Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Stroke Exercise Preference Inventory

April 7, 2025 updated by: Halime ARIKAN, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
With this study, it will be proven whether the Turkish version of the Stroke Exercise Preference Inventory is valid and reliable in evaluating the exercise preferences of individuals who have had a stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Version, validity, and reliability studies are frequently encountered in the literature. However, there is no scale that evaluates the exercise preferences of individuals who have had a stroke among the measurement tools whose Turkish version, validity, and reliability studies have been carried out. The Stroke Exercise Preference Inventory is an outcome scale for questioning exercise preferences in individuals who have had a stroke. It is functional for the development and planning of exercise programs for individuals who have had a stroke. This scale will both fill the gap in the Turkish literature in terms of the parameters it evaluates and will be the first in this context. In terms of its application, it is a useful inventory in this field. Considering the absence of a measurement tool developed in Turkish or adapted to Turkish for the assessment of exercise preferences of individuals with stroke, the aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the self-administered Stroke Exercise Preference Inventory, designed to question exercise preferences in Turkish individuals with stroke, to perform cross-cultural adaptation study, and to question the suitability of the Turkish version for Turkish society and the effectiveness of its clinical use.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Kırıkkale, Turkey, 71300
        • Kırıkkale University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Who have had a stroke,
  • Good cognitive status,
  • Can speak, read, write Turkish.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant,
  • Who cannot speak, read or write Turkish.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Individuals who have had a stroke
To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Stroke Exercise Preference Inventory
Other: Reliability and validity study
To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Stroke Exercise Preference Inventory

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exercise preference
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
The Stroke Exercise Preference Inventory was developed in 2016 as an inventory consisting of 13 items. The inventory also includes 9 items that assess exercise barriers. The Stroke Exercise Preference Inventory is very useful and beneficial for clinicians in terms of determining the exercise preferences of individuals who have had a stroke and questioning the thoughts of the individual in continuing the exercise and rehabilitation program. It is functional for the development and planning of exercise programs for individuals who have had a stroke. Inventory scores as a percentage. And the decreasing score indicates the negativity of participation and view of the exercise.
through study completion, an average of 6 month
Cognitive status
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
The Mini Mental Test will be used to quantitatively assess cognitive performance. It consists of eleven items gathered under five main headings as orientation, recording memory, attention and calculation, recall and language, and is evaluated out of a total score of 30. A minimum of 24 points must be obtained.
through study completion, an average of 6 month
Functional ambulation
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
The Functional Ambulation Classification will be used for the evaluation of ambulation in individuals. The Functional Ambulation Classification shows the support surfaces that walking patients receive. It is valuable when starting to step and walk from the immobility period. It is calculated over a total of 6 categories by scoring between 0 and 5.
through study completion, an average of 6 month
Activity status
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
The Frenchay Activities Index is a 15-item index that was created to collect information about daily and social activities, questioning what activities and how often they do in stroke patients. While the first 10 items ask individuals to estimate the frequency of household chores such as preparing meals and washing clothes in the last 3 months, the next 5 items ask them to indicate the frequency of social activities such as travel and gardening in the last six months. Response scores range from 0 (never) to 3 (at least 1 per week). The total scoring range is between 0 (no participation) and 45 (frequent participation).
through study completion, an average of 6 month
Stroke-specific quality of life
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
The Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale consists of 49 items and 12 domains to assess the quality of life of individuals diagnosed with stroke. These areas are; mobility (6 items), energy (3 items), upper extremity function (5 items), work production (3 items), temperament (5 items), self-care (5 items), social role (5 items), family role ( 3 items), vision (3 items), language (5 items), thinking (3 items) and personality traits (3 items). The items were graded with a Likert-type scoring ranging from 1 to 5. Rating was made as 1. Strongly agree, 2. Partially agree, 3. Undecided, 4. Partially disagree, 5. Strongly disagree. A high scale score indicates a high quality of life, and a low scale score indicates a low quality of life.
through study completion, an average of 6 month
Exercise benefits and barriers
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
The Benefits / Barriers of Exercise Scale consists of 24 items, 2 open-ended questions and six sub-dimensions. While 12 of the 24 items of the scale consist of statements about the benefits of exercise, the other 12 are made up of statements that prevent exercise. Negative items are coded in reverse. The scale is evaluated with a 4-point Likert scale. It is scored as 4 (Strongly Agree), 3 (Agree), 2 (Disagree), and 1 (Strongly Disagree). The scale is evaluated over the total score (min=24, max= 96). Higher scores indicate a perception of greater exercise benefits and less exercise barriers.
through study completion, an average of 6 month
Exercise behaviour
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
Behavioral Regulations in Exercise Scale-2 consists of 19 items and five subscales. These are: external regulation, introjective regulation, identification regulation, internal regulation and amotivation subscales. The Behavioral Regulations in Exercise Scale-2 is a 5-point Likert-type scale with a score between 0-4, consisting of "not at all true", "sometimes true" and "definitely true". Increasing and decreasing scores according to the sub-scales express positive and negative behavioral thoughts.
through study completion, an average of 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 13, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 83116987-272

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Only researchers in the study will have access to individual data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Reliability and validity study

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Papua New Guinea

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe