Does Social Media Impact Adolescent Mental Health?

July 6, 2026 updated by: Georgetown University

Causal Effects of Exposure to Social Media on Adolescent Mental Health

The mental health of adolescents in the United States has seen a steep decline, roughly coinciding with the increasing popularity of social media and smartphones. But does social media have a causal impact on the mental health of adolescents or are concerns about the effect of social media on kids a form of public hysteria? In this study, the investigators will conduct the first field experiment in 10-14-year-olds to examine whether, how, and for whom social media harms mental health.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20057

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. is an adolescent who is between the ages of 10 and 14;
  2. is an adolescent whose parents have decided to buy them their first smartphone;
  3. is an adolescent both of whose parents/guardians consent for them to be in the study;
  4. is an adolescent who assents to be in the study; 5) is an adolescent who speaks and reads English sufficiently to complete surveys and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. is an adolescent who has severe developmental problems (e.g., autism, severe language delay);
  2. is an adolescent who is currently or has ever been diagnosed with severe or moderately severe mental illness;
  3. is an adolescent who is currently or has ever experienced suicidal ideation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Naturalistic Social Media
In this control condition, participants will have no study-imposed restrictions on social media use.
Experimental: Restricted Social Media
Participants will have social media apps on their phones blocked for three months.
Participants (N = 500) will be randomly assigned to either have no study-imposed restrictions on social media use (naturalistic social media condition) or have no access to social media apps on their phones (restricted social media condition). This manipulation will last three months, after which both groups will have no study-imposed restrictions on social media for three more months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25): Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, three months, and six months
The average score varies between 0 and 4, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline, three months, and six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25): Depression Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, three months, and six months
The average score varies between 0 and 4, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline, three months, and six months
Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25): Anxiety Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, three months, and six months
The average score varies between 0 and 4, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline, three months, and six months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DSM-5 Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure Youth Self Report
Time Frame: Baseline, three months, and six months
The average score varies between 0 and 4, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline, three months, and six months
DSM-5 Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure Parent Report
Time Frame: Baseline, three months, and six months
The average score varies between 0 and 4, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Baseline, three months, and six months
Upward Social Comparison (EMA)
Time Frame: Every three days throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Mediator measured with a single, face-valid item in EMA surveys: "Over the past 24 hours, how often have you compared yourself to someone who you believe is better off than you?"
Every three days throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Offline Social Capital: Quantity of In-Person Social Interactions (EMA)
Time Frame: Every three days throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Mediator measured with a single, face-valid item in EMA surveys: "Over past 24 hours, how much time did you spend socializing in person?"
Every three days throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Offline Social Capital: Quality of In-Person Social Interactions (EMA)
Time Frame: Every three days throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Mediator measured with a single, face-valid item in EMA surveys: "Over past 24 hours, how much did you enjoy your in-person social interactions with others?"
Every three days throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Quantity of Online Social Interactions (Mobile Sensing)
Time Frame: Daily throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Mediator: Quantity of digital social interactions based on the total number of words participants type on their phone keyboards each day.
Daily throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Valence of Online Social Interactions (Mobile Sensing)
Time Frame: Daily throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Mediator: Quality/valence of digital social interactions by measuring the balance between positive and negative words participants type on their phone keyboards. The valence of the words typed will first be scored using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software. The sum of the valence scores of all words will produce the final score for analysis.
Daily throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Active (vs Passive) Social Media Use (Mobile Sensing)
Time Frame: Daily throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Active usage includes creating content and direct messaging, while passive usage includes browsing, scrolling, or watching videos. Using data from the Inertial Measurement Unit (i.e., accelerometer and gyroscope data) and keyboard input (i.e. typing or not), an Extremely Randomized Trees algorithm will classify behaviors into active or passive.
Daily throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Passive (vs Active) Social Media Use (Mobile Sensing)
Time Frame: Daily throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Active usage includes creating content and direct messaging, while passive usage includes browsing, scrolling, or watching videos. Using data from the Inertial Measurement Unit (i.e., accelerometer and gyroscope data) and keyboard input (i.e. typing or not), an Extremely Randomized Trees algorithm will classify behaviors into active or passive.
Daily throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Time Spent in Specific Social Media Apps (Mobile Sensing)
Time Frame: Daily throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Time participants spend in specific social media apps as assessed unobtrusively by mobile sensing.
Daily throughout the study with two averages computed for 0 to 3 months and 3 to 6 months.
Parent-child conflict
Time Frame: Every three days for a total of 60 days (EMA)
Mediator measured with a single, face-valid item in EMA surveys and answered by the parent: "Over past 24 hours, my child and I did not get along. (1-not at all to 10-very much)"
Every three days for a total of 60 days (EMA)
Linguistic Indicators of Depression (Mobile Sensing)
Time Frame: Every day for a total of 180 days
Present temporal focus (i.e., using the present tense) and self-focus (i.e., using first-person pronouns) based on the language participants use while typing on their phones.
Every day for a total of 180 days
ADHD Inattention Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline
Moderator variable: Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale completed by parents as a measure of symptoms of adolescents' ADHD at baseline. For exploratory purposes, we will administer the Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale at the two follow-up assessments, as well.
Baseline
Sustained Attention
Time Frame: Baseline
Moderator: Sustained attention/inhibitory control as assessed by Gradual Onset Continuous Performance Task (gradCPT), which is a go/no-go continuous performance task validated in adolescents in the target age range. The primary moderator of interest is accuracy (d') based on signal detection. For exploratory purposes, we will administer the gradCPT at the two follow-up assessments, as well.
Baseline
Motives for Using Social Media
Time Frame: Baseline, three months, and six months
Moderator: Scale of Motives for Using Social Networking Sites (SMU-SNS), designed to assess different motivations for using social media specifically in adolescents (e.g., Social Connectedness, Social Recognition, Following Others).
Baseline, three months, and six months
Loneliness
Time Frame: Baseline, three months, and six months
Exploratory measure: UCLA Loneliness Scale
Baseline, three months, and six months
Parenting Style
Time Frame: Baseline
Moderator: Authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive parenting styles as assessed by the Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire.
Baseline
Sleep
Time Frame: Every day for a total of 180 days
Mediator as assessed by mobile sensing data (acceleromer, GPS)
Every day for a total of 180 days
Physical activity
Time Frame: Every day for a total of 180 days
Mediator as assessed by mobile sensing data (accelerometer, GPS)
Every day for a total of 180 days
Parent-Imposed Restrictions on Social Media Use
Time Frame: Baseline, three months, and six months
A study-specific, face-valid measure assessing restrictions that parents have imposed on the adolescents' social media use overall and on their use of specific social media platforms.
Baseline, three months, and six months
Parent and Child Demographics
Time Frame: Baseline
Age, sex at birth, self-identified gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and other demographics as assessed by the ABCD Parent Demographics Survey (NDA code: pdem02) and Child Demographics Survey (NDA code: child_dem01)
Baseline
Current and Past Mental Health Diagnoses
Time Frame: Eligibility Survey, Baseline, Three months, and six months
Parent-reported and self-reported current and past psychiatric diagnoses and developmental problems, including their severity as assessed by a modified version of the Psychiatric Diagnoses Form (NDA code: psydif01).
Eligibility Survey, Baseline, Three months, and six months
Current and Past Suicidal Ideation
Time Frame: Eligibility Survey, Baseline, Three months, and six months
Current and past suicidal ideation assessed as follows: Over the last two weeks, how often have you been bothered by thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way?" and "Have you ever been bothered by thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way?"
Eligibility Survey, Baseline, Three months, and six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 2, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R01MH135467 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Demographic, clinical (self-reports and parent reports), neurocognitive (gradCPT), and passive mobile sensing data (accelerometer, GPS, keyboard input, app usage) will be collected and made available on NIMH Data Archive (NDA). All data will be de-identified prior to deposition to NDA. To request access to the data, researchers will use the standard processes at NDA, and the NDA Data Access Committee will decide which requests to grant. All code for the analyses-including statistical analysis, data transformations, and data cleaning-will be shared on the Open Science Framework (OSF). The code can be found by searching for "Kostadin Kushlev" on the Open Science Framework.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

All data will be deposited to NDA starting 12 months after the award begins and will be deposited every six months thereafter following the usual NDA data submission dates.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

To request access to the data, researchers will use the standard processes at NDA, and the NDA Data Access Committee will decide which requests to grant. The standard NDA data access process allows access for one year and is renewable. The protocol and code will be available on OSF to anybody with access to the internet. De-identified data associated with each publication will also be made available on OSF by the publication date of each paper.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe