STrategies of Scheduled Drug-coated Balloons (DCB) Versus Conventional DES for the interveNTional Therapy of de Novo Lesions in Large Coronary vESSels (STENTLESS) Trial (STENTLESS)

October 14, 2023 updated by: Yongjian Wu, MD, PhD, China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study meant to compare the safety and efficacy of scheduled drug-coated balloon (DCB) and conventional drug-eluting stent (DES) strategy in the treatment of de novo lesions of large coronary vessel with diameter larger than 2.75 mm. The trial was designed to provide high-quality evidence for expanding the clinical indications of DCB, and to explore a better way for coronary intervention based on DCB.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2700

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100037
        • Recruiting
        • Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
        • Contact:
          • Yongjian Wu, PhD
          • Phone Number: +86 13701387189

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • De novo lesions of large coronary vessels with the diameter of target lesion reference vessel > 2.75 mm
  • Single- or multi-vessel disease with only 1 lesion meeting the definition of severe stenosis and anatomically amenable to coronary revascularization using DCB alone judged by physician.

    • Severe stenosis is defined if 1 of the following criteria are met:

      1. visual angiographic stenosis with severity >= 70%.
      2. functional stenosis with quantitative flow reserve (QFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) < 0.8.
  • Other coronary artery lesions are not recommended for coronary revascularization by current guidelines and are not likely need to be treated within the next 1 year judged by physician (e.g., visual stenosis with severity between 50-70% and FFR > 0.8)
  • The prospective subject is agreed on participating the study with a formal written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of acute coronary syndrome within the last 6 months.

    • Acute coronary syndrome is defined as 1 of following diagnosis:

      1. Unstable Angina Pectoris (UAP)
      2. ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
      3. Non-ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)
    • Diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) requires both clinical evidence of myocardial ischemia and elevation of cardiac Troponin (cTn) I or T values with at least 1 value above the 99th percentile upper normal range limit (URL)
    • Clinical evidence of myocardial ischemia is defined as 1 of the following:

      1. Symptoms of myocardial ischemia
      2. New ischemic ECG changes
      3. Development of pathological Q waves
      4. Imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality in a pattern consistent with an ischemic etiology
      5. Identification of a coronary thrombus by angiography
    • All types of MI (type 1 to 5 MI) defined by "the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018)", which occurred within the last 6 months from inclusion phase would be excluded from this study.
  • Patients who have received percutaneous coronary intervention (including stent implantation, plain old balloon angioplasty, and DCB angioplasty) within 12 months before the index procedure.
  • Currently recommended indications for DCB: in-stent restenosis, bifurcation lesions requiring concomitant intervention of the major vessel and its adjacent side branch (e.g., lesions requiring dual stent implantation, kissing balloon technique, etc.)
  • Lesions with any of the following anatomical characteristics presumably not suitable for DCB treatment:

    1. long lesion with length >= 40mm.
    2. severely calcified, moderate or severe tortuous, or severe angulated vessels, especially when vessel recoil seems possible.

      • Moderate tortuosity: 2 bends >75° or 1 bend >90° to reach the target lesion.
      • Severe tortuosity: 2 bends >90° or 3 bends >75° to reach the target lesion.
      • Severe angulation: angulated segment > 90°
      • Severe calcification: radiopacities noted without cardiac motion before contrast injection generally compromising both sides of the arterial lumen
    3. Chronic total occlusion

      • Definition: A lesion of a coronary artery becomes completely blocked for a duration of greater than or equal to 3 months based on angiographic evidence.
    4. lesions in left main coronary artery
    5. lesions in venous or arterial graft
  • Chronic heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% after 6 months of Guideline-Directed Medical Treatment (GDMT)
  • Acute heart failure, hemodynamic instability, or cardiogenic shock

    • Acute heart failure is defined as a rapid onset of new or worsening signs and symptoms of heart failure.
  • Non-cardiac Comorbidities:

    1. Severe liver insufficiency defined as 1 of the following:

      • alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase more than 5-fold of upper reference limit.
      • Child-Pugh grade B or C.
    2. Severe renal insufficiency with estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73m2.
    3. Malignant tumor.
    4. A life expectancy of less than 1 year.
  • Unsuitable for coronary intervention or long-term antithrombotic therapy

    1. Myocardial bridging located at target lesions.
    2. Major bleeding (BARC type 2 to 5) or active pathological bleeding (including gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding) within 3 months,or major surgery within 2 months.
    3. Open surgery is planned within six months after discharge.
    4. Intolerable to double (aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor) or single (aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor) antiplatelet therapy.
    5. History of intracranial hemorrhage.
    6. Pregnant women, lactating women, and women of childbearing potential.
  • History of artificial valve replacement.
  • History of participating in any other clinical studies or trials within 12 months before the index procedure.
  • Participants deemed unsuitable to be enrolled by investigators, such as conditions that may result in protocol nonadherence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Drug-coated balloon dominant strategy
  • Patients will receive DCB (Bingo©, Yinyi Ltd., China) only if pre-dilation of the lesion was successful, or otherwise receive bailout stenting.
  • If bailout stenting is indicated, patients will receive any type of commercially available 2nd Gen DES at physician's preference.
  • Patients treated with DCB will receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor) for 1-3 months, followed by long-term single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT, aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor).
  • Patients with bailout stenting will generally receive DAPT for 6 months unless deemed as with high ischemic and/or bleeding risks (see "special consideration" in Drug-eluting stent Arm), and then followed by long-term SAPT.
Active Comparator: Drug-eluting stent only strategy
-For conventional stenting, patients will receive any type of commercially available 2nd Gen DES at physician's preference.
  • Patients treated with DES will generally receive DAPT for 6 months unless deemed as with high ischemic and/or bleeding risks (see "special consideration" below), and then followed by long-term SAPT.
  • Special consideration:

    1. Patients will take additional assessment (both DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score) to determine their personalized duration of DAPT.
    2. The duration of DAPT is extended to 12 months for patients diagnosed as acute coronary syndrome within 12 months.
    3. If anticoagulation is indicated, patient will receive a short-term triple antithrombotic therapy (generally 1 to 4 weeks), followed by a variable length of dual antithrombotic therapy (oral anticoagulation (OAC) plus a single antiplatelet agent, preferably clopidogrel) and subsequent long-term OAC mono-therapy. The duration of dual antithrombotic therapy is determined by bleeding risks (HAS-BLED score) according to current guidelines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction and clinically indicated target vessel revascularization
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction and clinically indicated target vessel revascularization
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of a composite of peri-procedural complications including cardiac death, perioperative myocardial infarction, acute thrombosis at target vessel and acute occlusion at target vessel
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of a composite of peri-procedural complications including cardiac death, perioperative myocardial infarction, acute thrombosis at target vessel and acute occlusion at target vessel
30 days
Incidence of cardiac death
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of cardiac death
12 months
Incidence of target-vessel myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of target-vessel myocardial infarction
12 months
Incidence of clinically indicated target vessel revascularization
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of clinically indicated target vessel revascularization
12 months
Incidence of a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and re-hospitalization
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and re-hospitalization
12 months
Incidence of major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] definition, type 2 to 5)
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] definition, type 2 to 5)
12 months
Incidence of net clinical benefit (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, clinically indicated target vessel revascularization and major bleeding)
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of net clinical benefit (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, clinically indicated target vessel revascularization and major bleeding)
12 months
Score of Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Time Frame: 1, 6 and 12 months
SAQ, a 19-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations due to angina, any recent change in the severity of angina, the frequency of angina, satisfaction with treatment, and quality of life. SAQ scores range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate better health status.
1, 6 and 12 months
Score of EuroQol Five Dimensions-5L (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: 1, 6 and 12 months
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaires assesses health in five dimensions (Mobility, Human Autonomy, Current Activities, Pain / Discomfort, Anxiety / Depression), each of which has 5 levels of response (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems/unable to). Health state index scores generally range from less than 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating higher health utility. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a visual analogue scale on which the patient rates his/her perceived health from 0 to 100.
1, 6 and 12 months
Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)
Time Frame: 12 months
Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)
12 months
Total costs
Time Frame: 12 months
Total costs including the expenditure of hospitalization, physicians, examination, nursing care and medication
12 months
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER)
Time Frame: 12 months
The ICER of scheduled DCB compared with conventional DES is defined as the ratio between incremental costs associated with scheduled DCB and the variation in effectiveness. Costs will be measured in Chinese yuan (RMB). Effectiveness will be considered both in terms of life years gained, measured in years, and in terms of quality of life gained, measured in QALY. In the first case, ICER will be measured as RMB/years; in the second, it will be measured as RMB/QALY.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on De Novo Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Drug-coated balloon (Bingo© [Paclitaxel-coated Balloon], Yinyi Ltd., China)

Subscribe