Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerves Block Through Perichondrial Approach: a New Strategy With a Wide Range of Utilization in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgeries.

September 9, 2023 updated by: Alexandria University
The current study was to assess the analgesic effects of the modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) block in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgeries.The primary goal was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of M-TAPA block accomplished prior to surgery in patients undergoing Laparoscopic gynecological surgeries

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All patients were thoroughly assessed preoperatively by history evaluation as regards current medical condition and drug therapy, careful clinical examination and laboratory evaluations (complete blood picture, liver function and renal function tests). Explanation of the anaesthesia method was done to all patients and they were instructed wisely on how to utilize the 10 cm linear visual Analogue scale (VAS), with (0) denoting pain free state, whereas (10) stands for the worst intractable pain [9]. Fifteen minutes before induction, all patients were premedicated with i.v. midazolam 0.03 mg kg-1 In the operating room, an i.v. cannula was placed and secured, then standard monitoring including (pulse oximetry, ECG, non- invasive blood pressure and end tidal carbon dioxide) were applied to each patient using multichannel (Datex ohmeda S/5, Germany) monitor. Anaesthesia was induced with lidocaine (1mg/kg) followed by (1.5 - 2 mg/kg) propofol -till cessation of verbal contact- and (1-1.5 μg/kg) fentanyl. Endotracheal intubation was accomplished with rocuronium (1mg/kg) and a suitable sized tube. Anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (1-2 %) with (50 %) oxygen in air. Controlled mechanical ventilation was provided to maintain ETCO2 between (33-35 mmHg) and an oxygen saturation of 98 %.

Patients will be randomly assigned- using closed envelope technique- into 2 groups (30 patient) each:

Group (M): The M-TAPA block will be combined with general anaesthesia. Group (C): (control group) conventional general anaesthesia receiving multimodal analgesia.

In group (M), after the induction of anaesthesia and with the patient in the supine position, the block was performed before starting of the surgical procedure as described by Tulgar et al. [8]. After surgical skin disinfection with 10 % povidone-iodine, it was covered with sterile surgical fenestrated drapes. A high frequency (6-12 MHz) US linear probe (Fujifilm Sonosite, Tokyo, Japan) covered with a sterile cover was placed in the sagittal plane on the 10 th costal margin in the midline. The probe was then angulated deeply to visualize the lower surface of the costal cartilage. Via in plane technique, a 21 gauge Tuohy needle (Stimuplex B-Braun Medical, Melsungen, Germany) was inserted cranially between the lower fascia of the costal cartilage and upper fascia of the transversus abdominis muscle by moving the needle tip towards the posterior aspect of the 10 th costal cartilage with caution not to cross the cranial edge of the 10th costal cartilage and 20 mL of bupivacaine (0.25 %) was injected bilaterally, in the midclavicular line.

In group (C), ketorolac 0.75 mg/kg and paracetamol 10 mg/kg were administered intravenously before surgical stimulus.

Inadequate analgesia expressed in the form of elevated blood pressure or accelerated heart rate 20 % above baseline value was managed by administration of 0.5 (μg/kg) fentanyl bolus as a rescue analgesia. Perioperative hypothermia was managed by warming of i.v fluids and forced air warming to exposed areas. Precise fluid replacement was provided to all subjects according to the standard guidelines applied during anaesthesia.

At the end of surgery, sevoflurane vaporizer was shut off followed by administration of 100 % oxygen. Muscle relaxant was reversed with neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg and atropine 0.02 mg/kg slowly i.v, after oropharyngeal secretions were suctioned. The tube was removed after ensuring that the patients regained consciousness, breathed spontaneously and respond to verbal command. IV ondansetron (8) mg was given to all patients to guard against postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Patients were transferred to the PACU, where monitoring of heart rate, arterial blood pressure, respiration, and temperature were done by recovery nurses unaware to the study design to avoid bias. Postoperative analgesia was administrated with paracetamol i.v. 1 gm/8 hr throughout the first 24 hours postoperatively and standardized intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with morphine (0.5 mg/mL, 2-mg bolus, lock-out period 10 mins, and 4 hrs limit of 20 mg) based on reaching the score of ≥ (4) VAS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 21615
        • Alexandria University Faculty of Medicin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult female patients
  • aged 20-65 years,
  • normal coagulation profile,
  • scheduled for ambulatory laparoscopic gynecological surgeries under general anaesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal,
  • skin infection at the site of the needle puncture
  • known allergies to any of the study medications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group (M)

The M-TAPA block will be combined with general anaesthesia.

:

A high frequency (6-12 MHz) US linear probe was placed in the sagittal plane on the 10 th costal margin in the midline. The probe was then angulated deeply to visualize the lower surface of the costal cartilage. Via in plane technique, a 21 gauge Tuohy needle was inserted cranially between the lower fascia of the costal cartilage and upper fascia of the transversus abdominis muscle by moving the needle tip towards the posterior aspect of the 10 th costal cartilage and 20 mL bupivacaine (0.25 %) was injected.
Placebo Comparator: Group (C)
(control group) conventional general anaesthesia receiving multimodal analgesia.
conventional general anaesthesia receiving multimodal analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total dose of fentanyl consumption
Time Frame: after 1 hour postoperative
analgesic efficacy of M-TAPA block
after 1 hour postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative morphine given (mg) in the first 24 hrs
Time Frame: after 24 hours postoperatively
analgesic efficacyof M-TAPA block
after 24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 2, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 7, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on The M-TAPA block

3
Subscribe