COG-REAGENT: COGnitive tRaining in patiEnts With Amnestic Mild coGnitive impairmENT

July 17, 2023 updated by: Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

The Efficacy of COGnitive tRaining in patiEnts With Amnestic Mild coGnitive impairmENT (COG-REAGENT): a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial

This study evaluates the efficacy and mechanism of internet-based cognitive training in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Half of participants will receive multi-domain adaptive internet-based training program, while the other half will receive a fixed, primary difficulty level task.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common dementia and the major cause for senile dementia. With the increase of life expectancy, AD has become a global problem. However, to date, drug therapies only have modest benefits for patients with AD. Recently, researchers have begun to focus on early intervention of AD at its preclinical stages. Individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), often the prodromal stage of AD, report mild short-term memory difficulties but preserved independence in activities of daily living. The aMCI stage is important to slow or even prevent the development of AD. Some previous studies have suggested cognitive training is a potential non-pharmacological intervention for aMCI, however, the results were inconsistent. Thus, investigators will conduct this multi-center randomized controlled trial to explore whether and how cognitive training improves cognitive function in patients with aMCI.

Objectives: The first aim of this multi-center single-blinded, randomized controlled trial is to assess whether internet-based cognitive training improves cognitive abilities in patients with aMCI. Furthermore, the second objective is to evaluate the effect of cognitive training on neural plasticity, including brain activation and white matter integrity, which are assessed by functional and structural MRI.

Patients and Methods: The study will include 260 patients diagnosed with aMCI from eight centers around China. The patients will be randomized to either a cognitive training group or an active-control group. The intervention is 12-week internet-based cognitive training performed for 40 minutes per day, 4 days a week. Within each task, high accuracy (80%) is required to upgrade to the next difficulty level. The active- control group will receive five processing speed and attention tasks, whose duration also total to 40 min each training day. However, these tasks are set to a fixed, primary difficulty level across the study.

Neuropsychological assessments and structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be performed at the baseline, end of intervention, and 6 months after randomization to measure long-term resilience of the effect.

Relevance: Early intervention of aMCI has the potential to delay or even prevent the development of dementia. Some previous studies have suggested cognitive training is a potential non-pharmacological intervention for aMCI, however, the results were inconsistent. Thus, the proposed study is to determine the efficacy of cognitive training in patients with aMCI. Secondly, using functional and structural MRI, this study is to reveal the potential mechanisms underlying cognitive training.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

260

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100053
        • Recruiting
        • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Literate Han Chinese, 50-85 years of age with a caregiver that accompanies the subject consistently at least 4 days a week;
  2. Complaint and/or informant report of a cognitive impairment lasting for at least 3 months;
  3. Clinical diagnosis of MCI according to the MCI core clinical criteria of the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) guidelines;
  4. A prominent manifestation of memory deficit with or without other cognitive domain impairments;
  5. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥24, and Clinical dementia rating (CDR) = 0.5, and
  6. Normal or slightly impaired activities of daily living as defined by a total score of ≤ 1.5 on the three functional CDR domains (home and hobbies, community affairs, and personal care).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe aphasia, physical disabilities, or any other disease that may preclude completion of neuropsychological testing;
  2. A medical history of stroke with focal neurological features including hemiparesis, sensory loss, visual field deficits, and evidence of responsible lesions on MRI;
  3. Significant white matter lesions (Fazekas score = 3-6);
  4. Disorders other than aMCI that may affect cognition;
  5. Depression or other psychiatric disorders;
  6. Clinically significant gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, respiratory, infectious, endocrine, or cardiovascular diseases, cancer, alcoholism, drug addiction;
  7. Use of medications that may affect cognitive functioning, including tranquilizers, anti-anxiolytics, hypnotics, nootropics, and cholinomimetic agents;
  8. Inability to undergo a brain MRI; and
  9. Other conditions that in the investigator's opinion might not be suitable for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive training group
Multi-domain adaptive internet-based training program, including processing speed, attention, long-term memory, working memory, flexibility, calculation, and problem solving. 4 x 40 minutes per week, for 12 weeks.
The training paradigms include a time perception task, visual search task, rapid serial presentation task, delayed match to sample task, paired-associate recall task, attention span task, digit span task, go-no go task, Stroop task, task switching, auditory span task and n-back working memory task. Each task has several difficulty levels. The tasks are grouped in different cognitive domains including: processing speed, attention, perception, long-term memory, working memory, calculation, executive control, reasoning, and problem-solving. Participants in the cognitive training group will complete 40 min of training daily, 4 days a week for 12 weeks. When a high accuracy (80%) is achieved for each task, the level of difficulty will be upgraded for that task.
Active Comparator: Active-control group
Fixed, primary difficulty level tasks. 4 x 40 minutes per week, for 12 weeks.
For the control group, tasks for processing speed and attention are included. Importantly, a fixed, primary difficulty level for all participants in the control group is set.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. MoCA ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.
12 weeks (end of intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog, 11-items version).
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
ADAS-cog 11 scale ranges from 0 to 70, and higher value represents a worse outcome. This study will use ADAS-cog to assess changes in the global cognitive function after intervention.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in brain volume and white matter integrity
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Structural MRI will be used to measure brain volume and white matter integrity.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in brain connectivity
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Functional MRI will be used to measure brain connectivity.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in Mini-mental State Examination
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. MMSE ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: 6 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. MoCA ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.
6 months
Change in memory function
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
WHO-UCLA Auditory Verbal Learning Test will be used to assess memory function. It ranges from 0 to 45, and higher value represents a better outcome.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in Digit span forward
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Digit span will be used to assess attention. It ranges from 3 to 10, and higher value represents a better outcome.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in Digit span backward
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Digit span backward will be used to assess executive function. It ranges from 2 to 8, and higher value represents a better outcome.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in Trail Making Test
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Trail-Making Test B minus A score will be used to assess executive function. Trail-Making Test B minus A ranges from -150 to 300, higher value represents a worse outcome.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in Boston Naming Test
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Boston Naming Test will be used to assess language function. It ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale will be used to assess the change of life quality. It ranges from 20 to 80. The "20" represents normal life ability and the higher score presents the worse life ability.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale sum of the boxes
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Clinical Dementia Rating Scale sum of the boxes (CDR-SB) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. CDR-SB ranges from 0 to 18, and higher value represents a worse outcome.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) Scale will be used to evaluate the life quality of the patients. The total score is 13-52, with higher scores indicating better QoL.
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Change in Cookie Theft picture description task
Time Frame: 12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months
Cookie Theft picture description task will be used to evaluate spontaneous discourse. We will analyze the total number of syllables produced, the total number of information units produced, and the total time taken to describe the picture
12 weeks (end of intervention), 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019042-XZ1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on multi-domain internet-based adaptive training program

3
Subscribe