Investigation The Effect of Conventional Vs. Individualized tDCS Intensity to Achieve Uniform E-Fields

July 24, 2023 updated by: Koen Cuypers

Investigation The Effect of Conventional Vs. Individualized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Intensity to Achieve Uniform E-Fields

Background: Replications of studies employing transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) shows great variations in physiological and behavioral outcomes. The disparity between studies is based on the expectations of getting the same cortical activity changes consistently once the procedures and current parameters have been repeated. Nevertheless, this assumption was inoperative, due to the individualized variations of numerous parameters such as: age, disease type, symptom severity, head geometry, etc.

Objective: Through this clinical trial we aim to reduce the variability of the physiological and behavioral outcomes of tDCS by individualizing the current intensity and to study the neurophysiological and behavioral outcome differences between participants who receive the customized current intensity in comparison to the others who would receive a fixed dose.

Methods: Based on individual patient's structural MRI images, the Electrical field (E-field) distribution can be modeled and the individualized current dose to stimulate a target region can be determined. A group of thirty persons with multiple sclerosis (PWMS) would be pseudo-randomized into three groups receiving all 3 treatments of individualized tDCS, fixed currents (2 mA), and sham tDCS. Baseline and post-intervention assessment of physiological and behavioral outcome measures will be assessed using respectively, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) recruitment curve and a stop-signal task and GO/No-go test.

Significant statement and clinical relevance: Individualizing the patient's tDCS current intensity will result in a better clinical outcome (i.e. more robust physiological and behavioral effects), as compared to a tDCS application that is based on a fixed current.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Right-handed volunteers, assessed by Edinburgh handedness inventory
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision
  • Greater than or equal to 18 years old
  • Relapsing-remitting type of MS (RRMS)
  • Moderate disability EDSS score ≤ 6.5
  • Free of relapsing attack at least a month before recruitment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject recently had a seizure or epilepsy
  • Subject is a habitual smoker;
  • Subject has a history of any major disease that may interfere with the investigations (especially liver and kidney disease, upper limb pathologies, history of significant multiple traumas, or diabetes) or cancer;
  • Subject has any history of a major neurological disorder in addition to MS (including previous severe brain trauma and cognitive impairment) or known cerebral structural abnormalities;
  • Subject has a diagnosed mental disorder (e.g., depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychoses);
  • Subject is currently a user (including ''recreational use'') of any illicit drugs or has a history of drug or alcohol abuse;
  • Subject has significant abnormalities on T1/T2 MRI scan;
  • Subject has a contra-indication for MRI scanning or TMS measurements (see screening forms for MRI and TMS);
  • Subject does not understand the study procedure;
  • Subject is unwilling or unable to perform all study procedures, or is considered unsuitable in any way by the principal investigator;
  • Subject is not able to perform the motor tasks;
  • Subject is (potentially) pregnant (in case of doubt, hCG test will be conducted in female participants); subject is breastfeeding at the time of the study;
  • Subject chronically uses medication, especially sedatives or sleep medication (contraceptives allowed). Other medication that is only taken as needed will be allowed at the investigator's discretion;
  • Using TMS, no (sufficiently stable) MEPs can be evoked at left M1;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Individualized tDCS
Each participant will be screened according to their brain scan, they will receive individualized dose of tDCS currents.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation which involves the use of low intensity currents propagated via the scalp, is widely implemented as both a fundamental and clinical neuroscientific tool. Over the last decades, tDCS showed significant therapeutic promise, as numerous studies revealed that it can result in improved attention and executive functions in patients with neurological disorders, through modification of neuronal excitability.
Active Comparator: Fixed currents tDCS
All of the participant will receive standardized dose of tDCS currents intensity of 2 mA.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation which involves the use of low intensity currents propagated via the scalp, is widely implemented as both a fundamental and clinical neuroscientific tool. Over the last decades, tDCS showed significant therapeutic promise, as numerous studies revealed that it can result in improved attention and executive functions in patients with neurological disorders, through modification of neuronal excitability.
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS
The electrodes will applied to the cortical areas, however none of all of the participant will receive the current dose of tDCS.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation which involves the use of low intensity currents propagated via the scalp, is widely implemented as both a fundamental and clinical neuroscientific tool. Over the last decades, tDCS showed significant therapeutic promise, as numerous studies revealed that it can result in improved attention and executive functions in patients with neurological disorders, through modification of neuronal excitability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline assessment before tDCS session (Pre-intervention), and immediately following tDCS session (Post-intervention).

Changes in cortical excitability will be measured by single and paired TMS pulses.

The final values will be assessed for improvements.

Baseline assessment before tDCS session (Pre-intervention), and immediately following tDCS session (Post-intervention).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline assessment before tDCS session (Pre-intervention), and immediately following tDCS session (Post-intervention).

A cognitive test battery consisting of:

1- Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT); the final score is the correct number of substitutions in 90 seconds, and scores range between 0 and 110, where higher scores indicating better outcome, and the lower scores indicating worse outcome.

Baseline assessment before tDCS session (Pre-intervention), and immediately following tDCS session (Post-intervention).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Koen Cuypers, PhD, UHasselt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

3
Subscribe