- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05829759
Telehealth Delivery (Tele-B6)
Brothers Building Brothers by Breaking Barriers for Telehealth Delivery (Tele-B6)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
- Grady Infectious Diseases Program Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Black race, inclusive of multiracial identities male gender, inclusive of transgender men
- self-identification as gay, bisexual, or another non-heterosexual orientation, and/or any history of consensual anal or oral sex with men
- HIV-positive serostatus
- age 18-29 years inclusive
- residence in the Atlanta Metropolitan Statistical Area
- available and interested in meeting for two hours weekly over five weeks.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 18 years or > 30 years
- Unwilling or unable to provide written informed consent
- Enrollment in one phase of the study is an exclusion criterion for enrollment in other phases
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Tele-B6
The tele-B6 intervention includes five group sessions delivered over the course of five weeks.
Survey assessments for the intervention group will be conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (immediate post-intervention survey), 4 months (interim-survey, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline).
|
Participants will be part of the Tele-B6 intervention that includes five group sessions delivered over the course of five weeks.
Survey assessments for the intervention group (first phase) will be conducted at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (immediate post-intervention survey), 4 months (interim-survey, post-intervention), and 6 months (endline).
|
|
Other: Wait-list control -delayed intervention
A wait-list control design to safeguard ethical treatment of participants by ensuring that a potentially impactful intervention will be available to all after a brief waiting period.
|
Wait-list control participants will be assigned to initiate the full intervention at month 2 after their enrollment (i.e., after they and their corresponding intervention group have completed their intervention and one follow-up survey).
Wait-list control participants will complete surveys at enrollment (baseline), 2 months (pre-intervention), 4 months (immediate post-intervention), and 6 months (endline).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability Scale
Time Frame: Study Exit (up to 6 months)
|
Post-session evaluation forms were administered after each intervention session and were evaluated collectively at the end of the study.
This evaluation form included 7 statements (examples: "I felt comfortable in this virtual space", "I am confident I can apply the tools we learned today to my life") to be answered on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., 5=strongly agree, 4=agree, 3=neutral, 2=disagree, 1=strongly disagree) as well as open ended questions (e.g., what did you like most?)
|
Study Exit (up to 6 months)
|
|
Number of Attended Sessions
Time Frame: During intervention sessions up to 5 weeks (5 weeks total)
|
Attendance was assessed using session logs recorded at each intervention visit, capturing the number of sessions attended during the five-week intervention period.
For the immediate intervention arm (Tele-B6), attendance was recorded from baseline through completion of the five-week intervention (up to 2 months post-enrollment).
For the delayed intervention (wait-list control) arm, attendance was recorded during the five-week intervention delivered between months 2 and 4 of study participation.
|
During intervention sessions up to 5 weeks (5 weeks total)
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (Safety)
Time Frame: During study participation up to 6 months
|
Review of Adverse Event Tracking Forms during study participation up to six months.
|
During study participation up to 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Material Resources Survey
Time Frame: 0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
Participants will complete the material resources survey to measure socioeconomic status.
The material resources survey has 18 questions that ask how often the participants' family needs are adequately met.
Items addressed resources such as having food for two meals a day, a house or apartment, money to pay monthly bills, time to get enough sleep/rest, and money to save.
There are six options (never=0; rarely=1; less than half of the time=w, about half of the time=3; more than half of the time=4; and always=5).
A sum score was computed with a potential range from 0 (never enough resources for all items) to 5 (always enough resources for all items), with a higher score indicative of more resources.
The highest score means that needs are adequately met.
|
0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
|
Everyday Discrimination Scale
Time Frame: 0, 2, 4 months
|
Participants will complete the Everyday Discrimination Scale at baseline and after each session.
Each response is assigned a value on the Likert scale ('never'=1 to 'almost every day'=6).
Responses are averaged across items to produce a score ranging from 1 to 6.
A higher score may indicate a higher perception of discrimination.
|
0, 2, 4 months
|
|
Perception of HIV Stigma Scale
Time Frame: 0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
Participants will complete the HIV stigma scale at baseline and after each session.
This scale includes 10 items, stigma rated on a 5-point scale from "Strongly Disagree"= 1 to "Strongly Agree"=5.
For scoring, items are averaged, with higher total scores indicating greater perceived HIV stigma.
|
0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
|
Personal Social Capital Scale
Time Frame: 0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
Participants will complete the personal social capital scale.
The Personal Social Capital Scale (PSCS) measures an individual's personal social capital, assessing both bonding capital (strong ties like family/close friends) and bridging capital (weaker ties to diverse groups) through cognitive (trust, reciprocity) and structural (network size, frequency) elements, to understand resources for health, support, and behavior.
A five-point Likert scale is used to assess these questions, with 1 = none and 5 = all.
A composite score will be derived by summarizing the item scores.
The overall score range is typically 8 to 40 points.
Higher scores indicate greater personal social capital, meaning the individual has a larger, more trustworthy social network with more resources and support available.
Lower scores suggest fewer social connections and resources, which may be associated with increased stress or poorer health outcomes.
|
0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Studies Depression Scale Greater Than 16
Time Frame: 0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
Participants will complete the Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) survey. In scoring the CES-D, a value of 0, 1, 2, or 3 is assigned to a response depending upon whether the item is worded positively or negatively. The possible range of scores is 0 to 60, with the higher scores indicating greater symptomatology. The standard cut-off score on the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to indicate a risk for clinical depression is 16 or higher. Scores are interpreted as follows: 0-14: Mild or no depressive symptoms 15-23: Moderate or significant depressive symptoms 24 or higher: Severe depressive symptoms |
0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
|
General Well-being (GWB) Survey
Time Frame: 0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
Participants will complete the general well-being (GWB) survey.
The General Well-Being Schedule (GWB) is designed to assess an individual's mental health or quality of life.
The GWB consists of 18 items indicating subjective feelings of psychological well-being and distress.
All of the items utilize the past month as the time frame of interest.
The first 14 questions use a six-point rating scale that represents either intensity or frequency.
The remaining items use a 0-10 rating scale that is anchored by adjectives.
Because some items are reverse scored (items 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 15, and 16), 14 is subtracted from the total score, yielding a total possible range of scores from 0 to 110.
Low scores represent greater distress.
Proposed cutoffs representing three levels of distress are 0-60 (severe distress), 61-72 (moderate distress), and 73-110 (positive well-being).
|
0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Qualitative Description of Intersectional Stigma
Time Frame: Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
Participants will be asked to complete surveys with open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide.
There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview.
|
Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
|
Qualitative Description of Logistical Barriers
Time Frame: Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide.
There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview.
|
Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
|
Perception of Individual Resilience Process: Identity Affirmation
Time Frame: 0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
Participants will complete the multidimensional model of black identity lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity scale,
|
0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
|
Qualitative Description of the Minority Stress
Time Frame: Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide.
There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview.
|
Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
|
Qualitative Description Individual Resilience Process: Identity Affirmation
Time Frame: Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide.
There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview.
|
Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
|
Intersectional Stigma
Time Frame: Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
Participants will be asked to complete surveys with open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide.
There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview.
|
Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
|
Qualitative Description of the Community Resilience Process: Social Capital
Time Frame: Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
Participants will be asked to complete open-ended questions adapted from the original B6 exit interview guide.
There is no summary score of the open-ended questions asked during the interview.
|
Exit of study (up to 6 months)
|
|
Logistical Barriers
Time Frame: 0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
Participants will be asked to complete surveys and matched to a Zipcode to derive neighborhood measures.
|
0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
|
Perception of the Internalized Homonegativity Inventory
Time Frame: 0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
Participants will complete the Internalized Homonegativity Inventory at baseline and after each session. This 26-item scale has four subscales: (a) Public Identification as Gay, (b) Perception of Stigma Associated with Being Gay, (c) Social Comfort with Gay Men, (d) Moral and Religious Acceptability of Being Gay. |
0, 2, 4, 6 months
|
|
HIV Viral Load
Time Frame: 0 and 6 months
|
The research team will review the electronic medical record (EMR) to abstract HIV viral load information
|
0 and 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sophia A. Hussen, MD, MPH, Emory University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Blood-Borne Infections
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Infections
- RNA Virus Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Communicable Diseases
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Lentivirus Infections
- Retroviridae Infections
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
- HIV Infections
- Behavior
- Sexual Behavior
- Sexuality
- HIV Seropositivity
- Bisexuality
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00003404
- R34MH129187-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- 2025P013132 (Other Identifier: Emory Insight Humans IRB)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV Seropositivity
-
ANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesINSERM UMR S 1136; iPLespNot yet recruitingHIV Infections | HIV Seropositivity | HIV Drug Resistance
-
University of California, San DiegoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; University of Southern California; California... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University of WashingtonHealth Alliance International; Beira Operations Research Center, Mozambique...Completed
-
Brown UniversityCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Completed
-
University of California, BerkeleyNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Ministry of Health and Social Welfare...Completed
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Completed
-
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de HidalgoNational Council of Science and Technology, MexicoCompleted
-
University of ZimbabweNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Fogarty International...Completed
-
Bayside HealthMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCUnknown
Clinical Trials on Tele-B6
-
Education University of Hong KongCompletedMental Health | LonelinessHong Kong
-
Education University of Hong KongUniversity of Texas at Austin; City University of Hong KongRecruiting
-
Boehringer IngelheimRecruitingHealthy | Obesity | OverweightUnited Kingdom
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterUniversity of Texas at AustinCompleted
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute on Aging (NIA); BioSensicsActive, not recruitingCognitive Impairment | Dementia | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Memory LossUnited States
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleRecruiting
-
Clalit Health ServicesTerminated
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Active, not recruitingAutism Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
Aravind Eye Care SystemLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineCompletedDiabetic RetinopathyIndia
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterAmerican Heart AssociationNot yet recruitingPeripheral Artery Disease | Ischemia Reperfusion Injury