Adaptation of Individual Dialectical Behavior Therapy Intervention for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders

May 27, 2026 updated by: Shen-Ing,Liu, Mackay Memorial Hospital

Adaptation of Individual Dialectical Behavior Therapy Intervention for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Two Medical Centers: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Anxiety and depressive disorders, referred to as emotional disorders, have high rates of prevalence, recurrence, and functional impairment. Transdiagnostic psychotherapy targeting shared features of these disorders has recently emerged. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders is a promising approach, as results of preliminary studies for use in a broad range of mental disorders are encouraging. Since there is a lack of research on transdiagnostic psychotherapy in Taiwan, the investigators thus propose this 3-year randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a modified DBT for the treatment of transdiagnostic emotional disorders and to further evaluate whether the efficacy of modified DBT differs in the specific emotional disorders. The investigators expect that patients with emotional disorders receiving modified DBT are more likely to improve clinical outcomes, functioning, and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Anxiety and depressive disorders, referred to as emotional disorders, have high rates of prevalence, recurrence, and functional impairment. Transdiagnostic psychotherapy targeting shared features of these disorders has recently emerged. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders is a promising approach, as results of preliminary studies for use in a broad range of mental disorders are encouraging. Since there is a lack of research on transdiagnostic psychotherapy in Taiwan, the investigators thus propose this 3-year randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a modified DBT for the treatment of transdiagnostic emotional disorders and to further evaluate whether the efficacy of modified DBT differs in the specific emotional disorders. This 3-year intervention trial has a randomized, controlled, two-center, and single-blinded design with two parallel groups. The trial will be conducted in the psychiatry departments of two medical centers, employing identical protocols. Participants will be recruited and randomly allocated 1:1 to one of two study arms. The modified DBT protocol in an individual therapy format consists of 15 weekly individual sessions, each lasting 50 minutes. A minimum of 250 participants will be included based on sample size estimation. Assessments will take place before the start of the trial, at the end of the trial, and at a 3-month follow-up. Primary outcomes will be the severity of depression and anxiety, rated by blind assessors. Secondary outcomes include disorder-specific symptoms, disorder severity, functional impairment, quality of life, and emotion regulation biases. The investigators will also examine the treatment mechanisms and treatment processes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Hui-Chun Huang, Ph.D
  • Phone Number: 3055 886-2-28094661
  • Email: aihch@mmh.org.tw

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Recruiting
        • Mackay Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Mandarin Chinese-language proficiency sufficient to complete the study questionnaire
  2. A current diagnosis of depressive or anxiety disorder as diagnosed from a SCAN interview

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Intellectual disability
  2. Substance use disorder in the past three months
  3. Bipolar disorder
  4. Psychotic disorder
  5. Organic brain disorder
  6. Acute suicidality or a history of frequent or recent suicide attempts
  7. Recent (past six weeks) change in psychiatric medication or unwillingness to maintain a stable dosage of medication during study participation
  8. Had received five or more sessions of CBT in the past five years or was unwilling to stop concurrent psychotherapy for an emotional disorder
  9. Any mental or physical condition requiring hospital admission
  10. Another medical condition likely to prevent participation in the study

As we also aim for a naturalistic setting, we do not exclude patients who undergo a medication change during the trial if this is judged necessary or clinically important by the treating clinician. Instead, we include a question about this in the questionnaire to the referring/treating clinician.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Treatment-as-usual (TAU) is a naturalistic treatment condition as delivered in current daily practice by psychiatrists in the medical services in Taiwan. TAU typically includes prescription and monitoring of antidepressant and/or anxiolytic medication, psychological treatment (this may include empathic listening and/or supportive counselling, psychoeducation, etc), or a combination of both. Patients in the TAU condition already receiving any of the aforementioned treatments are informed they will continue to receive as usual the services received before enrollment in the study.
Experimental: Transdiagnostic Adapted DBT plus TAU
The modified DBT protocol, developed by the principal investigator and co-investigators, which will be offered in an individual therapy format. It consists of 15 weekly individual sessions, each lasting 50-60 minutes. It is made based on the manual (Linehan 2015), retaining the essence of DBT (Linehan 1993), and remain dialectically focused. Each session focuses on specific skills within that content of modules.
The modified DBT protocol, developed by the principal investigator and co-investigators, will be offered in an individual therapy format. It consists of 15 weekly individual sessions, each lasting 50-60 minutes. It is made based on the manual, retaining the essence of DBT and remaining dialectically focused. Each session focuses on specific skills within the context of modules.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of total score of Hamilton Depression Scale-17 item (HAMD-17)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Hamilton Depression Scale-17 item is an interview-based instrument for rating the overall levels of severity of the symptoms of depression and the response to treatment. Each item is rated from 0 to 4 or 0 to 2; the scores correspond to increases in severity. Total scores range from 0 to 52.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
HAM-A comprises 14 items with each item being divided into five grades, based on a scale of 0 to 4, with a total score range of 0-56, where <17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
CGI-S (severity): the current condition of the patient on a scale of 1-7 (1 being normal, and 7 being among the most severely ill patients). CGI-I (improvement): the degree of improvement, as perceived by the clinician, since the start of treatment of a scale of 1-7, 1 being very much improved, and 7 being very much worse.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of total score of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
DASS-21 is a self-report measure of depression, anxiety and stress. Each seven-item scale has four response options ranging from 0 (do not apply to me at all) to 3 (apply to me much, or most of the time). Higher scores on each scale indicate higher depression, anxiety, and distress.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
PHQ-9 is a nine-item self-rated questionnaire to measure the severity of depressive symptoms corresponding to the DSM-V criteria of MDD. Each item of the PHQ-9 requires a response on a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (nearly everyday), for a total score ranging from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating increased likelihood for major depressive disorder.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 items (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
GAD-7 is a seven-item self-rated questionnaire to assess the severity of generalized anxiety disorder according to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale (0-3) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety severity.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of Panic Disorder Severity Scale- Self Rating (PDSS-SR)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
PDSS-SR is a self-reported instrument to rate the overall severity of panic disorder. It consists of 7 items coded on a 5-point ordinal scale (0-4), with higher scores indicating a more severe panic attack.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
PSWQ has been widely used as a self-report measure of worry and GAD in most treatment outcome studies of GAD. It has 16 items and each item is rated on a scale from 1 ('not at all typical of me') to 5 ('very typical of me'). Total score indicate greater levels of pathological worry.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of Short Form Social Interaction Anxiety (SIAS)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) is companion measures developed for social anxiety. It is among the most commonly used tool for assessing social anxiety and the outcome of psychosocial therapy. Short-form SIAS is the self-report scale with items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale with values ranging from 0 "Not at all characteristic or true of me" to 4 "Extremely characteristic or true of me". Higher scores indicate more severe social anxiety.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of Short Form Social Phobia Scale (SPS)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
The Social Phobia Scale (SPS) is companion measures developed for social anxiety. It is among the most commonly used tool for assessing social anxiety and the outcome of psychosocial therapy. Short-form SPS is the self-report scale with items rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale with values ranging from 0 "Not at all characteristic or true of me" to 4 "Extremely characteristic or true of me". Higher scores indicate more severe social anxiety.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale (DERS)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
DERS including 36 items which assess difficulties regulating emotion across six domains, will be used to assess emotional dysregulation. Items are rated on a scale of 1 ("almost never ") to 5 ("almost always"). Higher scores indicate more difficulty in emotion regulation.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Short Form (PANAS-SF)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
The 10-item I-PANAS-SF includes five items measuring positive affect (PA) and five items measuring negative affect (NA). Responses were provided on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). The higher scores on both PA and NA items indicate the tendency to experience a positive and negative mood.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q SF)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
It evaluates overall enjoyment and satisfaction with physical health, mood, work, household and leisure activities, social and family relationships, daily functioning, sexual life, economic status, overall well-being, and medications. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ('not at all or never' to 'frequently or all the time'), with higher scores indicating better enjoyment and satisfaction with life.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
WSAS was developed to measure the functional impairment resulting from a health problem. Each item is rated on a 9-point Likert scale from 0 (no impairment) to 8 (very severe impaired). Total scores range from 0 to 40; scores of <10 indicate a subclinical condition, 10 to 20 significant functional impairment but less severe clinical symptomatology, and ≥20 moderately severe psychopathology.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of skills subscale (DSS) of the DBT Ways of Coping Checklist (DBT-WCCL)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
DBT Skills Subscale (DSS; 38 items), which assesses adaptive coping responses. Participants rate how often they have used each strategy in the past month using a 4-point Likert-type scale from 0 (never used) to 3 (regularly used).Higher scores indicate more frequent use of these skills.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Change of total score of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
The FFMQ measures five aspects of mindfulness: observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging of internal experience, and nonreactivity to internal experience.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of diagnosis of Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), a semi-structured clinical interview with high reliability, is used to assess Axis I disorders. Diagnoses are assigned a clinical severity rating with a score of 0 (no symptoms attaining clinically significant severity) to 4 (severe interfering or disturbing in daily activity) as the clinical threshold for diagnostic criteria.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
List of threatening experiences (LTE)
Time Frame: Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
The LTE questionnaire consists of 12 questions with dichotomous responses (i.e., yes/no) regarding the occurrence of 12 prevalent major stressful events.
Pretreatment (0 weeks), Posttreatment (20 weeks), 12-week follow-up (32 weeks)
Treatment History Interview -B (THI-B)
Time Frame: Posttreatment (20 weeks)
The THI-B is used to assess patients' experiences with the psychological treatments they received during the study.
Posttreatment (20 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shen-Ing Liu, Ph.D, Mackay Memorial Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT)

Subscribe