Postoperative Sensitivity Following Placement with Different Restorative Materials in Vital Posterior Teeth (GCP)

March 3, 2025 updated by: Sarang Suresh, Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences

Comparison of Postoperative Sensitivity Following Placement with Different Restorative Materials in Vital Posterior Teeth

There is a lack of long-term clinical studies comparing different restorative materials; most of the available studies have only looked at class I cavities or examined post-operative sensitivity in non-caries cervical lesions. The purpose of this study is to measure postoperative sensitivity in clinical settings at 3-month intervals for class 1 and 2 direct posterior restoration

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan
        • Institute of Dentistry, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Either gender Minimum age 18 years, maximum age 40 years. Class I & II Cavity on maxillary and mandibular 1st and 2nd molars. Vital maxillary and mandibular molar teeth that had occlusal contact with antagonist teeth.

Exclusion Criteria:

Irreversible Pulpitis diagnosed clinically and radiographically. Class I & Class II cavity of premolars and third molars Patients taking analgesic prior to treatment. History of allergic reaction to any dental material used in the study. History of parafunctional habits (bruxism and/or clenching) Malocclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tetric N Bond Universal®
Cavities in this group will be restored with Conventional Hybrid Composite Restoration bonded with Etch & Rinse Technique using Tetric N Bond Universal®.
Cavities will be restored with Conventional Hybrid Composite Restoration bonded with Etch & Rinse Tetric - N - Bond (Ivoclar)
Active Comparator: Self Etch Tetric N Bond Universal®
Cavities in this group will be restored with Conventional Hybrid Composite Restoration bonded with Self Etch Technique using Tetric N Bond Universal®.
Cavities will be restored with Conventional Hybrid Composite Restoration bonded with Self Etch Tetric N Bond Universal®
Active Comparator: GC Fuji IX, GC, Japan®
Cavities in this group will be restored with GC Fuji IX, GC, Japan®
Cavities will be restored with GC Fuji IX, GC, Japan®
Active Comparator: Activa TM Bioactive Restorative ®
Cavities in this group will be restored with Activa TM Bioactive Restorative ®
Cavities will be restored with Activa TM Bioactive Restorative ®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post Operative Sensitivity
Time Frame: 3 Months
Sensitivity will be recorded as present when a patient experienced more pain when the cold stimulus is applied on the restored tooth than on the control tooth is assessed using the modified visual analogue scale to any stimulus (occlusal function, cold/hot water, or sweets) every day by the patient until 7 days, then by the clinician on 7 days, 3 months.
3 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Priya Rani, BDS, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Science

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LUMHS/REC/-29

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sensitivity, Tooth

Clinical Trials on Tetric N Bond Universal®

Subscribe