Impact of Emotional Reactivity on Dysfunctional Decision-Making in NSSI Adolescents

April 9, 2024 updated by: Benjamin Becker, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Effects of Emotional Reactivity on Decision-Making in Adolescents With Nonsuicidal Self-Injury

Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is defined as direct, intentional physical injury without suicidal intention. Studies revealed that dysfunctional interpersonal relationships and reward-related decision-making may play crucial roles in this maladaptive behavior, especially in adolescents. These interpersonal decision contexts are characterized by constant updating of expectations of rewards and the actual received rewards as well as the associated emotional reactions. These processes have recently been computationally formalized as prediction errors (PE), specifically reward PEs, valence PEs, and arousal PEs (Heffner et al., 2021; Nat Hum Behav). In the current study, the investigators aim to investigate whether these PEs make discernible contributions to social decisions in the context of unfair experiences among adolescents with NSSI and matched healthy control adolescents (HC). Specifically the investigators hypothesized that: 1) reward and emotional PEs show significant predictions of punishment decisions in both groups, 2) however, compared to HC adolescents, the NSSI group will exhibit selective dysfunctions in emotional but not reward PEs leading to punish a norm proposer who provided unfair offers.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Sichuan Provincial Center for Mental Health, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Treatment-seeking NSSI individuals will be recruited from local hospitals and HC from the community.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 15-18 years
  • right-handed
  • normal or corrected normal visual acuity
  • meet the proposed DSM-5 frequency criteria (e.g., ≥5 days of NSSI behaviors in the past year)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of borderline personality disorder, major depressive disorder, other
  • psychiatric disorders, etc.
  • high suicidal risk
  • recent use of medications that can affect neural activity
  • have received or are receiving Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) other treatment for emotional problems within the past 6 months
  • have a contraindication to MRI scanning (e.g., metal implants, claustrophobia or other conditions that make them inappropriate for MRI scanning)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
NSSI
HC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reward prediction errors (PEs)
Time Frame: About 20 minutes
Reward PEs will be calculated by the differences between the experienced (when be offered) reward and predicted (before the offer) reward.
About 20 minutes
Valence prediction errors (PEs)
Time Frame: About 20 minutes
Valence PEs will be calculated by the differences between the experienced emotional valence and predicted emotional valence.
About 20 minutes
Arousal prediction errors (PEs)
Time Frame: About 20 minutes
Arousal PEs will be calculated by the differences between the experienced emotional arousal and predicted emotional arousal.
About 20 minutes
The prediction of PEs of punishment decisions
Time Frame: About 20 minutes
All PEs and groups (NSSI, HC) will be used in a regression model to examined whether there is any alteration in the NSSI group when PEs are predicted to punishment (reject) decisions.
About 20 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BAM_lab_NSSI_04

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nonsuicidal Self Injury

Subscribe