Adapting a Mammography Decision Aid to Support Women Living in a Community Contaminated by PFAS

August 14, 2026 updated by: Christine M. Gunn, Trustees of Dartmouth College

Adapting a Mammography Decision Aid to Support Women Living in a Community Contaminated by Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)

This community-engaged research project will test an adapted online breast cancer screening decision aid to address the needs of women living in an area where environmental contamination has increased concern about breast cancer risk. It will provide novel data on individual experiences with breast cancer risk assessment and decisional determinants of screening choices in a community disproportionately impacted by industrial pollution.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Environmental contamination is increasingly recognized as a critical driver of cancer disparities, and communities impacted by industrial pollution experience greater risk of cancer and higher cancer worry which complicates health decision making. Recently the National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) released guidance suggesting that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are suggestively associated with breast cancer risk and that individuals with moderate to high blood concentrations of these chemicals should screen for breast cancer according to age and other risk factors as recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Mammography screening guidelines for women in their 40s increasingly call for the use of risk assessment tools to guide screening initiation and imaging intervals (e.g. every year vs. every two years), but current tools do not address environmental risk factors that can contribute to breast cancer risk. This poses a particular challenge in communities where there is a real or perceived increased risk of breast cancer stemming from an environmental contamination concern. There are currently no decision tools tailored to help women living in such communities with their decisions about breast cancer screening. Therefore, the goal of the proposed work is to test an adapted online decision aid to incorporate environmental risk messaging to increase informed breast cancer screening decisions for women 40-49 years of age living in the greater Merrimack, New Hampshire area, where known and ongoing PFAS contamination exists. In partnership with Merrimack Citizens for Clean Water, we will distribute a community survey among screening-eligible women to test the new risk messaging within the decision aid (n=100) and establish acceptability in an open-label, single arm trial. The proposed research will contribute novel data on community-driven priorities for information about environmental contaminants that may affect breast cancer risk assessment and screening decisions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Hampshire
      • Hanover, New Hampshire, United States, 03755
        • Dartmouth College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females aged 39-49
  • No personal history of breast cancer,
  • No mammogram in the prior 12 months
  • Resident of Merrimack, Hillsborough, Rockingham or Bennington counties

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma in situ
  • Cognitive impairment impeding the ability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Decision Aid
Participants will receive the adapted MyMammogram decision aid that includes environmental risk information.
An online breast cancer screening decision aid that includes personalized risk assessment, information on benefits and risks of mammography screening, values clarification, outcome expectancies, and a summative document with participant responses.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability
Time Frame: Within 1 day, post-intervention
Acceptability e-scale,72 a 6-item measure for electronically-delivered interventions
Within 1 day, post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge
Time Frame: Immediately pre-intervention, within 1 day post-intervention
10 Knowledge items summed to measure understanding of clinical screening, alternatives, main benefits/risks
Immediately pre-intervention, within 1 day post-intervention
Decisional Conflict
Time Frame: Immediately pre-intervention, within 1 day post-intervention
The "SURE" measure, a 4-item validated checklist to assess decisional conflict, including benefits and risks of test
Immediately pre-intervention, within 1 day post-intervention
Screening self-efficacy
Time Frame: Immediately pre-intervention, within 1 day post-intervention
10-item validated scale measuring self efficacy in obtaining mammography with summed score, range 5-50
Immediately pre-intervention, within 1 day post-intervention
Screening Intentions
Time Frame: Immediately pre-intervention, within 1 day post-intervention
15-point validated scale measuring intentions and 1 decision question (yes/no/unsure)
Immediately pre-intervention, within 1 day post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christine M Gunn, PhD, Dartmouth College, Geisel School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual data that has been de-identified will be made available upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available after primary paper is published and for up to 3 years.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe