Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Using Remimazolam and Sevoflurane in Minimally Invasive AVR

July 29, 2025 updated by: Kim Hee Young, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Using Remimazolam and Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery : A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension, and be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. This study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anesthetic agents can cause hypotension due to reduced cardiac contractility and vasodilation. This can be especially dangerous in patients with severe aortic stenosis, which can lead to even circulatory collapse in extreme cases. Remimazolam is a relatively new anesthetic agent and it is a ultra-short acting benzodiazepine with a context sensitive half time of 7.5 minutes. Remimazolam is known for its hemodynamic stability compared to propofol. Previous studies have also shown that remimazolam can be safely used in patients with severe aortic stenosis and in cardiac anesthesia induction and during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, there is no definite data on comparison of hemodynamic variables between remimazolam based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and conventional propofol induction and sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia. Therefore, this study is designed to compare effects of remimazolam vs. sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gyeongsangnam-do
      • Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea, Republic of, 50612
        • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 19 years old
  • Patients with severe aortic stenosis, undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with known allergy to benzodiazepine, flumazenil, propofol
  • Patients with galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency, glucose-galactose malabsorption
  • Patients with hypersensitivity to Dextran40
  • Patients who have been taking benzodiazepine for long term
  • Patients with whom heart rate assessment is not accurate, such as atrial fibrillation
  • Patients with end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis
  • Patients with history of acute angle glaucoma
  • Patients with valve disease severity of grade III or higher, other than aortic valve
  • Emergency operation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Remimazolam
Induction dose of 6 mg/kg/h of remimazolam with remifentanil TCI 1~4 nanogram/mL are injected together. When patient loses consciousness, rocuronium 0.8 mg/kg is given and endotracheal intubation is performed after confirming that TOF count is less than one. Anesthesia is maintained by using remimazolam dose of 1mg/kg/h~2mg/kg/h with remifentanil to maintain optimal depth of anesthesia, which will checked by Sedline value between 25 to 50.
During induction, patients allocated to the remimazolam group will receive remimazolam 6mg/kg/h with remifentanil TCI 1~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with remimazolam 1-2mg/kg/h combied with remifetanil.
Other Names:
  • Remimazolam besylate, Byfavo Inj., Hana Pharm Col, Ltd., Seoul, Korea
Active Comparator: Propofol/sevoflurane
1% propofol 1-2mg/kg is injected with remifentanil TCI 1~4, and when patient loses consciousness, sevoflurane is started and rocuronium 0.8mg/kg is given. After confirming that TOF count is less than one, intubation is performed and anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil to keep the Sedline value between 25 and 50.
During induction, patients allocated to the P/S group will receive propofol 1% 1-2mg/kg with remifentanil TCI 1~4 nanogram/mL. After patient loses consciousness, anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil.
Other Names:
  • Fresofol 1% TM, Fresenius

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total dose of vasopressors and inotropics used.
Time Frame: Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesia
Total dose of vasopressors and inotropics used during anesthesia will be compared between two groups.
Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hypotension and bradycardia event duration
Time Frame: Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesia
Hypotension and bradycardia event duration will be compared
Start of anesthesia to end of anesthesia
Extubation time
Time Frame: End of anesthesia to extubation
Extubation time between the two groups will be compared
End of anesthesia to extubation
Emergence agitation
Time Frame: Arrival of patient at ICU
Emergence agitation will be compared between the two groups using Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale upon arrival at ICU. The Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale uses a numeric score from 1 (unarousable) to 7 (dangerous agitation)to assess the level of patient sedation and identifies seven levels of sedation and agitation, which range from deep sedation (unarousable) to dangerous agitation.
Arrival of patient at ICU

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hee Young Kim, MD, PhD, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe