An Investigation Into the Effects of Acute Exercise on Activities of Daily Living and Cognition in Older Adults

October 13, 2023 updated by: Jean-Charles Lebeau, Ball State University
Research has demonstrated the positive effects of chronic exercise on cognitive functioning and performance of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). However, minimal research exists regarding the effects of acute exercise. To address this gap in the literature, the present study investigated the effect of an acute bout of exercise on executive functions, balance, and ADLs among healthy older adults. Based on the current literature, we expected participants in the exercise group to perform better on executive function tasks and ADLs compared to participants in the control group.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Muncie, Indiana, United States, 47306
        • Ball State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over the age of 60.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • health complications preventing the ability to cycle on a recumbent bike and walking at moderate intensity as indicated by the health history questionnaire, taking anti-depressant medication, or having color blindness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: exercise
15min of cycling at moderate intensity
cycling exercise for 15min, with 5min warm up
No Intervention: video control
watching a video on healthy living

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Executive functions
Time Frame: 1 week
Stroop test. The Stroop test is a measure of executive functions, specifically the ability to inhibit a habitual response, selective attention, and shifting (Pachana et al., 2014). This test requires participants to identify the color name printed in the same ink color (e.g., BLUE printed in blue ink; congruent condition) or different ink color (e.g., BLUE printed in red ink; incongruent condition). Each stimulus word (i.e., red, green, and blue) was presented in equal proportions to minimize specific word facilitation. After nine practice trials, 72 stimuli (i.e., 2 blocks of 36) were presented to the participants using the Eprime software (Version 3.0). Participants were asked to press the key with the dot sticker corresponding to the three stimuli colors (i.e., red, blue, or green). Reaction time (RT) and accuracy were used as indices of performance.
1 week
Balance
Time Frame: 1 week
Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The BBS was developed to measure balance and fall risk among older adults. This scale is comprised of 14 tasks to assess balance, such as standing with eyes closed and retrieving an object from the floor. Performance is rated on a 0 to 4 scale for each task, with "0" indicating the lowest level of function and "4" the highest level of function. Total scores of 41 to 56 indicate a low fall risk, 21 to 40 a medium fall risk, and 0 to 20 a high fall risk (Berg et al., 1992).
1 week
Activity of daily living
Time Frame: 1 week
Medication task. A medication task was developed to test the participants' ability to properly complete their pill organizers. Participants read a fictional story about prescribed medications and were asked to determine the required frequency and dosage of the medications based on the prescription and the label on fake medication bottles filled with candy pills. Participants had to place the medications in a weekly pill organizer for each required day and time slot (AM and PM). Two scenarios were designed to both require a similar number of pills to be placed in the weekly container for pre and post-test. Time to complete the task and number of mistakes for each day and time slot were recorded as indices of performance. Mistakes were recorded when participants added too many or too little pills, when pills were placed in the incorrect AM/PM time slot, or when participants added the wrong type of medication on a given day.
1 week
Functional ability
Time Frame: 1 week
15 feet task. The 15-feet task measures functional ability in older adults. Participants are instructed to walk for 15 feet at their own pace while their performance is timed.
1 week
Fall risk
Time Frame: 1 week
Time up and go (TUG). The TUG is used to measure fall risk in the elderly population and consists of instructing the participant to stand up from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down in the chair. The participants were instructed to walk at their regular pace and performance was measured as the time required to complete the activity. A timed score of greater than 14 seconds indicated a high risk of falls (Bohannon, 2006).
1 week
Grip strength
Time Frame: 1 week
Grip strength. Verbecq et al. (2017) reported that low muscle strength, as measured by hand grip strength, was associated with a history of falls in older adults To measure hand grip strength, participants were asked to squeeze the handle of a handgrip dynamometer as hard as possible with their dominant hand and the mean score of three trials was recorded.
1 week
Commitment check
Time Frame: 1 week
A commitment check was developed to test participants' commitment to the tasks. Participated were asked how committed they were while performing (a) the Stroop task, (b) the medication task, (c) the BBS tasks, (d) the TUG task, and (e) the grip strength task. Each item was rated on a scale ranging from 1 (none / not at all) to 10 (very much / very well).
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Charles Lebeau, PHD, Ball State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1141661-20

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

dataset

IPD Sharing Time Frame

available immediately, no time frame

Study Data/Documents

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Inactivity

Clinical Trials on exercise

Subscribe