The DreamChanger Intervention in Combination With Imagery Rehearsal Therapy for Children's Nightmares

September 13, 2025 updated by: Michal Kahn, Tel Aviv University

Efficacy of the DreamChanger Intervention in Combination With Imagery Rehearsal Therapy to Reduce Nightmares in Children

This clinical trial will test the efficacy of parent-delivered DreamChanger Intervention in combination with Imagery Rehearsal Therapy (IRT) for reducing the frequency and severity of nightmares in children aged 3-10. Children will be randoimized to either the combined intervention or to a waitlist control group.The intervention will include providing children with the DreamChanger remote, and providing parents with instructional videos, explaining how to use the device along with the IRT strategy to address nightmares.

At baseline, mid-treatment, and post-treatment, parents in both groups will complete questionnaires asking about the child's nightmares, sleep, externalizing and internalizing symptoms, PTSD symptoms, demographic characteristics, and parent sleep and distress. Parents in the intervention group will also be asked to complete questionnaires regarding their compliance and satisfaction with the intervention, as well as a 3-month follow-up assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Nightmares, characterized as distressing dreams often leading to awakening, are relatively common in young children. However, approximately 3-6% of children endure recurrent nightmares, occurring at least once per week, causing significant distress and impairment. These persistent nightmares can be idiopathic or post-traumatic, and may be linked to conditions such as nightmare disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Children experiencing recurrent nightmares face an elevated risk for various maladaptive consequences, including reduced sleep quality and quantity, heightened nocturnal anxiety, and challenges in emotional, social, and academic functioning. Moreover, parents often experience disruptions in their own sleep, which may lead to adverse health outcomes. Hence, the demand for effective interventions to mitigate the multifaceted burdens associated with recurrent nightmares is pronounced.

The most established intervention for children struggling with recurrent nightmares is Imagery Rehearsal Therapy (IRT). This approach aims to diminish the frequency and intensity of nightmares by encouraging children to engage with and modify the content of their nightmares through visualization and rehearsal techniques. Studies assessing the efficacy of IRT in children have demonstrated significant reductions in nightmare frequency and associated distress following treatment. However, the evidence base for this intervention remains limited, with only one small-scale (N=20) randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in children to date. Correspondingly, there is a critical need for further research to evaluate treatment effectiveness in children.

Furthermore, despite the promise of IRT in reducing nightmare frequency and intensity, approximately 30% of children do not sufficiently benefit from treatment. This underscores the necessity to refine and tailor this intervention to better address the characteristics of children. To date, research has yet to explore the potential advantages of augmenting IRT with additional components. The DreamChanger intervention offers a novel approach specifically designed for young children experiencing recurrent nightmares. Utilizing a remote-control-like device emitting a soft light, this cognitive intervention empowers children to "change the channel of their dreams", fostering a sense of mastery and control. A recent RCT demonstrated the efficacy of the DreamChanger in reducing nightmares and anxiety in young children. Building upon these findings, we posit that combining IRT with the DreamChanger may enhance treatment outcomes. Encouraging children to utilize the DreamChanger remote during the rehearsal of alternative dream scenarios may establish associations between the remote and alternative dream imagery, potentially improving the mental accessibility of imagery when using the remote at night. Thus, the DreamChanger has the potential to augment IRT by further stimulating the child's imagination and sense of mastery, while also facilitating the rehearsal and accessibility of alternative dream imagery.

This study seeks to advance scientific knowledge regarding interventions for pediatric nightmares by examining the efficacy of a novel treatment approach - a combination of IRT with the DreamChanger intervention - to alleviate recurrent nightmares and improve sleep quality in young children. This augmented intervention will be compared to a waitlist control group in an RCT. The research plan is based on an RCT design, with 2 arms (intervention vs waitlist control) and assessment points at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and for the intervention group - an additional 3-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Israel
      • Tel Aviv, Israel, Israel
        • Tel Aviv University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • child aged 3-10 years
  • parents aged over 18 years
  • child experiencing distressing nightmares at least once per week on average, for at least 1 month.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child receiving concurrent treatment for nightmares, sleep, or anxiety
  • Child diagnosed with a medical sleep problem (e.g., OSA, RLS)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DreamChanger combined with Imagery Rehearsal Therapy
Families will receive the DreamChanger remote along with 3 instructional videos for parents, explaining how to present the remote to children, and how to rehearse alternative dream imagery using the DreamChanger remote.
Families will receive the DreamChanger remote along with 3 instructional videos for parents, explaining how to present the remote to children, and how to rehearse alternative dream imagery using the DreamChanger remote.
No Intervention: Waitlist control
Families will be placed on a waitlist, and receive the intervention 6 weeks after baseline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nightmare frequency and severity
Time Frame: Baseline, mid-treatment (2 weeks following baseline), post-treatment (4 weeks following baseline), and at a 3-month follow up
Nightmare severity, frequency and related distress, as assessed using a modified version of the Nightmare Disorder Index
Baseline, mid-treatment (2 weeks following baseline), post-treatment (4 weeks following baseline), and at a 3-month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child sleep problems
Time Frame: Baseline, mid-treatment (2 weeks following baseline), post-treatment (4 weeks following baseline), and at a 3-month follow up
Sleep difficulties such as frequent awakenings, prolonged nighttime wakefulness, and short sleep duration, as assessed uding the Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire.
Baseline, mid-treatment (2 weeks following baseline), post-treatment (4 weeks following baseline), and at a 3-month follow up
Child externalizing and internalizing problems
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks following baseline), and at a 3-month follow up
Child behavioral problems, as assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks following baseline), and at a 3-month follow up
Parent distress
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks following baseline), and at a 3-month follow up
Parent depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms, as assessed using the DASS-21.
Baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks following baseline), and at a 3-month follow up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parent compliance and satisfaction with the intervention
Time Frame: Mid-treatment and post-treatment (4 weeks following baseline)
Parent adherence to the intervention (e.g., watching the instructional videos, rehearsing the alternative dream scenarios, etc.) will be assessed, along with items regarding parents' satisfaction with the intervention.
Mid-treatment and post-treatment (4 weeks following baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michal Kahn, PhD, Tel Aviv University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0008185-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe