Surgeons' Mental Distress and Risks After Severe Complications Following Emergency Surgery

February 14, 2024 updated by: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Surgeons' Mental Distress and Risks After Severe Complications Following Emergency Surgery in China: a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Questionnaire

Surgeons experience higher levels of work stress, even under normal circumstances. Many can suffer from substantial levels of mental health issues, especially when faced with severe complications. However, due to a variety of reasons, many surgeons are reluctant to disclose mental health issues or seek psychological help.

Patients in need of emergency surgery are usually characterized by critical conditions and high surgical risks. Emergency surgeons always do not have enough time to clearly explain the ins and outs of the disease to the family members of the patients, only tell the key issues and risks that need to be paid attention to during the operation. The tone of the explanation maybe direct and blunt, which also could cause the incomprehension and dissatisfaction of the patients and their families. Due to the lack of communication, although the patient is in critical condition, the family members always think that the disease should be cured after arriving at the hospital. Therefore, once severe complications occur after the operation, the family members often find it difficult to accept the reality. This is also one of the important reasons for medical disputes in emergency surgery.

In addition to delaying patients' recovery courses, severe complications also place enormous pressure on chief surgeons who performed the operations. Such pressures may bring great risks of psychological distress. Surgeons are also the victims when they encounter severe complications following emergency surgery. Their mental distress should not be minimized. Until now, little has been known about the effects of surgical complications on surgeons. In the current study, based on a large-scale questionnaire survey in China, the investigators aimed to investigate incidences of surgeons' mental distress following severe complications after emergency surgery. The investigators also aimed to identify independent risk factors which could help develop strategies to improve the mental well-being of these surgeons after such incidences.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2500

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population are limited to surgeons who had previously experienced severe complications following radical gastrectomy as chief surgeons.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgeons who experienced severe complications after Emergency Surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other conditions that do not meet the inclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgeons' mental health
Time Frame: July 01, 2023 to June 30, 2026
The clinical features collected in the questionnaire relating to the surgeons' mental distress included: i) feeling burnout, anxiety, or depression; ii) avoiding radical gastrectomy or feeling stress, slowing down the process during radical gastrectomy operations; iii) having physical reactions, including heart pounding, trouble breathing, or sweating while recalling; iv) having urges to quit being a surgeon; v) taking psychiatric medications; and vi) seeking psychological counseling. Meeting any one of the above six clinical features was regarded as having mental distress; Meeting ore or two was defined as mild mental distress, and meeting three or more was defined as severe mental distress.
July 01, 2023 to June 30, 2026

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Zhongshan-HHY-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health

Clinical Trials on Severe complications following emergency surgery

3
Subscribe