FCHV-HTN Implementation Trial in Nepal (CHPC)

February 4, 2026 updated by: Yale University

Community Health Worker Led Hypertension Prevention and Control (CHPC) in Nepal: An Implementation Trial

The goal of this hybrid type III study incorporating a cluster-randomized trial is to assess the effect of a community health worker-led hypertension prevention and control program (CHPC) on the implementation outcomes and clinical outcomes among patient with hypertension in central Nepal. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. What is the level of implementation outcomes, including reach, adoption, implementation fidelity, and maintenance of the CHPC implementation strategy at the patient, provider, and health system levels?

2: What is the effectiveness of the CHPC implementation strategy compared to facility-based intervention on systolic BP via a cluster randomized controlled trial.

3: What is the implementation cost and cost-effectiveness of the CHPC implementation strategy?

Participants will receive four follow-up group meetings or home visits every three months for a year by a community health worker. Researchers will compare if there is a significant difference in systolic blood pressure between those who receive this intervention and those who do not receive the intervention in the same community.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

INTRODUCTION:

Hypertension (HTN) is a global public health challenge. About 13.5% of global total mortality is attributed to high blood pressure (BP) worldwide. In addition, about 54% of strokes and 47% of coronary heart disease worldwide were attributable to high BP. In Nepal, the adult HTN prevalence is 25%, similar to the global prevalence. Community Health Workers (CHWs) are the frontline pillars of community-based health programs in Nepal. Through CHW, this investigation aims to influence HTN control and behavior change among adults and society at large. By providing a replicable model for increasing HTN awareness, treatment, and control in Nepal, investigators will accelerate the integration of effective intervention into practice, providing an example of amelioration of the well-documented delays in moving tested interventions to practice. To ensure relevance to policymakers, the investigators will follow the principles of 'practical trials that include: (a) implementing the strategy, (b) facilitating and evaluating the maintenance of the strategy beyond the implementation phase; (c) using multiple evaluation measures relevant to decision makers, including reach, adoption, and cost; and (d) evaluating effectiveness across multiple outcomes, with a plan to triangulate findings from across multiple data sources using both qualitative and quantitative measures.

METHODS:

Investigators will conduct a Hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation design focusing primarily on implementation outcomes while also collecting effectiveness outcomes as they relate to the uptake or fidelity of the intervention. The primary implementation outcomes (aim 1) - reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance - are selected to answer the central research question of this study and will be assessed using a non-inferiority design. Investigators will assess these outcomes in the intervention group using data from the process evaluation in intervention health facilities. For each outcome, the null hypothesis is that the percentages are equivalent to a set target or greater. Thus, if the program is successful, investigators will be able to say with 95% confidence that these high standards have been met. To measure the effectiveness (aim 2), investigators will use a cluster-randomized design to assess change in mean systolic BP in the intervention group compared to the control group at 12 months after the intervention. Investigators will also measure cost and estimate incremental cost per participant with awareness on and control of high BP (aim 3).

STUDY SETTING:

We will conduct the study in Sindhupalchowk district, one of the largest districts in Bagmati province, Nepal, consisting of nine rural and three urban municipalities. Basic health facilities in the Sindhupalchowk district province that host CHWs will be included. In the study districts, there are 102 basic health facilities, and approximately 687 CHWs. These CHWs are female community health volunteers (FCHV) who provide basic health services in Nepal, historically focused on maternal and child health.

INTERVENTION: FCHV-led Hypertension Prevention and Control (CHPC) Program

Fundamentally, the intervention involves task-shifting of HTN management roles to primary care and community-level health workers, integrating the five components of the evidence-based interventions outlined in the Package of Essential Non-Communicable Diseases (PEN) protocol 1 and 2:

  1. BP measurement and monitoring;
  2. identify high BP individuals and report to health facility;
  3. provide one-on-one counseling and lifestyle modification goal setting including sodium reduction, healthy diet, alcohol abstinence, physical activity, and medication;
  4. BP monitoring of HTN patients; and
  5. medication adherence of HTN patients, delivered by the FCHVs trained for the intervention.

The intervention will be conducted over a fiscal year, and repeated during the maintenance.

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES:

To address barriers of implementing the intervention, we will incorporate the following strategies and core components:

  1. Leadership support and ongoing program promotion - Health Coordinators from Provincial MoH will participate in the planning, execution and monitoring of the study. In provincial MoH health review meetings, hypertension-related indicators (proportion of population screened, HTN detected, HTN under medication, HTN control) will be discussed using the government's health management information system data.
  2. Capacity building - Healthcare workers training; FCHV training; Coaching and technical support from healthcare workers to FCHV in a monthly meeting
  3. CHW home visit and group meeting - 1st visit: introduction, rapport building, goal setting, BP monitoring; 2nd- 4th visit: BP monitoring, action and reflection, discussing problems faced in achieving their goals and implementing their action plans
  4. Social network - Monthly meeting of health care workers in the municipality; Monthly meeting of FCHVs in the health facility

DATA SOURCES:

Quantitative - Participant Survey; Anthropometric Measurement; Blood Pressure Measurement; Healthcare Provider Survey; Process Tracking

Qualitative - Periodic Reflection; Meeting Observations; Focus Group Discussions; Key Informant Interviews

The primary aim is to determine the extent to which this implementation model meets acceptable rates of program adoption, implementation, reach and maintenance of the CHPC program. For assessing the adoption, implementation, reach, and maintenance, we will include all intervention health facilities. To assess the effectiveness, we are planning for patients to be enrolled over six months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

3572

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Dhulikhel, Nepal
        • Recruiting
        • Dhulikhel Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-High blood pressure (BP) of 140/90 mmHg or higher.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe illness requiring bed rest
  • Pregnant women, due to their special health needs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention arm
Community Health Worker Intervention
Trained CHWs will hold group meetings or home visits using a locally adapted manual for HTN management. CHWs will visit homes in their areas and measure BP. High BP clients will be taken to the nearest health center. CHWs will enroll individuals with preHTN and HTN and conduct 4 follow-up group meetings or home visits with them every 3 months. Participants will be invited to attend CHW lead group-based counseling. For those with uncontrolled HTN who have difficulty adhering to prescribed HTN management and not willing or able to attend group meetings, CHWs will conduct follow-up home visits. First meeting (about 90 minutes), CHWs will explain purpose of the meeting and discuss HTN and its consequences. CHWs will apply techniques to initiate dialogue and reflection regarding lifestyle modifications and choose goals based on PEN protocol-2, BP monitoring, and antihypertensive medication use. In subsequent meetings (about 60 minutes), the CHWs will measure BP and address ongoing problems.
No Intervention: Control Group
Usual care that includes patients visit to health facility based on felt need

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reach
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of CHWs implementing the program
12 months
Adoption
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage of the health facilities asked to participate in adopting the program
12 months
Program implementation
Time Frame: 12 months
Percent of the health facility will implement a minimum standard to program implementation
12 months
Maintenance
Time Frame: 24 months
Percentage of the health facility that will implement a minimum standard to program implementation during the maintenance period
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 12 months
Difference in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) between study arms
12 months
Hypertension Diagnosis Awareness
Time Frame: 12 months
Difference in proportion of patients aware of their HTN diagnosis between study arms
12 months
Blood Pressure Control
Time Frame: 12 months
Difference in proportion of patients with controlled BP (less than 140/90 mmHg) between study arms
12 months
Physical activity
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients with low physical activity (less than 600 MET-minutes per week) between study arms
12 months
Fruits and Vegetables
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of participants with intake of 5 or more servings of fruits and vegetables per day between study arms
12 months
Medication
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of participants adherent to hypertension medication between study arms
12 months
Affordability
Time Frame: 12 months
Total incremental costs of care in the study arms
12 months
Equity
Time Frame: 12 months
Household economic impacts in the study arms by measurement of financial and economic costs. Disaggregated analysis, based on gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic status, will be conducted to assess disparities among the study groups
12 months
Scalability
Time Frame: 12 months
Scenario based and sensitivity analysis for scaling up this intervention at the national level
12 months
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 12 months
calculation of incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per person per QALY gained
12 months
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 12 months
calculation of incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per person per BP control gained
12 months
Scalability
Time Frame: 12 months
Scenario based and sensitivity analysis for scaling up this intervention at the provinical level
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Donna Spiegelman, ScD, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000036053
  • 1R01HL169421-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe