Effects of CBT-Based Intervention Among Patients With Liver Cancer

November 21, 2023 updated by: Hua Yin, The Nethersole School of Nursing

Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Based Intervention on Depression, Anxiety, Quality of Life, Immune Indicators, and Survival Among Patients With Liver Cancer

This study investigates the effects of a CBT- based intervention on depression, anxiety, immune function, quality of life, and overall survival. It also explores if the effects of the intervention on immune function and quality of life are mediated through the improvements in depression and anxiety among patients with liver cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the present research project, the investigators have developed a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-based intervention protocol to investigate the impact of this intervention on depression, anxiety, quality of life, immune function, and overall survival in patients diagnosed with liver cancer. Additionally, this research protocol aims to examine the hypothesized mechanisms underlying the effects of the CBT-based intervention on quality of life and immune function. Specifically, we will investigate: 1) whether the effect of the CBT-based intervention on quality of life is mediated by improvements in anxiety and depression, and 2) whether the effect of the CBT-based intervention on immune function is mediated by improvements in anxiety and depression among patients with liver cancer.

A total of 160 participants will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the CBT-based intervention group or an educational group receiving non-psychological interventions. Assessments will be conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the intervention period. Survival data will be collected throughout the follow-up period until the patients' end-of-life.

By examining the effects of the CBT-based intervention on multiple outcomes and exploring the potential mediating mechanisms, this research project aims to contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the intervention's effectiveness and its impact on the well-being of liver cancer patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Zhuhai, Guangdong, China, 519000
        • Zhuhai People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults (aged ≥18);
  2. Diagnosed with liver cancer based on pathological findings or imaging findings in the medical record;
  3. The severity level of depression and anxiety: Depression > 7 using HAD-D, or Anxiety > 7 using HAD-A (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS; HAD-D, Hospital Depression Scale; HAD-A, Hospital Anxiety Scale).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are taking part in another psychological intervention clinical trial or consented to receive another psychotherapy, suffered from aphasia and other communication difficulties will be excluded from the study
  2. Patients with active immunological diseases, such as autoimmune diseases, and inflammatory diseases.
  3. Patients accepting hormone therapy or taking long-term antibiotic drugs.
  4. Patients who lack the basic ability of understanding and expression and are incompetent in giving consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive behavioural therapy-based(CBT-based) intervention group
A specifically designed CBT-based intervention consisting of 8 weekly sessions will be conducted in a group format.

A specifically designed CBT-based intervention consisting of 8 weekly sessions with group format.

Each group will be comprised of 4-10 participants, and each session will last 1.5 hours.

The content of the weekly sessions will be based on Beck's cognitive theory and the cognitive therapy in groups guidelines.

The framework of every session will follow a pre-determined structure.

Active Comparator: Control group
Participants will receive eight health education sessions simultaneously with the CBT-based intervention group.
The educational sessions are consisting of 8 weekly sessions with a group format. These sessions will focus on cancer-related information and care knowledge which will be delivered in daily routine care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression symptoms at baseline
Time Frame: T0(Baseline)
Participants' depression score with the depression subscale of the Hospital depression and Depression Scale (HADS). The HADS depression subscale score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms.
T0(Baseline)
Change in depression symptoms at 3 months
Time Frame: T1(3 months)
Change in participants' depression score with the HADS depression subscale from baseline to 3 months. The HADS depression subscale score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms.
T1(3 months)
Change in depression symptoms at 6 months
Time Frame: T2(6 months)
Change in participants' depression score with the HADS depression subscale from baseline to 6 months. The HADS depression subscale score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms.
T2(6 months)
Change in depression symptoms at 12 months
Time Frame: T3(12 months)
Change in participants' depression score with the HADS depression subscale from baseline to 12 months. The HADS depression subscale score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms.
T3(12 months)
Anxiety symptoms at baseline
Time Frame: T0(Baseline)
Participants' anxiety score with the Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The HADS anxiety subscale score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms.
T0(Baseline)
Change in anxiety symptoms at 3 months
Time Frame: T1(3 months)
Change in participants' anxiety score with the HADS anxiety subscale from baseline to 3 months. The HADS anxiety subscale score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms.
T1(3 months)
Change in anxiety symptoms at 6 months
Time Frame: T2(6 months)
Change in participants' anxiety score with the HADS anxiety subscale from baseline to 6 months. The HADS anxiety subscale score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms.
T2(6 months)
Change in anxiety symptoms at 12 months
Time Frame: T3(12 months)
Change in participants' anxiety score with the HADS anxiety subscale from baseline to 12 months. The HADS anxiety subscale score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms.
T3(12 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life score (The EORTC QLQ-C30) at baseline
Time Frame: T0(Baseline)

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire results.

Scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

T0(Baseline)
Change in Quality of life score (The EORTC QLQ-C30) at 3 months
Time Frame: T1(3 months)

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire results.

Scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

T1(3 months)
Change in Quality of life score (The EORTC QLQ-C30) at 6 months
Time Frame: T2(6 months)

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire results.

Scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

T2(6 months)
Change in Quality of life score (The EORTC QLQ-C30) at 12 months
Time Frame: T3(12 months)

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire results.

Scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

T3(12 months)
Quality of life score (The EORTC QLQ-HCC18) at baseline
Time Frame: T0(Baseline)
The Hepatocellular Carcinoma Module of The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score represents a high level of symptomatology or problems.
T0(Baseline)
Change in Quality of life score (The EORTC QLQ-HCC18) at 3 months
Time Frame: T1(3 months)
The Hepatocellular Carcinoma Module of The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score represents a high level of symptomatology or problems.
T1(3 months)
Change in Quality of life score (The EORTC QLQ-HCC18) at 6 months
Time Frame: T2(6 months)
The Hepatocellular Carcinoma Module of The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score represents a high level of symptomatology or problems.
T2(6 months)
Change in Quality of life score (The EORTC QLQ-HCC18) at 12 months
Time Frame: T3(12 months)
The Hepatocellular Carcinoma Module of The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score represents a high level of symptomatology or problems.
T3(12 months)
Immune variables 1 at baseline
Time Frame: T0(Baseline)
Total lymphocyte count. Collected from daily medical records.
T0(Baseline)
Change in Immune variables 1 at 3 months
Time Frame: T1(3 months)
Total lymphocyte count. Collected from daily medical records.
T1(3 months)
Change in Immune variables 1 at 6 months
Time Frame: T2(6 months)
Total lymphocyte count. Collected from daily medical records.
T2(6 months)
Immune variables 2 at baseline
Time Frame: T0(Baseline)
Level of IFN-γ. Collected from blood sample.
T0(Baseline)
Change in Immune variables 2 at 3 months
Time Frame: T1(3 months)
Level of IFN-γ. Collected from blood sample.
T1(3 months)
Change in Immune variables 2 at 6 months
Time Frame: T2(6 months)
Level of IFN-γ. Collected from blood sample.
T2(6 months)
Immune variables 3 at baseline
Time Frame: T0(Baseline)
IL-2. Collected from blood sample.
T0(Baseline)
Change in Immune variables 3 at 3 months
Time Frame: T1(3 months)
IL-2. Collected from blood sample.
T1(3 months)
Change in Immune variables 3 at 6 months
Time Frame: T2(6 months)
IL-2. Collected from blood sample.
T2(6 months)
Immune variables 4 at baseline
Time Frame: T0(Baseline)
IL-4. Collected from blood sample.
T0(Baseline)
Change in Immune variables 4 at 3 months
Time Frame: T1(3 months)
IL-4. Collected from blood sample.
T1(3 months)
Change in Immune variables 4 at 6 months
Time Frame: T2(6 months)
IL-4. Collected from blood sample.
T2(6 months)
Immune variables 5 at baseline
Time Frame: T0(Baseline)
IL-6. Collected from blood sample.
T0(Baseline)
Change in Immune variables 5 at 3 months
Time Frame: T1(3 months)
IL-6. Collected from blood sample.
T1(3 months)
Change in Immune variables 5 at 6 months
Time Frame: T2(6 months)
IL-6. Collected from blood sample.
T2(6 months)
Overall survival
Time Frame: T3 (12 months) and later till the end of life.
Survival status form follow-up
T3 (12 months) and later till the end of life.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hua Yin, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Cognitive behavioural therapy-based intervention

Subscribe