Novel Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation Knife in Esophageal Lesions

March 23, 2026 updated by: Salmaan Azam Jawaid, MD, Baylor College of Medicine

Prospective Multicenter Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Feasibility of a Novel Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation Knife in Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Both Baylor St Luke's Medical Center and Mayo Scottsdale are considered endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) centers of excellence. The investigators at Baylor College of Medicine have previously reported our Esophageal ESD experience using the monopolar current knife. Moreover, the research team have previously reported on the clinical efficacy of the bipolar RFA knife during per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and colonic ESD. The goal of our study is to prospectively evaluate the efficacy, safety and feasibility of Esophageal ESD using a novel Bipolar-Current ESD device.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel technique for the removal of esophageal lesions or polyps with high-risk features. ESD is minimally invasive and allows the removal of esophageal polyps without resorting to morbid surgery. The process of ESD includes marking the lesions selected for removal, followed by submucosal injection of a lifting agent, then circumferential incisions using a specialized knife followed by submucosal dissection of the entire lesion.

Traditionally, knifes utilizing monopolar current were the preferred tools for endoscopic submucosal dissection. These knifes allow accurate dissection and excellent hemostasis. However, due to monopolar current generated heat, post coagulation syndrome can be seen in up to 8 to 40 % of patients. Post coagulation syndrome present with pain, fever and leukocytosis and requires supportive treatment with IV fluid and antibiotics. In addition, for large esophageal lesions, stricturing can occur after resection due to significant scar formation resulting from the tissue healing response to electrocautery. Almost all patients with >60% of the esophageal circumference removed via monopolar knives, will develop an esophageal stricture at some point. These patients require serial esophageal dilations, and although easily managed, its development can be quite troublesome to the patient. Nevertheless, ESD is still the preferred modality for removal of these lesions since it avoids the need for morbid surgery.

Recently, a novel Bipolar RFA knife was FDA approved for endoscopic submucosal dissection. The low voltage bipolar system allows for precise cutting of submucosa and muscle using substantially less energy, thereby limiting inadvertent remote thermal effects. Additionally, it allows aggressive coagulation of vessels without dissipation of large amounts of energy, thereby allowing more targeted therapy. Moreover, with the addition of an integrated injection needle, the knife now allows injection, safe cutting and coagulation in one device, potentially supporting more efficient dissection. Ultimately, due to less thermal effect on surrounding tissue, the bipolar knife may allow for removal of large esophageal lesions without causing major esophageal stricturing.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • Baylor College of Medicine
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Salmaan Jawaid, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mohamed Othman, MD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tara Keihanian, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients undergoing intended ESD of precancerous lesions will be screened by study coordinators for preliminary eligibility and those who meet the inclusion criteria will be approach individually for further discussion about the study and obtaining informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is >18 years of age
  • Patient can provide informed consent
  • Patient is referred for resection of precancerous lesions meeting the following criteria:

    • Mucosal based polyp
    • Located gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) or proximal to GEJ
    • No previous endoscopic resection attempted (EMR or ESD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.5 or Platelets <50,000
  • Lesions extending past GEJ
  • Subepithelial lesions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Treatment arm
Patients who were deemed eligible and signed the consent will undergo the removal of their esophageal precancerous lesion utilizing the novel bipolar knife during their endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
Use of Speedboat™ Ultraslim for performing endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal lesions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success
Time Frame: Day 1 (procedure day)
Defined as the ability to perform the entire dissection (procedure) with the novel bipolar knife
Day 1 (procedure day)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of post-electrocautery syndrome
Time Frame: 24 hours, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks
Define as post-procedure abdominal pain, fevers, leukocytosis
24 hours, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks
Rate of esophageal stricturing
Time Frame: Assessed at any follow-up post-procedure endoscopies up to 6 months
Calculated by number of documented occurrences post-procedure for subjects
Assessed at any follow-up post-procedure endoscopies up to 6 months
Degree of scar formation
Time Frame: Assessed at any follow-up post-procedure endoscopies up to 6 months
Scar formation that occurs in response to electrocautery
Assessed at any follow-up post-procedure endoscopies up to 6 months
Speed of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Time Frame: During Procedure
The speed of endoscopic submucosal dissection as calculated by cm^2/hour
During Procedure
Number of instruments used
Time Frame: During Procedure
Logging the variable equipment utilized during the procedure
During Procedure
Rate of muscle injury score
Time Frame: During Procedure
As calculated by the Sydney Classification of Deep Mural Injury ranging from Type 0 - Type V with Type V as the most severe score.
During Procedure
Change in post-procedural pain score
Time Frame: 24 hours, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks
As calculated by the visual analog pain scale to measure patient pain ranging from 0-10 with 10 being the most pain.
24 hours, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks
Cost of dissection
Time Frame: During Procedure
As calculated upon review of devices used during dissection procedure
During Procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Speedboat™ Ultraslim

Subscribe