Neural Prediction to Enhance Language

June 30, 2026 updated by: Nancy Young, MD, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Neural Prediction to Enhance Language Outcomes in Children With Cochlear Implant

The language outcome of children receiving cochlear implantation to address bilateral sensorineural hearing loss is more variable than that of typical hearing children. The research is focused upon development of neural predictive models based upon brain imaging to forecast language after cochlear implantation on the individual child level. The long-term goal is improving children's language by using predictive models to enable a custom "predict to prescribe" approach to intervene with more effective behavioral therapy for children at risk to develop poorer language. The investigators previously developed models for short term language outcome of English-learning implanted children. The aims of this study are to 1. Develop models able to predict long term outcome for English- learning and Spanish-learning children; and 2. To evaluate whether English-learning children predicted to achieve lower language based on the investigators' previously constructed models can demonstrate significant gains from Parent Implemented Communication Treatment (PICT). PICT is an intensive parent education program about strategies to improve children's communication.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Arm1: Non-treatment Model Building. Up to 700 children will be recruited from 5 cochlear implant programs in the United States. Children will be enrolled and followed for up to four years after implantation. Study information will be obtained from each child's medical record before and after implantation including cause of hearing loss, general health, language and communication history, family history, cochlear implant device and surgery. Audiological information before and after implantation will be collected from routine visits that are part of cochlear implant candidacy evaluation and audiology evaluations after implantation. This includes audiology evaluations after activation of the cochlear implant that take place at around 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and/or 48 months. Pre-surgical MRI done at each participating site as part of routine pre-operative evaluation will also be collected for analysis. If enrolled into the study at Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago before the pre-surgical MRI is done, the parent or guardian will have the option to have their child undergo additional research scans during the pre-surgical MRI.

Parents will be asked to complete baseline and follow-up surveys. The surveys will ask about family demographic and health information, language exposure in the home, therapy and school services, and language and communication ability of the child. Parental surveys will be readministered at about 12-month intervals after the child's device is turned on. In addition, surveys about the child's cognition will be sent to parents after their child has used their implant for one and two years. Surveys will be offered online by a secure link provided during clinical visits, emailed after the visit or sent by MyChart to the parent/guardian for completion at home.

An in-person research-only speech and language evaluation will be done at about one-year intervals after initial implantation during each year the child is enrolled in the study. The evaluation will take less than two hours.

Arm 2: Experimental: Communication Treatment is terminated. Study#372634 (the human subjects study record) to be removed/terminated in ASSIST.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

700

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria (Arm 1):

  1. Children with sensorineural hearing loss who meet clinical criteria for cochlear implantation in both ears who meet the following age criteria at time cochlear implant evaluation begins:

    • Age 5 years and under.
    • English or Spanish as the dominant language.
  2. English or Spanish dominant language in the home.

Inclusion Criteria (Arm 2):

  1. Children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who meet clinical criterial for cochlear implantation
  2. English dominant spoken language by family
  3. Age at implantation of 36 months and younger when treatment begins
  4. Parent or caregiver that is willing to participate who understands spoken English
  5. Child is exposed to spoken language by at least one parent (total communication or auditory/oral) in the home

Exclusion Criteria (Arm 1):

  1. Severe motor and /or cognitive disability that would preclude evaluation of progress
  2. Limited electrode insertion likely to significantly impact development of speech perception
  3. Hearing loss due to bacterial meningitis
  4. Neither English or Spanish as the dominant family language in the home

Exclusion Criteria (Arm 2):

  1. Severe motor and /or cognitive disability that would preclude evaluation of progress
  2. Limited electrode insertion likely to significantly impact development of speech perception
  3. Hearing loss due to bacterial meningitis
  4. Dominant language other than English
  5. Diagnoses or medical conditions expected to impact language development independent of hearing loss
  6. Cochlear nerve deficiency in implanted ears or severe cochlear malformation
  7. Children already having spoken language who score better than 25th percentile on the Words and Sentences portion of the CDI language evaluation.
  8. Child with more than two months CI experience prior to start of treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Non-treatment Model Building
Experimental: Communication Treatment
Terminated
The intervention will be taught by a qualified professional online and/or in-person for about 6 months. Parents will learn strategies to enhance their children's social communication and will receive coaching and feedback.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preschool Language Scales, Fifth Edition (PLS-5)
Time Frame: At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
A standardized measure of auditory comprehension and expressive communication in children. Standard scores are obtained which are then translated to percentiles, and age equivalents. Higher standard scores indicate better performance.
At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
Preschool Language Scales, Fifth Edition (PLS-5)
Time Frame: At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
A standardized measure of auditory comprehension and expressive communication in children. Standard scores are obtained which are then translated to percentiles, and age equivalents. Higher standard scores indicate better performance.
At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
Preschool Language Scales, Fifth Edition (PLS-5)
Time Frame: At 36 months after cochlear implant activation
A standardized measure of auditory comprehension and expressive communication in children. Standard scores are obtained which are then translated to percentiles, and age equivalents. Higher standard scores indicate better performance.
At 36 months after cochlear implant activation
Preschool Language Scales, Fifth Edition (PLS-5)
Time Frame: At 48 months after cochlear implant activation
A standardized measure of auditory comprehension and expressive communication in children. Standard scores are obtained which are then translated to percentiles, and age equivalents. Higher standard scores indicate better performance.
At 48 months after cochlear implant activation
Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition (EOWPVT-4)
Time Frame: At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
An individually administered, norm-referenced assessment of how well a person can name objects, actions, or concepts presented in full-color pictures. Raw scores are obtained which are then translated to standard scores, percentiles, and age equivalents. Both higher standard scores and raw scores indicate better performance.
At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition (EOWPVT-4)
Time Frame: At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
An individually administered, norm-referenced assessment of how well a person can name objects, actions, or concepts presented in full-color pictures. Raw scores are obtained which are then translated to standard scores, percentiles, and age equivalents. Both higher standard scores and raw scores indicate better performance.
At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition (EOWPVT-4)
Time Frame: At 36 months after cochlear implant activation
An individually administered, norm-referenced assessment of how well a person can name objects, actions, or concepts presented in full-color pictures. Raw scores are obtained which are then translated to standard scores, percentiles, and age equivalents. Both higher standard scores and raw scores indicate better performance.
At 36 months after cochlear implant activation
Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition (EOWPVT-4)
Time Frame: At 48 months after cochlear implant activation
An individually administered, norm-referenced assessment of how well a person can name objects, actions, or concepts presented in full-color pictures. Raw scores are obtained which are then translated to standard scores, percentiles, and age equivalents. Both higher standard scores and raw scores indicate better performance.
At 48 months after cochlear implant activation
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI)
Time Frame: At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
A set of online parent report intruments that evaluate children's early speech and langauge development. Standard scores are based on percentiles for age and sex and range from 1 to 99th percentile. Higher standard scores indicate better performance.
At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI)
Time Frame: At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
A set of online parent report intruments that evaluate children's early speech and langauge development. Standard scores are based on percentiles for age and sex and range from 1 to 99th percentile. Higher standard scores indicate better performance.
At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI)
Time Frame: At 36 months after cochlear implant activation
A set of online parent report intruments that evaluate children's early speech and langauge development. Standard scores are based on percentiles for age and sex and range from 1 to 99th percentile. Higher standard scores indicate better performance.
At 36 months after cochlear implant activation
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (CDI)
Time Frame: At 48 months after cochlear implant activation
A set of online parent report intruments that evaluate children's early speech and langauge development. Standard scores are based on percentiles for age and sex and range from 1 to 99th percentile. Higher standard scores indicate better performance.
At 48 months after cochlear implant activation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)
Time Frame: At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
A parent-reported executive function questionnaire that utilizes T-scores to reflect individual's level of executive functioning. Higher T-scores indicate better performance.
At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)
Time Frame: At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
A parent-reported executive function questionnaire that utilizes T-scores to reflect individual's level of executive functioning. Higher T-scores indicate better performance.
At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Preschool Version (BRIEF-P)
Time Frame: At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
A parent-reported executive function questionnaire designed for preschool-aged children that utilizes T-scores to reflect children's level of executive functioning. Higher T-scores indicate better performance.
At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Preschool Version (BRIEF-P)
Time Frame: At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
A parent-reported executive function questionnaire designed for preschool-aged children that utilizes T-scores to reflect children's level of executive functioning. Higher T-scores indicate better performance.
At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
Pediatric Minimum Speech Test Battery (PMSTB)
Time Frame: At 6 months after cochlear implant activation
A set of measures designed to evaluate speech discrimination for infants and word/ sentence recognition for children using hearing technology before entering school. Scores range from 0 to 700. Higher scores indicate better performance.
At 6 months after cochlear implant activation
Pediatric Minimum Speech Test Battery (PMSTB)
Time Frame: At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
A set of measures designed to evaluate speech discrimination for infants and word/ sentence recognition for children using hearing technology before entering school. Scores range from 0 to 700. Higher scores indicate better performance.
At 12 months after cochlear implant activation
Pediatric Minimum Speech Test Battery (PMSTB)
Time Frame: At 18 months after cochlear implant activation
A set of measures designed to evaluate speech discrimination for infants and word/ sentence recognition for children using hearing technology before entering school. Scores range from 0 to 700. Higher scores indicate better performance.
At 18 months after cochlear implant activation
Pediatric Minimum Speech Test Battery (PMSTB)
Time Frame: At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
A set of measures designed to evaluate speech discrimination for infants and word/ sentence recognition for children using hearing technology before entering school. Scores range from 0 to 700. Higher scores indicate better performance.
At 24 months after cochlear implant activation
Pediatric Minimum Speech Test Battery (PMSTB)
Time Frame: At 36 months after cochlear implant activation
A set of measures designed to evaluate speech discrimination for infants and word/ sentence recognition for children using hearing technology before entering school. Scores range from 0 to 700. Higher scores indicate better performance.
At 36 months after cochlear implant activation
Pediatric Minimum Speech Test Battery (PMSTB)
Time Frame: At 48 months after cochlear implant activation
A set of measures designed to evaluate speech discrimination for infants and word/ sentence recognition for children using hearing technology before entering school. Scores range from 0 to 700. Higher scores indicate better performance.
At 48 months after cochlear implant activation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 23, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 23, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe