Machine Vision Based MDS-UPDRS III Machine Rating

June 7, 2023 updated by: Ruijin Hospital

Machine Vision Based Machine Rating of MDS-UPDRS III

The Movement Disorders Society (MDS) Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III (MDS-UPDRS III) is the primary assessment method for motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease patients. Currently, movement disorder specialists conduct semi-quantitative scoring, which entails limitations such as subjectivity, weak sensitivity, and a limited number of professional physicians. This study, based on machine vision, establishes gold standard labels according to expert scoring. By using machine learning, we develop a machine rating model and compare the model's performance with gold standard rating and general clinical rating to investigate the accuracy of machine vision-based MDS-UPDRS III machine rating.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

871

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100050
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Center for Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contact:
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Beijing Hospital, Neurology Department
        • Contact:
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350001
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences
        • Contact:
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430022
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Neurology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
        • Contact:
    • Jiangsu
      • Suzhou, Jiangsu, China, 215004
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Neurology and Clinical Research Center of Neurological Disease, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
        • Contact:
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200025
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610044
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

In this study, participants are mainly recruited from the Department of Neurology at Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, as well as from movement disorder clinics at 7 other centers. Participants are enrolled through outpatient assessment and screening. Two specialists in movement disorders independently diagnosed participants as having "Parkinsonism". In cases where there is a diagnostic disagreement, the Movement Disorder Specialist Group at the Department of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital collectively discusses and makes the decision.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meeting the diagnostic criteria for Parkinsonism established by the International Movement Disorder Society: having bradykinesia, and meeting at least one of the two criteria for resting tremor or muscle rigidity
  • 20 to 80 years old
  • Good compliance, voluntarily joining the study, and able to sign an informed consent form or have it signed by a legal representative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 23)
  • Unable to sign written informed consent or unable to complete the trial due to other reasons
  • Other situations in which the researcher deems the participant unsuitable for this study
  • Participation in other clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ACC0 of machine rating vs gold standard rating
Time Frame: 1 day
The accuracy rate when machine rating equals gold standard rating.
1 day
ACC1 of machine rating vs gold standard rating
Time Frame: 1 day
The accuracy rate when machine rating equals the range of gold standard rating plus or minus one.
1 day
Weighted kappa of machine rating vs gold standard rating
Time Frame: 1 day
The weighted kappa when machine rating equals gold standard rating.
1 day
Lin's CCC of machine rating vs gold standard rating
Time Frame: 1 day
The Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient when machine rating equals gold standard rating.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy rate of machine rating vs general clinical rating
Time Frame: 1 day
Comparing the absolute residuals between machine rating and the gold standard rating with the absolute residuals between general clinical raitng and the gold standard rating.
1 day
Accuracy rate of machine facilitated rating vs general clinical rating
Time Frame: 1 day
Comparing the absolute residuals between machine facilitated rating and the gold standard rating with the absolute residuals between general clinical raitng and the gold standard rating.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

June 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinsonian Disorders

Clinical Trials on video recording

Subscribe