Implementation of Enhanced Recovery in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery (ERAS)

April 23, 2023 updated by: Ali Yavuzcan

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery Improve Breastfeeding and Maternal Perioperative Outcomes

Aim: The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes in women who implemented the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery after Surgery) protocol at delivery by cesarean delivery(CD).

Methods: The women who underwent CD with ERAS or standard perioperative care (SC) were randomized. In terms of the time to first flatus (TFF), visual pain score (VAS), successful breastfeeding, time of initiation of breastfeeding, time to returning to daily activities, hemoglobin values, postoperative nausea and vomiting, readmission to the hospital, postoperative wound infection, postpartum blues (PB) and the need for blood transfusion were compared between two groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Our study was conducted as a prospective study in the Obstetric and Gynecology Department of the Düzce University Faculty of Medicine. The study was initiated after the Düzce University Ethics Committee approval(no: KAEK/2020/239). The study followed the principles set out in the Declaration of Helsinki. Pregnant women aged ≥18 years and ≥37 weeks of gestational age who were admitted to our hospital between November 2020 and February 2021 were included in the study. Pregnant women who underwent CD with an indication for emergency cesarean (pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, placenta previa, detached placenta, fetal distress, infection, disease causing systemic morbidity, or intestinal adhesions secondary to previous operations) were excluded. In addition, pregnant women with any substance addiction and those who did not give informed consent were excluded from the study. Women who did not comply with the study protocols during were not included. Informed consent was obtained from all pregnant women before starting the study. Women who accepted to participate in the study and met the criteria were given the ERAS and control group protocol cards without being shown, upside down, and patients who would or would not receive the ERAS protocol were randomized accordingly. Age, body mass index (BMI), gravidy, parity, gestational age, indication, hemogram value, anesthesia method, presence of comorbidities, and contact information were recorded.

Women who underwent CD and received standard perioperative care (SC) constituted the control group.15 Patients in the SC group who were hospitalized for CD were discontinued from oral water intake and nutrition preoperatively at 00:00 the night before CD. Pethidine hydrochloride was administered as an opioid in addition to postoperative oral paracetamol and parenteral diclofenac sodium after surgery. The bladder catheter was withdrawn at the 6 th postoperative hour, and out-of-bed mobilization was started then. Oral feeding was started after first flatus. Dressings were applied in the morning on the 1st and 2nd postoperative day.

Pregnant women to whom the ERAS protocol would be implemented were given detailed information by explaining the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative ERAS elements. They signed the informed consent forms. The study group was formed with patients who received the ERAS protocol. The ERAS Practice Guideline in CD for the pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative care were implamented.16-18 The women in ERAS group was not be encouraged to drink clear liquids until 2 hour (h) before surgery, to eat a light meal 6 h before surgery or to receive oral carbohydrate supplementation 2 h before CD since the anesthesia department of our hospital did not approve. We could not given antacids and histamine H2 receptor as premedication to women in ERAS group. All of the subjects implemented or not in both ERAS and SC groups were summarized in Table 1. Perioperative information and implementation of ERAS protocol items were checked and recorded in the ERAS protocol checklist. After discharge, patients were called from the contact addresses they provided to check their status and get information and were called to the outpatient clinic within 2 weeks after discharge.

Postoperative pain was calculated with the visual pain score (Visual Analog Scale, VAS) in all patients included in our study. All patients in SC group and in the ERAS protocol group were asked to place a line between 0 and 10 on a horizontal line describing their pain status. The mildest pain represented as 0 and 10 represented the most severe pain.19 The time of first flatulence (TFF)20 and the time of first breastfeeding were recorded as hours. Women were asked when they were able to do things such as eating, walking, and taking care of their baby without assistance and feeling comfortable. The time to return to daily activities is indicated in days. Patients who re-admitted to the hospital within 30 days were considered as readmission.20 The preoperative Hb and the postoperative Hb level (ΔHb) were calculated as gr/dl. It has been accepted that successful breastfeeding is achieved in newborns who are given only breast milk in the appropriate position without formula or additional food.21 The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has been shown to induce a desire for early discharge in all patients after CD.22-23 In our study, an objective evaluation of length of hospital stay could not be made since the discharge times of the patients were affected by COVID-19 pandemic.

The study results were reported in accordance with the CONSORT guideline.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Düzce, Turkey, 81620
        • Ali Yavuzcan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Pregnant women aged ≥18 years and ≥37 weeks of gestational age who were admitted to our hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • aged ≥18 years
  • ≥37 weeks of gestational age
  • admitted to our hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women who underwent CD with an indication for emergency cesarean (pregnancy complications such
  • preeclampsia,
  • placenta previa,
  • detached placenta,
  • fetal distress, infection,
  • disease causing systemic morbidity,
  • intestinal adhesions secondary to previous operations) .
  • pregnant women with any substance addiction
  • those who did not give informed consent were excluded from the study.
  • Women who did not comply with the study protocols during were not included.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Group 1
standard perioperative care (SC)
Group 2
Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative pain
Time Frame: 30 day
Visual Analogue Scale
30 day
Time to first flatus
Time Frame: 30 day
hour
30 day
time to returning to daily activities
Time Frame: 30 day
day
30 day
ΔHb
Time Frame: 30 day
gr/dl
30 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the breastfeeding initiation time
Time Frame: 30 day
hour
30 day
Successful breastfeeding
Time Frame: 30 day
newborns who are given only breast milk in the appropriate position without formula or additional food
30 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ali S Yavuzcan, PhD, Duzce University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 17, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

3
Subscribe