- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06232187
AI Support in Novice's Decision-making for Ultrasound Fetal Weight Estimation (scan-AId)
Scan-AId: Artificial Intelligence Support in Novice's Decision-making for Assessing Ultrasound Fetal Weight Estimation - A Randomized Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to learn which type of artificial intelligence (AI) effects the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight (EFW), when performed by novices, in this study represented by medical students.
The study's objectives are:
- Which type of artificial intelligence support system works for novices in improving the ultrasound fetal weight diagnostic accuracy?
- Does the artificial intelligence improve image quality, evaluate the cognitive load placed on participants when utilizing AI support, and is the AI system usable for novices?
Participants will be tasked with conducting an ultrasound Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW) using either a simple black box AI or a detailed explainable AI feedback system. The AI systems will assist participants in determining if they have captured the appropriate image for EFW. The outcomes will then be compared to those of a control group.
Ultrasound procedures will be performed on pregnant women with fetuses at a gestational age of 30-37 weeks, who have previously undergone an EFW by an expert sonographer at the clinic either on the same day or the day before. One participant of each randomization arm, will perfrom an EFW on the same pregnant woman.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Mary L Ngo, MD
- Phone Number: +4520773779
- Email: mary.ngo@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Martin Tolsgaard, MD, PhD proffessor
- Phone Number: +4538664631
- Email: martin.groennebaek.tolsgaard@regionh.dk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
- Rigshospitalet
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Ultrasound novice participants:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Medical students with no former fetal or abdominal ultrasound training.
- The participants will have to understand spoken and written Danish or English.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Medical students who received formal fetal or abdominal training prior to the inclusion in this study.
Pregnant women;
Inclusion Criteria:
- The participants will have to understand spoken and written Danish or English.
- BMI < 30
- Gestational age: 28-42
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age > 40 years
- Fefal anomaly
- Oligohydramnion
- Gestational Diabetes, Diabetes type 1 or 2.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Feedback Group 1 (FG1)
Participatns in FG1 will receive basic black box AI support, with simple explanation like "standard plane", "non standard plane" or "off plane".
|
AI feedback in two levels, in aid of the participants, to obtain the right standardplane images used in fetal ultrasound EFW calculation.
|
Experimental: Feedback Group 2 (FG2)
Participants in FG2 will receive explainable AI support, with more elaborate description of the anatomical structures and segmentation of the anatomy.
|
AI feedback in two levels, in aid of the participants, to obtain the right standardplane images used in fetal ultrasound EFW calculation.
|
No Intervention: Control group (CG)
Participants in the CG will have a standard plane poster to help guide them to the EFW ultrasound standard plane images.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Diagnostic accuracy
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
The accuracy in each group was defined as the percentage difference between estimated fetal weight and the sonographer expert EFW
|
15 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Image Quality
Time Frame: 5 minutes pr. participant
|
Salomon criteria score is used to rate the image quality. Points are given depending on the number of landmarks present, quality of the image optimization and caliper.placements. Minimum: 1 Maximum: 18. A higher score indicates a better image quality. |
5 minutes pr. participant
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The AI system usability
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
The participants will be asked to answer a questionnaire: System Usability Scale (SUS), which is used to evaluate the AI feedback system. Min 1 Maximum 100. A higher score indicating better system usability. |
5 minutes
|
Measurement of the reaction time
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Measurements of the participants reaction time will a measurement for the cognitive load. The reaction time will be measured as a secondary task while the participants are performing the ultrasound scan. |
5 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Borsci S, Federici S, Lauriola M. On the dimensionality of the System Usability Scale: a test of alternative measurement models. Cogn Process. 2009 Aug;10(3):193-7. doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0268-9. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
- Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
- Cruz Rivera S, Liu X, Chan AW, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Oct;2(10):e549-e560. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30219-3. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
- Andreasen LA, Tabor A, Norgaard LN, Rode L, Gerds TA, Tolsgaard MG. Detection of growth-restricted fetuses during pregnancy is associated with fewer intrauterine deaths but increased adverse childhood outcomes: an observational study. BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(1):77-85. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16380. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
- Andreasen LA, Tabor A, Norgaard LN, Taksoe-Vester CA, Krebs L, Jorgensen FS, Jepsen IE, Sharif H, Zingenberg H, Rosthoj S, Sorensen AL, Tolsgaard MG. Why we succeed and fail in detecting fetal growth restriction: A population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 May;100(5):893-899. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14048. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
- Andreasen LA, Feragen A, Christensen AN, Thybo JK, Svendsen MBS, Zepf K, Lekadir K, Tolsgaard MG. Multi-centre deep learning for placenta segmentation in obstetric ultrasound with multi-observer and cross-country generalization. Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 8;13(1):2221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29105-x.
- Nicholls D, Sweet L, Hyett J. Psychomotor skills in medical ultrasound imaging: an analysis of the core skill set. J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Aug;33(8):1349-52. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.8.1349.
- Govaerts MJ, Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CP, Muijtjens AM. Workplace-based assessment: effects of rater expertise. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 May;16(2):151-65. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9250-7. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
- Tolsgaard MG, Pusic MV, Sebok-Syer SS, Gin B, Svendsen MB, Syer MD, Brydges R, Cuddy MM, Boscardin CK. The fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 156. Med Teach. 2023 Jun;45(6):565-573. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2180340. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
- Tolsgaard MG, Boscardin CK, Park YS, Cuddy MM, Sebok-Syer SS. The role of data science and machine learning in Health Professions Education: practical applications, theoretical contributions, and epistemic beliefs. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Dec;25(5):1057-1086. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-10009-8. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
- Degallier-Rochat S, Kurpicz-Briki M, Endrissat N, Yatsenko O. Human augmentation, not replacement: A research agenda for AI and robotics in the industry. Front Robot AI. 2022 Oct 4;9:997386. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.997386. eCollection 2022. No abstract available.
- Vasey B, Novak A, Ather S, Ibrahim M, McCulloch P. DECIDE-AI: a new reporting guideline and its relevance to artificial intelligence studies in radiology. Clin Radiol. 2023 Feb;78(2):130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.09.131.
- Liu X, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK; SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Oct;2(10):e537-e548. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30218-1. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
- Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Da Silva Costa F, Deter RL, Figueras F, Ghi T, Glanc P, Khalil A, Lee W, Napolitano R, Papageorghiou A, Sotiriadis A, Stirnemann J, Toi A, Yeo G. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):715-723. doi: 10.1002/uog.20272.
- Hadlock FP. Sonographic estimation of fetal age and weight. Radiol Clin North Am. 1990 Jan;28(1):39-50.
- Bloch R, Norman G. Generalizability theory for the perplexed: a practical introduction and guide: AMEE Guide No. 68. Med Teach. 2012;34(11):960-92. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.703791.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- F-24001576
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ultrasound
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompletedUltrasound Training | Ultrasound Simulation | Ultrasound Assessment | Technology-enhanced Learning | Virtual Reality SimulationDenmark
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedTrans Abdominal Ultrasound | Transvaginal Ultrasound | Lower Uterine Segment ThicknessEgypt
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingLearning Curve | Gastric Ultrasound | Novel in Gastric UltrasoundThailand
-
Tan Tock Seng HospitalRecruiting
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompleted
-
Brooke Army Medical CenterCompleted
-
Emergency Medical Service of the Central Bohemian...The Society of General Practice, J. E. Purkyne Czech Medical Association; Institute...Recruiting
-
IntelligentUltrasound LimitedCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompleted