SURGX Antimicrobial Gel Versus Povidone-iodine Skin Incision Prep in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

November 14, 2024 updated by: Randall J. Otto, MD, St. Louis University

SURGX Antimicrobial Gel Versus Povidone-iodine Skin Incision Prep for the Prevention of Bacterial Seeding in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Comparing the growth of intra-operative tissue cultures of Cutibacterium Acnes after primary shoulder replacement when using a no-prep control group versus antimicrobial wound gel versus betadine applied to the skin layer after the skin incision has been made. Reducing the bacteria present in the deep tissues at the end of the surgery may prevent infections from developing in the future.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) prosthetic joint infection is a devastating and somewhat unique complication to shoulder arthroplasty. It is a very slow-growing, aerotolerant anaerobic, non-spore forming, gram-positive rod-shaped bacteria that takes up to 2-3 weeks to grow in a lab setting. There have been several studies assessing various agents in the fight to prevent C. acnes prosthetic joint infection. These agents include standard peri-operative measures typically taken when performing shoulder replacement surgery - pre-operative prophylactic antibiotics, pre-operative skin cleanse/wash, topical adjuvants (povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, etc.), and intra-operative antibiotic powders. The overall infection rate of shoulder arthroplasty has been cited to be between 0.9-2.9%, with C. acnes being the most common bacterium in shoulder arthroplasty periprosthetic infections. Morbidity and cost associated with shoulder prosthetic joint infection is extremely high, requiring multiple surgeries and months of treatment to overcome the infection.

One of the main issues with C. acnes is its preferred location within the body, residing within the sebaceous glands of the hair follicles, deep to the epidermis where many preoperative topical preparations to cleanse the skin prior to surgery have little affect. These glands are commonly found around the shoulder and upper back, and lead to acne. C. acnes, along with other common prosthetic joint infection bacteria, quickly create a biofilm which is impenetrable to most antibiotic agents, further stressing the importance of prevention. Recently there have been studies analyzing the effects of Benzoyl Peroxide (BPO) on C. acnes as it relates to shoulder arthroplasty in an attempt to reduce this bacterial burden prior to surgery. There have been promising results with multi-day preparation skin cleansing with benzoyl peroxide. However, there are no studies looking at intra-operative skin incision preparations targeting the region of skin where the C. acnes bacteria resides. In vitro studies show SURGX antimicrobial gel (Next Science, Jacksonville, FL) results in a marked reduction of C. acnes in addition to other common bacteria affecting prosthetic joints. This gel uses citric acid to chelate the metallic bonds of biofilm. The bacteria are then destroyed by a combination of a high osmolarity environment coupled with a surfactant.

The first purpose of the study is to evaluate if a dermal layer preparation will reduce positive cultures of C. acnes after primary shoulder arthroplasty. There will be a control group consisting of no skin preparation. There will be two additional comparative groups. The second purpose of this study is to compare the use of standard povidone-iodine swab versus SURGX antimicrobial gel as an application into the dermal layer after the skin incision has been made with a skin knife to see if there is a reduction in bacterial burden in the superficial and deep tissues at the end of a primary shoulder arthroplasty. Superficial and deep cultures will be obtained at the conclusion of the shoulder replacement surgery. These cultures will be held in the lab for 2 weeks to identify if bacteria is present. The study team's hypothesis is that the SURGX antimicrobial gel will provide a greater reduction in bacterial burden compared to povidone-iodine within the deep tissues after primary shoulder arthroplasty.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Saint Louis University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is planned to undergo elective primary anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is undergoing revision shoulder replacement surgery.
  • Patient has a known allergy to iodine, benzalkonium chloride, or polythylene glycol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No skin incision preparation

All patients will receive standard pre-operative prophylactic antibiotics. Participants will all receive the same preoperative external skin preparation with Hibiclens (chlorhexidine) and ChloraPrep (2% chlorhexidine gluconate / 70% isopropyl alcohol solution) prior to draping. Intra-operative irrigation will be standardized with Irrisept (chlorhexidine gluconate 0.05% in sterile water).

The control group will receive no dermal layer skin preparation. At the time of the surgery, after the skin incision has been made with a skin knife, the dermal layer will not be prepped with an agent.

Active Comparator: Povidone-iodine

At the time of the surgery, after the skin incision has been made, the dermal layer be prepped with povidone-iodine.

Drug: povidone-iodine Dose: swabstick Administration: swab the incision Frequency: once

Applied to skin incision.
Other Names:
  • Betadine
Experimental: SURGX Wound Gel
At the time of the surgery, after the skin incision has been made, the dermal layer be prepped with SURGX Wound Gel. SURGX wound gel is a topical antiseptic gel agent to be used on surgical incisions to prevent bacterial infection.
Applied to skin incision.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of Bacteria Within Shoulder Culture Using Incisional Prep vs. no Prep
Time Frame: Day 14
Each participant had culture swabs at end of surgical case from deep, superficial, and implant locations. Cultures were held in the lab for 2 weeks to evaluate for the presence of bacteria. The number of patients with at least one positive culture were compared among the three study arms.
Day 14
Presence of Bacteria Within Shoulder Culture Using Incisional Prep vs. no Prep
Time Frame: Day 14
Each participant had 5 total culture swabs at end of surgical case from deep (2), superficial (2), and implant (1) locations. Cultures were held in the lab for 2 weeks to evaluate for the presence of bacteria. The number of positive cultures after 2 weeks were compared among the control group and SURGX group.
Day 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of Bacteria Within Shoulder Culture Using SURGX Wound Gel Prep vs. Povidone-iodine Prep
Time Frame: Day 14
Each participant had culture swabs at end of surgical case from deep, superficial, and implant locations. Cultures were held in the lab for 2 weeks to evaluate for the presence of baceria. The number of patients with at least one positive culture were compared among the SURGX and povidone-iodine groups.
Day 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Randall Otto, MD, St. Louis University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 26, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe