Frequency vs Error Augmentation Training in Acute Physical Therapy Post Stroke (FEAT)

January 29, 2024 updated by: Christine Holmstedt

Impact of Intense Physical Therapy on Functional Mobility Outcomes in the Acute Stroke Population - Phase II

The Department of Physical Therapy in conjunction with the Comprehensive Stroke Center at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) seeks support for developing an evidence-based approach for the mobilization of patients within the first 24 hours of admission for an acute stroke and for increasing the frequency and intensity of acute PT services while inpatient. This evidence will prepare physical therapists and guide practice in the delivery of acute stroke mobilization in the hospital setting to optimize length of stay, disposition planning, and enhance long term recovery outcomes.

This research hopes to challenge the clinical paradigm regarding the possibility of decreased functional outcomes with early mobilization post stroke. The investigators acknowledge that acute stroke patients may not be able to tolerate an extensive early mobility program but may benefit from shorter more frequent sessions of therapy early in their recovery. Throughout the literature, there are clinical practice guidelines for both the inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient therapy sectors and post stroke recovery. Little is known about the contribution of therapy services in the acute hospital setting and therapy's impact on long term functional gains. The goal of this project is to determine the appropriate dosage of post stroke mobility in the acute care hospital setting.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

The objective is to determine if changing one component of the overall mobility dosage, adjusting frequency or intensity, will improve patient outcomes. Phase I of this study, performed at MUSC from June 2021-June 2022, demonstrated improved functional mobility outcomes at hospital discharge for patients who received a combination of both increased frequency and intensity of PT services compared to the standard of care approach. Phase II aims to determine if these promising results can be attributed to increased frequency, increased intensity, or a combination of frequent and intense PT sessions. The proposed research will be a multidisciplinary collaborative effort from the Department of Neurology and the Department of Physical Therapy to investigate the best-practice for mobilization in the acute hospital phase of stroke. . Phase II aims to evaluate whether the dosage of increased frequency or increased intensity of Physical Therapy services led to the promising outcomes and functional improvements which the first study demonstrated.

Investigators propose to enroll 168 individuals with acute stroke admitted to MUSC and randomize them into increased frequency, increased intensity, increased frequency and intensity combined and usual care PT treatment groups. This study will be designed as a randomized control trial. Patients who agree to participate, will be assigned (at random) to either a treatment arm which will receive either more frequent therapy services, more intense therapy services (increased intensity by incorporating error augmentation training), a combination of frequent and intense therapy services (frequent bouts of error augmentation training) or to the control group (treatment as usual) which will receive the standard amount of therapy services currently provided in the hospital setting (~3-5 times per week). By studying the balance, walking and success of patients in the treatment groups compared with the standard of care group, the investigators hope to better understand the contribution of intense PT services, frequency PT services, or a combination of intense and frequent PT services on a patient's independence post stroke. Investigators know from phase I of this study that patients provided with a combination of increased frequency and intensity of PT services demonstrated significant functional improvements (measured by PASS and AMPAC) at time of hospital discharge and a decreased length of hospital stay when compared to the standard of care PT group. Phase II will help investigators to determine if these promising results can be best attributed to the intensity and error augmentation training portion of PT services, to the frequency of PT services, or to a combination of both frequent and intense PT services post stroke in the acute hospital setting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

168

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
        • Contact:
          • Christine Holmstedt, DO

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute stroke
  • NIHSS score of 2-18 with motor involvement
  • Age 18-80
  • Medical stability for increased therapy services, determined by Stroke Service NP (no large fluctuations or instability for vitals, BP, mental status or seizure like activity) Ability to provide informed consent (alert and oriented x 4 and able to follow commands)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical instability or cerebral perfusion dependence, requiring bed rest
  • Pregnancy (noted in chart)
  • Inmates (noted in chart or by guards present at bedside)
  • Known current COVID-19 infection (PCR positive labs)
  • Dialysis (noted in chart & performed while inpatient)
  • External Carotid Artery Stenting Procedure
  • Hemorrhagic Stroke

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of Care PT
Standard of care PT services to included 3 to 5 therapy sessions per week, each session averaging between 20 to 50 minutes, delivered throughout the hospitalization. No specific instructions will be given to therapists providing standard of care PT, except that they cannot implement error augmentation training. Generally, standard of care PT during the initial hospitalization following acute stroke is provided with targeted patient-specific goals and typically primarily focuses on mobility and gait training. Most sessions are geared toward bed mobility, transfers and gait training with therapeutic exercises provided to target any muscle weakness identified.
Experimental: Frequent PT services
This group will receive physical therapy services twice a day Monday through Friday and daily Saturday and Sunday. Most sessions are geared toward bed mobility, transfers and gait training with therapeutic exercises provided to target any muscle weakness identified.
Physical therapy services twice a day Monday through Friday and daily Saturday and Sunday. Most sessions are geared toward bed mobility, transfers and gait training with therapeutic exercises provided to target any muscle weakness identified.
Experimental: Error Augmentation Training
Will receive error augmentation training 3-5x/wk while inpatient Standard of care PT with the addition of error augmentation principles (making hard tasks harder and increasing difficulty of tasks with added resistance to already weakened muscles) to address at least 2 stroke deficits or limitations.
Will receive error augmentation training 3-5x/wk while inpatient Standard of care PT with the addition of error augmentation principles (making hard tasks harder and increasing difficulty of tasks with added resistance to already weakened muscles) to address at least 2 stroke deficits or limitations.
Other Names:
  • Error Augmentation Training
Experimental: Frequent Intense PT
This group will receive therapy services twice per day Monday through Friday and daily Saturday and Sunday, with implementation of error augmentation training each session. This includes standard of care PT with the addition of error augmentation principles (making hard tasks harder and increasing difficulty of tasks with added resistance to already weakened muscles) to address at least 2 stroke deficits or limitations.
Physical therapy services twice a day Monday through Friday and daily Saturday and Sunday. Most sessions are geared toward bed mobility, transfers and gait training with therapeutic exercises provided to target any muscle weakness identified.
Will receive error augmentation training 3-5x/wk while inpatient Standard of care PT with the addition of error augmentation principles (making hard tasks harder and increasing difficulty of tasks with added resistance to already weakened muscles) to address at least 2 stroke deficits or limitations.
Other Names:
  • Error Augmentation Training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Postural Assessment Stroke Scale (PASS)
Time Frame: From date of PT evaluation up until 90 day stroke follow up post hospital discharge
The scale measures 12 items of balance in sitting, lying and standing with increasing amounts of difficulty. It consists of a 4 point scale, measured from 0 to 3 with scores that range from 0-36. Patients with a lower score have a more severe impairment, and patients with a higher score have a less severe impairment.
From date of PT evaluation up until 90 day stroke follow up post hospital discharge
Change in Activity measure for post acute care (AM-PAC)
Time Frame: From date of PT evaluation up until 90 day stroke follow up post hospital discharge
The scale measures basic mobility in the hospital setting including moving around in bed, getting out of bed, sitting and standing, moving from a bed to a chair, walking, and going up and down stairs. It consists of a 4 point scale measured from 1 to 4 with scores that range from 6 to 24. Patients with a lower score have a more severe impairment, and patients with a higher score have a less severe impairment.
From date of PT evaluation up until 90 day stroke follow up post hospital discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time Frame: From date of PT evaluation up until 90 day stroke follow up post hospital discharge
The scale is a questionnaire that asks patients about their ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL's) taking into account their physical, mental, and speech performance. On admission the questionnaire focuses on their ability to perform ADL's prior to their stroke. At discharge and at 90 day follow up the questionnaire focuses on their ability to perform ADL's at that time point. It is scored from 0 to 5. Patients with a lower score have a less severe impairment, and patients with a higher score have a more severe impairment.
From date of PT evaluation up until 90 day stroke follow up post hospital discharge
Change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS)
Time Frame: From date of PT evaluation up until 90 day stroke follow up post hospital discharge
The scale measures the severity of symptoms associated with patient's stroke. It assesses the severity of impairments related to stroke. The impairments are graded on a 3-4 point scale with scores that range from 0-42. Patients with a higher score have a more severe impairment, and patients with a lower score have a less severe impairment.
From date of PT evaluation up until 90 day stroke follow up post hospital discharge
Length of Stay
Time Frame: From day of hospital admission to day of hospital discharge, measured in days; up to 90 days.
Average hospitalization (measured in days)
From day of hospital admission to day of hospital discharge, measured in days; up to 90 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Christine Holmstedt, Medical University of South Caroline

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 20, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Frequent PT

3
Subscribe