- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06468072
Exploring Theatrical Expressive Tasks for Children With ASD
Exploring the Impact of Theatrical Expressive Tasks in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Flavia Marino
- Phone Number: +393395798263
- Email: flavia.marino@irib.cnr.it
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Maria Valeria Maiorana
- Email: mariavaleria.maiorana@irib.cnr.it
Study Locations
-
-
-
Messina, Italy, 98164
- Recruiting
- Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB) - National Research Council (CNR)
-
Contact:
- Flavia Marino
- Phone Number: +393395798263
- Email: flavia.marino@irib.cnr.it
-
Principal Investigator:
- Flavia Marino
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Giovanni Pioggia
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Paola Chilà
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Roberta Minutoli
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Noemi Vetrano
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Chiara Failla
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Germana Doria
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Ileana Scarcella
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Chiara Rando
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Luigi Polimeni
-
Contact:
- maria valeria Maiorana
- Phone Number: +393285856656
- Email: mariavaleria.maiorana@irib.cnr.it
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Massimo Barilla
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder;
- Age between 6 and 11 years;
- IQ over 80 assessed by means of WISC-IV.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of other medical disorders
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Children with autism
The experimental group consists of 10 children diagnosed with autism who voluntarily attend the CNR-IRIB in Messina.
The sample is aged between 7 and 11 years with severity level 1 (minimum support required)
|
The activities proposed by this protocol stimulate different expressive skills, which are often lacking in people with autism.
For this reason, the protocol is based on the strengthening of the following skills: perception of the body in movement in the space (4 sessions), the expressiveness of the body in its entirety (4 sessions), breathing and the use of the voice to express emotions in relation to the environment (4 sessions), rhythm and movement, to develop motor coordination and the expressiveness of movements (4 sessions).
The protocol consists of 16 sessions: a weekly group session lasting one hour.
|
|
Other: Non-autistic children
The comparison group consists of 10 non-autistic children with no other diagnosis, who voluntarily attend the CNR-IRIB in Messina.
The sample is between 7 and 11 years old.
|
The activities proposed by this protocol stimulate different expressive skills.
The protocol is based on the strengthening of the following skills: perception of the body in movement in space (4 sessions), the expressiveness of the body in its entirety (4 sessions), breathing and the use of the voice to express emotions in relation to the environment (4 sessions), rhythm and movement, to develop motor coordination and the expressiveness of movements (4 sessions).
The protocol consists of 16 sessions: a weekly group session lasting one hour.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Profiling Elements of Prosodic Systems in Children (PEPS-C)
Time Frame: The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.
|
Profiling Elements of Prosody in Speech-Communication (PEPS-C) is a semi-automated test battery for assessing receptive and expressive prosody skills. It has been used in several studies of the speech and understanding of children with high-functioning autism/Asperger's syndrome (see Prosody and autism spectrum conditions). It is intended for use by language teachers, clinicians and researchers in assessing prosody in any conditions in both children and adults. PEPS-C comprises 14 tasks, addressing receptive and expressive skills in parallel. The tasks are at two levels, examining prosodic function and prosodic form respectively. The assessment of skills at two levels helps to determine the level at which a testee has a problem with prosody, thus enabling better targeting of intervention. The range score is min 0 -max 192. |
The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.
|
|
Pragmatic Skills in the Medea Language (APL MEDEA)
Time Frame: The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change
|
APL Medea is an assessment battery for pragmatic language skills developed at the Cognitive Psychology and Neuropsychology Service of the IRCCS 'Eugenio Medea'. Structure: Metaphors (M), divided into Verbal Metaphors (MV) and Figurative Metaphors (MF): investigates the ability to understand metaphorical language. Comprehension of implicit meaning (CSI): assesses the ability to draw inferences about non-explicit content, range scores min 0 -max 72. Comics (F): assesses the ability to understand and respect the dialogic structure in a communication, range scores min 0 -max 72. Situations (S): assesses the ability to understand and appropriate the meaning assumed by particular expressions in social interaction, range scores min 0 -max 72. The Colour Game (GC): assesses the ability to use language in a referential manner and use skills related to "Theory of Mind", range scores min 0 -max 72. |
The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change
|
|
Test for understanding emotions (TEC)
Time Frame: The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.
|
This test assesses the presence and development of emotional competence in children aged 3 to 11 years. The test consists of 23 numbered cardboard plates. The first five boards depict four different emotional expressions each, alternating randomly. For each of them, the child is asked to identify a specific emotion. The structure of the remaining boards is instead unique: for each component, the upper part of the board represents a small story with emotional content, where the face of the protagonist is left blank. The lower part, represents four different emotional expressions, from which the child is asked to choose the corresponding one. The administration is individual. From the application of the instrument, the authors came to the identification of a meta-emotional competence divided into three developmental areas categorisation of emotions in relation to their nature, understanding of the causes of emotions, control of emotions. The range score is min -0,3 - max 3,78. |
The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.
|
|
Movement Assessment Battery for Children - Second Edition (ABC-Movement - 2)
Time Frame: The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.
|
The Movement ABC-2 battery identifies and describes the movement difficulties of children and adolescents from 3 to 16 years of age. The battery enables assessment and intervention planning in line with the bio-psycho-social model of human functioning. The Movement ABC-2 battery consists of 3 components: A standardized test consisting of 24 tests divided into groups of 8 tasks for 3 age groups (3-6; 7-10; 11-16), for 3 competence areas (Manual Dexterity, Aiming and Grasping, Balance). In addition to the total score, it is also possible to obtain separate scores for the three competence areas. The range score is min 1- max 19. An observational checklist consisting of 43 items divided into three sections, it must be completed by an adult who has the opportunity to observe the child in his/her daily motor activities. A manual checklist that describes the ecological approach to intervention for children with movement difficulties. |
The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.
|
|
Children's Communication Checklist - Second Edition (CCC-2)
Time Frame: The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.T
|
The CCC-2 is a test that assesses the presence of communicative problems of a pragmatic nature that are difficult to assess with traditional tests. It consists of 70 multiple-choice items divided into 10 scales each containing seven items. For each scale, five items describe difficulties and two items describe strengths. The respondent is asked to rate the frequency with which different behaviors occur. The scales are as follows: Eloquence, Syntax, Semantics, Coherence, Inappropriate beginning, Stereotyped language, Use of context, Non-verbal communication, Social relations, Interests (range score min 1 - max 280) Using these scales, two global scores can be calculated, the Global Communication Score (GCC) and the Global Social Interaction Discrepancy Score (SIDC). The questionnaire is completed by an adult who has regular contact with the child or young person, preferably a parent. |
The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.T
|
|
Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)
Time Frame: The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.
|
The SRS assesses reciprocal social behavior, communication and repetitive and stereotyped behavior characteristic of autism spectrum disorders in subjects between 4 and 18 years. A total score gives a measure of the severity of the social deficit and allows comparisons between different settings and assessors. The SRS is divided in the following subscales. Social awareness: ability to pick up social cues (range scores min 30- max ≥ 90). Social cognition: ability to interpret social signals once they have been perceived (range scores min 30-max ≥ 90). Social communication: includes expressive social communication (range scores min 30-max ≥ 90). Social motivation: indicates the extent to which a subject is generally motivated to engage in social-interpersonal behavior (range scores min 30-max ≥ 90). Autistic mannerisms: include stereotyped behavior or highly restricted interests characteristic of autism (range scores min 30-max ≥ 90). |
The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.
|
|
Khymeia Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRRS)
Time Frame: The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.
|
Advanced software for analyzing facial expressions, it allows artificial intelligence technologies to accurately identify and interpret a broad spectrum of human emotions, recording facial movements, including those of the mouth, eyes and eyebrows, as well as the static balance of each child participating in the study.
|
The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change.
|
|
NEuroPSYcology second edition (NEPSY-II) evaluations
Time Frame: The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change. The test needs about 120-180 minutes.
|
Secondary Outcome Measure Description. NEuroPSYcology second edition (NEPSY-II) is the most internationally known battery for assessing neuropsychological development in developmental age. Each NEPSY-II test provides raw scores that must be converted into scalar scores (min 1 - max 19) or percentile scores (min <2% - max >75%) according to the conversion tables in the manual. Neuropsychology II Edition (NESPY)' s Theory of Mind (ToM) subtest, section A is used in this protocol. Assesses the ability to decode and interpret others' intentions and life points and understand how they influence behavior. The test will be given to children pre- and post-intervention. The ToM test is divided into verbal: the child is read scenarios or shown figures and asked questions that require understanding of the other's point of view; nonverbal: the child is asked to choose the emotional expression appropriate to the mood of a character depicted in certain contexts. |
The test will be scheduled pre intervention (T0) and at the study conclusion, about 1 year (T1). The T0 and T1 evaluations were conducted to determine whether the protocols carried out made a change. The test needs about 120-180 minutes.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Flavia Marino, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB) - National Research Council (CNR)
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lord C, Elsabbagh M, Baird G, Veenstra-Vanderweele J. Autism spectrum disorder. Lancet. 2018 Aug 11;392(10146):508-520. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31129-2. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
- Zanchi, P., Peppé, S., & Zampini, L. (2022). Prosodic development from 4 to 10 years: Data from the Italian adaptation of the PEPS-C. Speech Communication, 144, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2022.08.007
- Mandy W, Wang A, Lee I, Skuse D. Evaluating social (pragmatic) communication disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;58(10):1166-1175. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12785. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
- Paul, R., & Simmons, E. (2019). Communication and its development in autism spectrum disorders. In Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CNR-IRIB-PRO-2024-008
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.