High-intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Therapy for Asymptomatic Patients With Positive Coronary Calcium (DECISION-CAL)

January 12, 2025 updated by: Seung-Hyuk Choi, Samsung Medical Center

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Combination Versus StanDard carE in AsymptomatiC PatIentS wIth Presence of COroNary Artery CALCIUM (DECISION-CAL)

The aim of this study is to compare safety and efficacy between the aggressive treatment with combination of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe and the current standard lipid lowering treatment in asymptomatic patients with presence of coronary calcification.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD), such as myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, or peripheral arterial disease, are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The causality of low-density lipoproteins cholesterol (LDL-C) level in the development of ASCVD is well demonstrated in previous studies. After introducing LDL-C lowering agents, multiple large-scale randomized clinical trials have demonstrated lower cardiovascular events with lowering LDL-C levels. In particular, for secondary prevention, more aggressive control of LDL-C levels with high-intensity statin therapy significantly reduced cardiovascular events compared with moderate-intensity statin therapy. In addition, the Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) proved the clinical efficacy of additive ezetimibe for incrementally lowering of LDL-C levels in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, there has been limited evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of aggressive lipid-lowering strategy using high-intensity statin with a combination of ezetimibe for primary prevention of cardiovascular events among persons without cardiovascular disease. Although the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE)-3 and Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trials consistently identified that the use of rosuvastatin (10 mg or 20 mg) was significantly associated with reduced future risk of major cardiovascular events in patients who did not have cardiovascular disease, those studies have been focused on the use of statin, not on the intensity of statin.

The coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, a marker of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, has become popular for individuals at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. CAC is strongly associated with atherosclerotic burden and predicts coronary heart disease events and mortality, regardless of their age, sex, race, or ASCVD risk. Furthermore, the progression of CAC is associated with an increased risk for future hard and total coronary heart disease events. The use of CAC scoring was associated with significant improvements in the reclassification and discrimination of incident ASCVD. Nevertheless, the current guidelines recommend CAC measurement for selected cases only with borderline or intermediate risk of ASCVD to guide the use of statin or not. However, in real-world practice, CAC testing is increasingly being promoted to the public as a means of self-assessment of cardiovascular risk and is widely being used regardless of ASCVD risk. Considering that statin has additional properties, including atherosclerotic plaque stabilization, oxidative stress reduction, enhancement of endothelial function, and a decrease in vascular inflammation beyond their lipid-lowering effect, aggressive treatment with a high-intensity statin plus ezetimibe combination might have beneficial effects on the long-term clinical outcomes for asymptomatic patients with significant coronary calcium (Agatston Score ≥ 100) compared with standard lipid-lowering therapy endorsed by the current guidelines.

Therefore, the purpose of DECISION-CALCIUM (Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Combination versus StanDard carE in AsymptomatiC PatIentS wIth Presence of COroNary Artery CALCIUM) trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of the aggressive lipid-lowering therapy with combination of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe, compared with the current standard lipid-lowering therapy in asymptomatic patients with significant coronary calcification for primary prevention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

6000

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 06351
        • Recruiting
        • SamsungMedicalCenter
        • Contact:
          • Seunghyuk Choi, PhMD
          • Phone Number: 82-2-3410-3437

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must be at least 40 years of age.
  • Asymptomatic patients with presence of coronary calcification (Agatston Score ≥ 100)
  • low-density lipoproteins cholesterol (LDL-C) <190 mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Objective evidence of at least moderate inducible ischemia requiring revascularization treatment
  • History of cerebrovascular disease
  • History of coronary or peripheral arterial revascularization
  • Active liver disease or persistent unexplained serum transaminase elevations more than 2 times the upper limit of normal range
  • History of any adverse drug reaction requiring discontinuation of statin (e, g. rhabdomyolysis)
  • Allergy or sensitivity to any statin or ezetimibe
  • Concurrent treatment with cyclosporine or a condition likely to result in organ transplantation and the need for cyclosporine
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment)
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Aggressive treatment arm
In this group, high-intensity statin (rosuvastatin 20mg) combined with ezetimibe 10 mg will be prescribed regardless of patients' age, concomitant diabetes mellitus, or ASCVD risk.
Rosuvastatin 20 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg
Active Comparator: Standard treatment arm
In this group, lipid lowering therapy will be followed according to the current guideline recommendation. A moderate-intensity statin (rosuvastatin 5 mg) will be prescribed for patients over 75 years of age or with diabetes mellitus. For non-diabetic patients aged 40-75 years, the use of statins will be determined by calculating the ASCVD risk score. (ASCVD risk <7.5%: no statin use, ≥7.5 - <20%: moderate-intensity statin [rosuvastatin 5mg], ≥ 20%: high-intensity statin [rosuvastatin 20mg])
At least moderate intensity statin, recommended by the current guideline based on the ASCVD risk

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major adverse cardiovascular events
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
a composite of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned coronary revascularization, or other arterial revascularization procedure
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause death
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Death from any causes
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Cardiovascular death
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Death from cardiovascular causes
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Stroke
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Unplanned coronary revascularization
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
revascularization procedure to coronary artery
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Arterial revascularization procedure
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
All arterial revascularization procedure
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Major bleeding
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3-5
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Bleeding
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
BARC type 2-5
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Heart failure hospitalization
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Hospitalization due to heart failure
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Coronary calcium progression
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Delta CAC
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Changes of LDL-C
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Delta LDL-C
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
New-onset diabetes mellitus
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Occurence of new-onset diabetes mellitus
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Hepatic disorder requiring discontinuation of statin
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Occurence of hepatic disorder requiring discontinuation of statin
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
muscle-related adverse events
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Occurence of muscle-related adverse events due to statin
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Proportion of patients with LDL-C < 100mg/dL
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Proportion of patients with LDL-C < 100mg/dL
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Proportion of patients with LDL-C < 70mg/dL
Time Frame: up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)
Proportion of patients with LDL-C < 70mg/dL
up to 4.5 years of median follow-up (till 3 year after the last patient enrollment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Seung-Hyuk Choi, Samsung Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe