Mechanical Ileus in the Era of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

August 13, 2023 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Changing Patterns and Surgical Outcomes for Mechanical Ileus in the Era of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

The present study was to investigate if the incidence, patterns and surgical outcomes of mechanical ileus have changed in the era of minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Mechanical ileus, generally caused by post-operative bowel adhesion, represented 12-16% of emergency surgical admissions and 20% of emergency surgical procedures. Opening the peritoneal cavity, in whatever type of surgery, leads to the formation of potentially obstructive structures (adhesions or bands) in almost 95% of patients. The adhesion resulted from the irritation of the peritoneum caused by surgical trauma or intra-abdominal infection. Bowel adhesions can lead to clinical manifestations within a few weeks or even several years after the surgery. It has been reported that traditional open surgery (TOS) for colorectal cancer were associated with a particularly higher risk of adhesion formation and related complications. Within two years after colorectal surgery, 14.3% of the patients will suffer from small bowel obstruction, and 2.6% will require a surgical intervention for the treatment of this obstruction, and this incidence is even higher after rectal surgery. Adhesive ileus has been a clinical conundrum. Overall, nearly one-fifth of patients needed re-admission for a recurrent disease, even they had been successfully treated by surgical, or non-surgical methods during the index admission.

During the last decade, minimally invasive surgery (MIS), either via laparoscopic or robotic approach, has become the standard procedures for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Theoretically, MIS is associated with a much lower rate of postoperative formation of adhesions than TOB, since adhesion formation represents a stepwise failure of peritoneal tissue repair mechanisms, which can be prevented by the clean dissection, minimal blood loss and/or less-environmental exposure of the bowel inherent in MIS. Some researchers supported this concept by showing MIS colorectal surgery is associated with fewer adhesion-related admissions than open surgery. However, most reported case series were retrospective uncontrolled studies and were liable to some uncertainty; even in some rare randomized controlled trials, the conclusions were contradictory. Moreover, adhesive ileus is just one variant of mechanical ileus; some researchers have pointed out the MIS can paradoxically create some specific types of mechanical ileus, such as internal or external herniation of small intestine, or bowel twisting over the anastomotic site, and so on. Therefore, it remains unclear whether MIS colorectal resection can reduce the incidence of the mechanical ileus and improve the long-term bowel function, as compared with the TOS.

Considering the aforementioned reasons, we conducted the present study to investigate if the incidence, patterns and the treatment outcomes of post-operative mechanical ileus changed in the era of MIS for colorectal cancer.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1544

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients who diagnosed as colorectal cancer and underwent curative intent surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients whose primary colorectal cancers were resected in the fashion of curative and elective surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who underwent palliative or emergency surgery to treat their primary colorectal cancer;
  • patients encountered anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal abscess or the other surgical complications requiring an additional abdominopelvic surgical or non-surgical procedures to treat the complications;
  • simultaneously underwent some other abdominal or pelvic surgical procedures before or after the primary colorectal surgery, e.g., reverse Hartmann's procedure or closure of the temporary colostoma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS)
The patients underwent minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Minimally invasive surgery includes laparoscopic surgery or robotic surgery for the treatment of colorectal surgery.
Traditional open surgery (TOS)
The patients underwent traditional open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Onset time
Time Frame: Follow up period about five years with a median of 38.5 months.
Patients with mechanical ileus were stratified as acute, early, intermediate, and late onset, according to whether the mechanical ileus occurred within 3 months, 3-12 months, 1-2 years, or more than 2 years after the primary surgery for colorectal cancer, respectively.
Follow up period about five years with a median of 38.5 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The pattern of adhesion
Time Frame: Follow up period about five years with a median of 38.5 months.
The pattern of adhesion may be recorded as follows: bands (>1 cm long and <1 cm diameter); simple adhesions (<1 cm long and >1 cm diameter) or matted adhesion (dense, multiple, and tangled)
Follow up period about five years with a median of 38.5 months.
The surgery of adhesive ileus
Time Frame: Follow up period about five years with a median of 38.5 months.
The surgery for treating ileus may be recorded as follows: 1) band section; 2) lysis of simple adhesion; 3) lysis of matted adhesion; 4) extensive adhesiolysis, sutured or not serosal defect or sutured accidental enterotomies; or 5) even the segmental bowel resection in addition to whatever the previously mentioned procedures.
Follow up period about five years with a median of 38.5 months.
Blood loss
Time Frame: About 3-4 hours
The intraoperative blood loss was recorded in mL.
About 3-4 hours
Operation time
Time Frame: About 3-4 hours
The operation time was recorded in minutes.
About 3-4 hours
Surgical complication
Time Frame: Within 30 days
The Clavien-Dindo classification system was used to score the severity of surgical complications. The Clavien-Dindo Classification consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V). The higher the grade, the severer the complication.
Within 30 days
Hospitalization
Time Frame: About 7-10 days
The length of hospital stay was calculated from the date of surgery for mechanical ileus to the day of discharge from the hospital.
About 7-10 days
Re-admission
Time Frame: Within 30 days
The patient needs to be readmitted to hospital due to index surgery.
Within 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jin-Tung LIANG, National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 13, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe