suspicion of neurodegenerative disease (Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis...), bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, severe depression or amyloidosis
  • Patient with history of previous atrial fibrillation ablation
  • Patient undergoing flutter ablation or atrial tachycardia ablation (not atrial fibrillation ablation)
  • Contraindication to atrial fibrillation ablation (intracardiac thrombus, severe pulmonary hypertension, mechanical mitral valve prosthesis or contraindication to anticoagulation,…)
  • Contraindication to antiarrhythmic drugs, or to implantable cardiac monitor
  • Patient with very advanced persistent atrial fibrillation, i.e., for more than 3 years or with a left atrial diameter >60 mm in parasternal long axis section or a left atrial volume > 48ml/m2 in echocardiography
  • Subject with a life expectancy of less than 24 months at study enrolment
  • Inability to consent
  • Persons benefiting from a reinforced protection, namely minors, persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, adults under legal protection, and finally patients in emergency situations
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, women at age to procreate and not using effective contraception (hormonal/barrier: oral, parenteral, percutaneous implantable, intrauterine device, or surgical: tubal ligation, hysterectomy, total ovariectomy)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Atrial fibrillation + antiarrhythmic drugs

The ablation can be done with different sources of energy (radiofrequency, cryoballoon or pulsed field ablation). Different sets of lesions can be performed but the cornerstone is pulmonary vein isolation which will be mandatory.

Antiarrhythmic drugs management will be at the operator discretion. Some operators may stop antiarrhythmic drugs after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Atrial fibrillation ablation will be performed with endovascular catheters and will be done either with radiofrequency, cryoballoon or pulsed field ablation.

Amiodarone, flecainide, sotalol, propafenone are the anti arrhythmic drugs allowed.

Active Comparator: Antiarrhythmic drugs alone

Antiarrhythmic drugs available available are amiodarone, flecainide, propafenone, sotalol.

If not previously started, patients randomized to antiarrhythmic drugs arm should start antiarrhythmic drugs therapy within 1 week of randomization.

Apart from these recommendations, antiarrhythmic drugs management will be at the operator discretion.

Amiodarone, flecainide, sotalol, propafenone are the anti arrhythmic drugs allowed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montreal Cognitive Assessmentquestionnaire score evolution 6 months
Time Frame: baseline (randomization) and 6 months after randomization
To evaluate the effect of "atrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs" on cognitive function as assessed by the change at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score between randomization (M0) and 6 months after randomization (M6), compared with "antiarrhythmic drugs alone" in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation associated with mild cognitive impairment. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates better cognitive performance.
baseline (randomization) and 6 months after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline characteristics associated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment score improvement
Time Frame: baseline (randomization) and 6 months after randomization
To define the baseline characteristics associated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment improvement between randomization (M0) and 6 months after randomization (M6) in patients with mild cognitive impairment and persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates better cognitive performance.
baseline (randomization) and 6 months after randomization
Changes in different types of cognitive functions
Time Frame: baseline (randomization) and 6 months after randomization
To assess changes in different cognitive functions measured by a comprehensive neurocognitive assessment between randomization (M0) and 6 months after randomization (M6). The assessed tests are : Free recall/indexed recall 16, WAIS IV "digit memory" subtest, Rapid Frontal Efficiency Battery (BREF) score, Trail Making Test (TMT- GREFEX version), Verbal fluency (GREFEX version) categorical (animals) and literal (letter P), Oral naming of the BETL (Battery for the Evaluation of Language Disorders), STROOP test (GREFEX version), Rey figure, Processing speed index from the WAIS IV.
baseline (randomization) and 6 months after randomization
Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score evolution 12 months
Time Frame: baseline (randomization) and 12 months after randomization
To evaluate the effect of "atrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs" on cognitive function as assessed by the change at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score between randomization (M0) and 12 months after randomization (M12), compared with "antiarrhythmic drugs alone". The Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates better cognitive performance.
baseline (randomization) and 12 months after randomization
Association between atrial fibrillation burden and cognitive function
Time Frame: baseline (randomization) and 12 months after randomization
To evaluate the association between atrial fibrillation burden and cognitive function as assessed by the change at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score between randomization (M0) and 12 months after randomization (M12). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher score indicates better cognitive performance.
baseline (randomization) and 12 months after randomization
Quality of life Short Form Survey (SF-12)
Time Frame: baseline (randomization), 6 and 12 months after randomization
To evaluate the effect of "atrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs" on quality of life assessed by the change at the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) between randomization (M0), 6 and 12 months after randomization (M6 and M12), compared with "antiarrhythmic drugs alone". Score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.
baseline (randomization), 6 and 12 months after randomization
Quality of life QOL-AD
Time Frame: baseline (randomization), 6 and 12 months after randomization
To evaluate the effect of "atrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs" on quality of life assessed by the change at the Quality of life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) questionnaire scores between randomization (M0), 6 and 12 months after randomization (M6 and M12), compared with "antiarrhythmic drugs alone". Score ranges from 13 to 52. The higher the score, the better quality of life the participant has.
baseline (randomization), 6 and 12 months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Atrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs

3
Subscribe