Neuro-biomechanical Determinants for Motor Behavior in High-risk Infants (BAMBI)

November 13, 2023 updated by: Stephane ARMAND, University Hospital, Geneva

Neuro-biomechanical Aspects Determining the Motor Behavior in Infants With High-risk of Neuromotor Impairments

This project focuses on motor development, muscle growth and muscle activity. Using advanced, instrumented tests such as , the link between muscles and the movement characteristics will be studied. In addition, the evolution of these neuro-biomechanical determinants during the first year of life will be investigated. The examinations are planned for a group of high-risk infants (e.g. premature birth, cases of asphyxia, etc.) compared with a group of infants with typical development.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background and rationale:

Prematurity and the associated causes of perinatal brain damage, as well as neonatal stroke and birth asphyxia, are major risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders appearing from birth. In addition, these neuromotor disorders resulting from impaired brain development appear progressively over the course of the first year, affecting early movement and muscle growth. Therefore, early diagnosis and motor therapy are essential to improve long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, in order to provide adequate strategies for these high-risk infants, it is crucial to identify the determinants of potential neuromotor deficits and their consequences on early motor behavior and developmental trajectory during the first year of life. A multimodal tool is needed to reveal the early neuro-biomechanical determinants of motor behavior in infants at high risk of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Objective(s):

  • Establishing a comprehensive multimodal tool for the assessment of neuro-biomechanical determinants of motor behavior in the first year of life in high-risk infants for neurodevelopmental impairments, further referred to as "advanced muscle and movement analysis (AMMA)"
  • Revealing early neuro-biomechanical determinants in high-risk infants covering the first year of life, including the time points in the neonatal period, at term age, at 3 months of (corrected) age, at 6 months of (corrected) age and at 12 months of (corrected) age, by using the AMMA

Outcome(s):

  • Using valid and reliable assessments within the protocol
  • Differences in neuro-biomechanical determinants between typically developing infants and high-risk infants at each time point.
  • Associations between the neuro-biomechanical determinants of motor behaviour in high-risk infants at each time point
  • Changes over time and interaction in the neuro-biomechanical determinants, and comparisons of these evolutions in high-risk infants with typical development.

Methodology

The current study is a national, single center (Geneva University Hospitals), observational study. This observational research will perform both cross-sectional and longitudinal data collection for cohorts of live-born infants.

The study population for this study will include children, i.e., neonates and infants between the age of 35-36 weeks of gestational age to 12 months of (corrected) age. Further, two main groups of children will be included, (a) typically developing (TD) children and (b) children at high-risk for neurodevelopmental impairments. The TD children will be used as a control group.

Procedure

Multiple study visits are planned for longitudinal data collection within the first year of life, i.e. a time of term age, at 3 months, at 6 months and 12 months of age. For the preterms, the investigators also plan to perform an assessment in the neonatal period, i.e. 35-36 weeks of gestation.

The duration of each visit session will be around 90 minutes per participant, providing also time for feeding moments and adaptation of the infant to the new environment. The visit in the neonatal period will be organized at the Neonatology Unit at HUG (Geneva University Hospitals). All visits from the term (equivalent) age will be organized in the Kinesiology Laboratory at the HUG.

In general, clinical data such as birth information, structural brain MRI and developmental assessments will be derived from the medical records.

The main procedures during each research visit are:

  1. Muscle assessment: using 3D freehand ultrasound technique, measuring the lower legs muscles, assessing muscle volume and length.
  2. Neuromotor development: using standardized scales, measuring the gross motor development and motor repertoire, assessing age-appropriate neuromotor development.
  3. Motor behavior: using surface electromyography and motion capture system, measuring spontaneous movements, assessing the movement quality and quantity

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

348

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1205
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospitals Geneva
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Stéphane Armand, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Preterm or a term born Infants with detectable risk factors for neurodevelopmental impairments will be enrolled

Description

Inclusion & exclusion criteria for group of high-risk infants:

  • Infants born before or at 28 weeks of gestation
  • Infants born after 28 weeks of gestation and with brain injury.
  • A term birth with the clinical diagnosis of asphyxia (ischemic event with hypothermia) or neonatal stroke
  • Exclusion in case of genetic syndrome, or lower limb pathology (e.g. spina bifida)

Inclusion & exclusion criteria for group of typically developing children:

  • Born at a gestational age above 37 weeks
  • Birth weight between P10 and P90
  • Head circumference between P10 and P90
  • Ph >7.1
  • Exclusion in case of genetic syndrome, lower limb pathology and/or brain malformations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
High-risk infants
No intervention
Typically developing infants
No intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General Movement Assessment
Time Frame: 35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age
Observation of general movements following the Prechtl's General Movement Assessment, interpreted by observing age-specific general movement components and extracting the Motor Optimality Score (0-12, the higher, the better outcome)
35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age
Hammersmith Neonatal/Infant Neurological Examination
Time Frame: 35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
Neurological assessment for different domains such as muscle tone, postures, movements and reflexes . Resulting in total scores (0-78) which can be compared to norm values, and higher scores indicate better outcome.
35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
Change in muscle morphology size
Time Frame: 35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
The size of the lower leg muscles defined by freehand ultrasound
35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
Change in muscle morphology length
Time Frame: 35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
The length of the lower leg muscles defined by freehand ultrasound
35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
Change in muscle activity
Time Frame: 35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
Investigation of the muscle activity during spontaneous, whole body movements by using surface electromyography.
35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
Change in motor behaviour
Time Frame: 35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
Investigation movement quality/quantify during spontaneous, whole body movements by using reflective markers.
35-36 weeks of gestation; term equivalent age, 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - Version III
Time Frame: 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
Standardized neurodevelopmental test of gross and fine motor skills. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS)
Time Frame: 3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
Assessment of gross motor development during prone, supine, sitting and standing. Scores from 0-60. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
3 months (corrected) age, 6 months (corrected) age and 12 months (corrected) age.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: classification
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks post-term age
Qualitatively assessment on the MRI classification system by Himmelman et al. to classify the nature of brain abnormalities.
up to 4 weeks post-term age
Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: quantification
Time Frame: up to 4 weeks post-term age
Qualitatively assessment on the MRI classification system by quantitative assessment using the Kidokoro scoring system to classify the extent of white and grey matter abnormalities. Total global scores were classified as normal (0-3), mild (4-7), moderate (8-11), or severe (≥12) brain abnormalities.
up to 4 weeks post-term age

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be made available upon publication via online repository (yareta or zenodo)

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon publication

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nervous System Diseases

Clinical Trials on No Intervention

3
Subscribe